群体夸耀方式对旁观者网络攻击行为的影响：旁观者的被挑衅感和群体认同的作用
收稿日期: 2022-12-10
网络出版日期: 2023-09-13
基金资助
陕西省社会科学基金项目(2020F013)；深圳人文社科重点研究基地民生幸福标杆研究中心课题(SZ2021B005)；深圳教育科学规划课题(bskt21001)
版权
Impact of Group Bragging Styles on Observers’ Cyberbullying: The Role of Observers’ Provocation and Group Identification
Received date: 2022-12-10
Online published: 2023-09-13
Copyright
高阳 , 倪士光 , 夏志远 , 田午林 . 群体夸耀方式对旁观者网络攻击行为的影响：旁观者的被挑衅感和群体认同的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(4) : 471 -478 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.006
Group bragging discourse in the online context often triggers dissatisfaction and even attacks from observers. However, the specific psychological mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we manipulated explicit/implicit expressions of group bragging in a virtual network interaction scenario to assess the provocation and cyberbullying behavior of observers after observing different modes of group bragging. The results revealed that: 1) compared to implicit bragging, explicit group bragging elicited a sense of provocation in observers, which in turn led to cyberbullying against the braggers; 2) observers’ group identification moderated the provocation caused by explicit group bragging, individuals with high group identification exhibited stronger feelings of provocation and engaged in more cyberbullying behavior in response to explicit group bragging, compared to those with low group identification. This research clarifies that observers perceive explicit group bragging as a threat to their own group identity, thereby expanding and deepening the hubris hypothesis theory.
Key words： group-bragging; hubris hypothesis; cyberbullying behavior; group identity
| 陈慧, 甘怡群, 温瑶, 刘鑫, 孙鉴. 中国人核心自我评价构念的实证研究. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46 (1): 141- 146. | |
| 丁甜. (2012). 大学生学校认同前因及结果的实证研究(硕士学位论文). 湘潭大学. | |
| 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. (2018). 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响: 反刍思维与网络道德的作用. 心理学报, 50(9), 1051–1060. | |
| 宋仕婕, 佐斌, 温芳芳, 谭潇. 群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响. 心理学报, 2020, 52 (8): 993- 1003. | |
| 温芳芳, 佐斌. 最简群体范式的操作、心理机制及新应用. 心理科学, 2018, 41 (3): 713- 719. | |
| 邢采, 刘婷婷, 张希. 危机情境下的亲社会行为: 求偶动机对危机救助意愿的影响. 心理科学, 2015, 38 (1): 172- 178. | |
| Alicke, M. D.. In defense of social comparison. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 2007, 20 (1): 11- 29. | |
| Chen, L., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O.. A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 2017, 19 (8): 1194- 1213. | |
| Choi, E. U., & Hogg, M. A.. Who do you think you are? Ingroup and outgroup sources of identity validation. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2020, 4 (3): 125- 134. | |
| Chow, R. M., Lowery, B. S., & Knowles, E. D.. The two faces of dominance: The differential effect of ingroup superiority and outgroup inferiority on dominant-group identity and group esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 44 (4): 1073- 1081. | |
| de Hoog, N.. Processing of social identity threats: A defense motivation perspective. Social Psychology, 2013, 44 (6): 361- 372. | |
| DeMarco, T. C., & Newheiser, A. K.. Attachment to groups: Relationships with group esteem, self-esteem, and investment in ingroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2019, 49 (1): 63- 75. | |
| Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Denissen, J. J. A.. Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2019, 23 (1): 48- 72. | |
| Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G.. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41 (4): 1149- 1160. | |
| Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press. | |
| Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J.. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2014, 67 (3): 451- 470. | |
| Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., & Brewer, M. B.. Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2017, 20 (5): 570- 581. | |
| Hoorens, V., Pandelaere, M., Oldersma, F., & Sedikides, C.. The hubris hypothesis: You can self-enhance, but you’d better not show it. Journal of Personality, 2012, 80 (5): 1237- 1274. | |
| Hoorens, V., van Damme, C., Helweg-Larsen, M., & Sedikides, C.. The hubris hypothesis: The downside of comparative optimism displays. Consciousness and Cognition, 2017, 50, 45- 55. | |
| Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J.. Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 2014, 65 (1): 461- 485. | |
| Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R.. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, 140 (4): 1073- 1137. | |
| Leary, M. R., Twenge, J. M., & Quinlivan, E.. Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, 10 (2): 111- 132. | |
| Li, Q.. New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 2007, 23 (4): 1777- 1791. | |
| Mio?evi?, M., Gonzalez, O., Valente, M. J., & MacKinnon, D. P.. A tutorial in Bayesian potential outcomes mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2018, 25 (1): 121- 136. | |
| Paolini, S., & McIntyre, K.. Bad is stronger than good for stigmatized, but not admired outgroups: Meta-analytical tests of intergroup valence asymmetry in individual-to-group generalization experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2019, 23 (1): 3- 47. | |
| Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S.. Measuring cyberbullying: Implications for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2015, 23, 69- 74. | |
| Quarmley, M., Feldman, J., Grossman, H., Clarkson, T., Moyer, A., & Jarcho, J. M.. Testing effects of social rejection on aggressive and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 2021, 48 (2): 529- 545. | |
| Steinmetz, J., Sezer, O., & Sedikides, C.. Impression mismanagement: People as inept self-presenters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2017, 11 (6): e12321. | |
| Suler, J.. The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2004, 7 (3): 321- 326. | |
| Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S.. If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81 (6): 1058- 1069. | |
| van Damme, C., Deschrijver, E., van Geert, E., & Hoorens, V.. When praising yourself insults others: Self-superiority claims provoke aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2017, 43 (7): 1008- 1019. | |
| van Damme, C., Hoorens, V., & Sedikides, C.. Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claims. Self and Identity, 2016, 15 (2): 173- 190. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |