发展与教育心理学

初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系:社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用

  • 张林 ,
  • 洪新伟 ,
  • 范航 ,
  • 陈燕铃 ,
  • 赵明玉 ,
  • 朱婷婷 ,
  • 刘燊
展开
  • 1. 宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,宁波 315211;
    2. 中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872;
    3. 中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院,合肥 230051

收稿日期: 2021-06-30

  网络出版日期: 2022-03-20

基金资助

国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题(BHA190150)

Attachment Style and Defending Behaviors in Bullying Among Middle School Students: Chain Mediation Roles of Social Support and Bullying Coping Efficacy

  • ZHANG Lin ,
  • HONG Xinwei ,
  • FAN Hang ,
  • CHEN Yanling ,
  • ZHAO Mingyu ,
  • ZHU Tingting ,
  • LIU Shen
Expand
  • 1. Department and Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211;
    2. Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    3. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230051

Received date: 2021-06-30

  Online published: 2022-03-20

摘要

为考察初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系,同时探讨社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用,采用问卷法对565名初中生进行调查。结果发现:(1)依恋焦虑与欺凌保护行为呈显著正相关,依恋回避与欺凌保护行为呈显著负相关;(2)社会支持和欺凌应对效能在依恋回避与欺凌保护行为之间起链式中介作用。若要增加依恋回避初中生的欺凌保护行为,应注重为其提供社会支持,提升欺凌应对效能。

本文引用格式

张林 , 洪新伟 , 范航 , 陈燕铃 , 赵明玉 , 朱婷婷 , 刘燊 . 初中生依恋风格与欺凌保护行为的关系:社会支持和欺凌应对效能的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(2) : 212 -218 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.02.010

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between middle school students’ attachment style and defending behaviors in bullying, and to explore the mediating role of social support and bullying coping efficacy. A questionnaire survey was conducted among a sample of 565 middle school students. The results showed that: 1) attachment anxiety was positively related to defending behaviors in bullying, and attachment was negatively related to defending behaviors in bullying; 2) social support and bullying coping efficacy played a chain mediating role in the process of attachment avoidance associated with defending behaviors in bullying. If we want to increase the defending behaviors in bullying of attachment avoidance of middle school students, we should pay attention to providing social support and improving bullying coping efficacy.

参考文献

李同归, 加藤和生. (2006). 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版. 心理学报, 38(3), 399–406
刘勤学, 陈武, 周宗奎. (2015). 大学生网络使用与网络利他行为: 网络使用自我效能和性别的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 685–693
马原啸, 冉光明, 陈旭. (2016). 不安全依恋者注意偏向的形成机制及神经基础. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 392–401
任萍, 张云运, 周艳云. (2018). 校园欺负中的积极参与角色: 保护者. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 98–106
王才康, 胡中锋, 刘勇. (2001). 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学, 7(1), 37–40
王秀娟, 王娜, 韩尚锋, 刘燊, 张林. (2018). 面孔可信度对助人行为的影响: 依恋安全的调节作用. 心理学报, 50(11), 1292–1302
王艳辉, 李董平, 孙文强, 赵力燕, 赖雪芬, 周月月. (2017). 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 49(5), 663–679
夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. (2021). 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 344–352
肖水源. (1994). 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用. 临床精神医学杂志, 4(2), 98–100
谢其利, 李崇敬, 全小山, 何飞, 江光荣. (2018). 少年夫妻老来伴: 夫妻依恋与留守老人孤独感. 心理学报, 50(7), 771–781
张鹏, 张斌梅子, 邹建科, 刘翔平. (2018). 安全依恋启动影响社会行为: 方法、效果与机制. 心理科学, 41(3), 615–620
张鹏, 张艺缤, 韩瑞雪, 刘翔平. (2017). 亲密关系经历量表在我国青少年中的信、效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 873–876
赵凯莉, 杨梦圆, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. (2017). 成人依恋对大学生网络利他行为的影响: 共情与信任的中介作用. 人类工效学, 23(3), 23–28, 34.
钟韵, 刘聚红, 陈旭. (2014). 青少年同伴依恋: 基于发展的视角. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1149–1158
周宵, 伍新春, 王文超, 田雨馨. (2019). 汶川地震8.5年后青少年的社会支持与创伤后成长的关系: 自我效能感和自尊的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(5), 573–580
Bai, B., Chao, G. C. N., & Wang, C. (2019). The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and English language learning achievement in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 208–221, doi: 10.1002/tesq.439.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bistrong, E., Bottiani, J. H., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2019). Youth reactions to bullying: Exploring the factors associated with students’ willingness to intervene. Journal of School Violence, 18(4), 522–535.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664–678.
Casey, E. A., Lindhorst, T., & Storer, H. L. (2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 33–44, doi: 10.1037/vio0000033.
Corcoran, K. O. C., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(4), 473–483.
Creasey, G., Kershaw, K., & Boston, A. (1999). Conflict management with friends and romantic partners: The role of attachment and negative mood regulation expectancies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(5), 523–543, doi: 10.1023/A:1021650525419.
Demaray, M. K., Summers, K. H., Jenkins, L. N., & Becker, L. D. (2016). Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 158–188, doi: 10.1080/15388220.2014.964801.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 1–17.
Fan, H., Xue, L. L., Zhang, J., Qiu, S. Q., Chen, L. P., & Liu, S. (2021). Victimization and depressive symptoms among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294, 375–381, doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.022.
Fang, Y., Niu, Y., & Dong, Y. (2021). Exploring the relationship between narcissism and depression: The mediating roles of perceived social support and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110604, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110604.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–105.
Gökdağ, C. (2021). How does interpersonal emotion regulation explain psychological distress? The roles of attachment style and social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110763, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110763.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.
Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2017). Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: Internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 757–771.
Kogut, E. (2016). Adult attachment styles, self-efficacy, and causal attributional style for achievement-related failures. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 64–72, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.001.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221, doi: 10.1037/h0026570.
Leng, J., Guo, Q. K., Ma, B. Q., Zhang, S. Y., & Sun, P. (2020). Bridging personality and online prosocial behavior: The roles of empathy, moral identity, and social self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575053, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575053.
Li, S., Han, S. F., Wang, X. J., Guo, Z. B., Gan, Y. T., & Zhang, L. (2021). The influence of risk situation and attachment style on helping behavior: An attentional bias perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110357, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110357.
Mallinckrodt, B., & Wei, M. F. (2005). Attachment, social competencies, social support, and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 358–367, doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.358.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
Patterson, L. J., Allan, A., & Cross, D. (2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media & Society, 19(3), 366–383.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Robinson, J. S., Joel, S., & Plaks, J. E. (2015). Empathy for the group versus indifference toward the victim: Effects of anxious and avoidant attachment on moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 139–152, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.017.
Samper-García, P., Malonda-Vidal, E., Llorca-Mestre, A., Muñoz-Navarro, R., & Mestre-Escrivá, V. (2021). Victimization and peer and parents attachment: The mediating effect of regulatory emotional self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2062, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042062.
Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12(2), 145–161.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56–66.
Wood, L., Smith, J., Varjas, K., & Meyers, J. (2017). School personnel social support and nonsupport for bystanders of bullying: Exploring student perspectives. Journal of School Psychology, 61, 1–17.
Zhang, L. J., Zhang, S. P., Yang, Y., & Li, C. N. (2017). Attachment orientations and dispositional gratitude: The mediating roles of perceived social support and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 193–197, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.006.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发