特约

中文阅读中词语加工与眼动控制整合模型简介

  • 陈汝淇 ,
  • 包亚倩 ,
  • 黄林洁琼 ,
  • 李兴珊
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所),北京 100101
    2. 中国科学院大学心理学系,北京 100049
李兴珊,E-mail:lixs@psych.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2023-08-07

  网络出版日期: 2024-01-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(32371156,31970992)

版权

《心理与行为研究》编辑部, 2023, 版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。

An Introduction to the Chinese Reading Model (CRM)

  • Ruqi CHEN ,
  • Yaqian BAO ,
  • Linjieqiong HUANG ,
  • Xingshan LI
Expand
  • 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2023-08-07

  Online published: 2024-01-24

Copyright

, 2023, Copyright reserved © 2023.

摘要

为方便读者理解近期发表的中文阅读词语加工和眼动控制整合模型(CRM),本文详细介绍该模型。模型包括词语加工和眼动控制模块。词语加工模块在交互激活框架基础上采纳了新的词切分假设:知觉广度范围内,汉字构成的所有词互相竞争并决出唯一胜者,当一个词被识别,它也同时被切分出来。眼动控制模块决定眼睛何时移动以及向何处移动,采用基于加工的假设。模型模拟了中文阅读与眼动控制的重要研究结果。模型着重解释了无词间空格时的词切分和眼跳目标选择等问题。

本文引用格式

陈汝淇 , 包亚倩 , 黄林洁琼 , 李兴珊 . 中文阅读中词语加工与眼动控制整合模型简介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(6) : 725 -735 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.002

Abstract

This paper is written in Chinese to help Chinese readers understand the recently published computational model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading, known as the Chinese Reading Model (CRM). The model consists of two modules: a word-processing module and an eye-movement control module. The word-processing module processes the information within the perceptual span. The module adopts an interactive activation framework and further introduces novel hypotheses regarding word segmentation. That is, all possible word candidates formed by the characters within the perceptual span compete for a single winner. Once a word is recognized, it is simultaneously segmented. The eye-movement control module uses the activation information from the word-processing module to decide when and where the eyes should move. It estimates how many Chinese characters can be processed in a single fixation and moves the eyes beyond these characters. The model successfully simulates important research findings in Chinese reading. It explains key issues, such as word segmentation and eye movement target selection when there are no explicit word boundary markers.

参考文献

申薇, 李兴珊. 中文阅读中词优效应的特异性. 科学通报, 2012, 57 (35): 3414- 3420.
  Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 2001, 108 (1): 204- 256.
  Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R.. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 2005, 112 (4): 777- 813.
  Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 272–281.
  Huang, L. J. Q., & Li, X. S.. Early, but not overwhelming: The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2020, 73 (9): 1382- 1395.
  Huang, L. J. Q., Staub, A., & Li, X. S.. Prior context influences lexical competition when segmenting Chinese overlapping ambiguous strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 2021, 118, 104218.
  Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M.. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998, 24 (1): 20- 34.
  Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. L.. Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 2005, 33 (8): 1345- 1356.
  Kliegl, R.. Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007, 136 (3): 530- 537.
  Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51(10), 1146–1156.
  Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 2020, 127 (6): 1139- 1162.
  Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R.. On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 2009, 58 (4): 525- 552.
  Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1229–1236.
  Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G. L., Bai, X. J., & Hy?n?, J.. Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 2016, 147, 1- 20.
  Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K.. Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2014, 40 (3): 1046- 1059.
  McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L.. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 1986, 18 (1): 1- 86.
  McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E.. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 1981, 88 (5): 375- 407.
  McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K.. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 8 (5): 365- 368.
  Rayner, K.. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 1979, 8 (1): 21- 30.
  Rayner, K.. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124 (3): 372- 422.
  Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 16(8), 829–837.
  Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981, 33 (4): 351- 373.
  Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K.. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 1998, 105 (1): 125- 157.
  Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R.. Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 2006, 7 (1): 34- 55.
  Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M.. OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 2018, 125 (6): 969- 984.
  Sun, F. C., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W.. Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 1985, 37 (6): 502- 506.
  Tsai, J. L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159–176). Oxford: Elsevier.
  Wei, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 2013, 80, 1- 6.
  Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H.. Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2010, 63 (4): 705- 725.
  Yang, J. M., Staub, A., Li, N., Wang, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2012). Plausibility effects when reading one- and two- character words: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1801–1809.
  Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Tsai, J. L.. Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading and Writing, 2012, 25 (5): 1007- 1029.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发