白学军, 胡笑羽, 闫国利. (2009). 非注视词特性对注视词加工作用的眼动研究. 心理科学, 32(2), 308–311
白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利. (2011). 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1721–1729
李玉刚, 黄忍, 滑慧敏, 李兴珊. (2017). 阅读中的眼跳目标选择问题. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 404–412
刘志方, 闫国利, 张智君, 潘运, 杨桂芳. (2013). 中文阅读中的预视效应与词切分. 心理学报, 45(6), 614–625
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1–11
王永胜, 何立媛. (2022). 双字词词频与尾字字频在老年读者眼跳目标选择中的作用. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 114–120. 2022-04-29 取自 https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=TJSS202203017&DbName=CJFQ2022
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589–605
赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 16(6), 721–734
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277–1287, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277.
Bates, D., M?chler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Drieghe, D., Fitzsimmons, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2017). Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 43(10), 1701–1716, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000441.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777–813, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439.
Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895–913, doi: 10.1037/a0033580.
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139–1162, doi: 10.1037/rev0000248.
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
Liu, Y. P., Huang, R., Li, Y. G., & Gao, D. G. (2017). The word frequency effect on saccade targeting during Chinese reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of saccade length. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 116, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00116.
Liu, Y. P., Yu, L. L., Fu, L., Li, W. W., Duan, Z. Y., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1367–1376.
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1409–1419, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000072.
Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 268–281, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.2.268.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65–81, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
Rayner K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506, doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129–1144, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445–476, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X03000104.
Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65(2), 177–206, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.001.
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5–35.
Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.005.
Shen, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2018). The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 131–139, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1270975.
Sheridan, H., Reichle, E. D., & Reingold, E. M. (2016). Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1543–1552.
Tsai, J. L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 17–23, doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.004.
Yan, G. L., Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259–268, doi: 10.1348/000712605X70066.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J. E., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669–1676, doi: 10.1037/a0019329.
Yang, J. M., Wang, S. P., Xu, Y. M., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1192–1204, doi: 10.1037/a0013554.
Zhu, M. Y., Zhuang, X. L., & Ma, G. J. (2021). Readers extract semantic information from parafoveal two-character synonyms in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 773–790, doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10092-8.
