*为纳入元分析文献
林崇德, 杨治良, 黄希庭. (2003). 心理学大辞典. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
林无忌, 孟迎芳, 林静远. (2017). 提取干扰对内隐记忆的影响. 心理学报, 49(7), 897–908
*毛伟宾. (2009). 编码阶段分散注意对错误记忆通道效应的影响. 心理科学, 32(6), 1345–1347
孟迎芳, 郭春彦. (2007). 编码与提取干扰对内隐和外显记忆的非对称性影响. 心理学报, 39(4), 579–588
*王宝玺, 唐晴, 芦婷, 向玲. (2020). 注意分散对老年人错误记忆的影响. 心理学探新, 40(5), 425–430
王福兴, 谢和平, 李卉. (2016). 视觉单通道还是视听双通道?——通道效应的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 335–350
*Acarturk, C., & Ozcelik, E. (2017). Secondary-task effects on learning with multimedia: An investigation through eye-movement analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 126–141.
*Anderson, N. D., Iidaka, T., Cabeza, R., Kapur, S., McIntosh, A. R., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding- and retrieval-related brain activity: A PET study of younger and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(5), 775–792.
*Bireta, T. J., & Mazzei, C. M. (2016). Does the isolation effect require attention? Memory & Cognition, 44(1), 1–14.
Blurton, S. P., Greenlee, M. W., & Gondan, M. (2014). Multisensory processing of redundant information in go/no-go and choice responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(4), 1212–1233.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
*Brewer, G. A., Ball, B. H., Knight, J. B., Dewitt, M. R., & Marsh, R. L. (2011). Divided attention interferes with fulfilling activity-based intentions. Acta Psychologica, 138(1), 100–105.
*Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2019). Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(10), 2474–2494.
*Castellà, J., Pina, R., Baqués, J., & Allen, R. J. (2020). Differential effects of working memory load on priming and recognition of real images. Memory & Cognition, 48(8), 1460–1471.
*Clark-Foos, A., & Marsh, R. L. (2008). Recognition memory for valenced and arousing materials under conditions of divided attention. Memory, 16(5), 530–537.
Clarys, D., Isingrini, M., & Haerty, A. (2000). Effects of attentional load and ageing on word-stem and word-fragment implicit memory tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 395–412.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 159–180.
*Dewhurst, S. A., Barry, C., Swannell, E. R., Holmes, S. J., & Bathurst, G. L. (2007). The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 660–667.
*Dudukovic, N. M., DuBrow, S., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering. Memory & Cognition, 37(7), 953–961.
*Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 155–176.
*Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2002). Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Memory & Cognition, 30(5), 731–744.
*Fernandes, M. A., Moscovitch, M., Ziegler, M., & Grady, C. (2005). Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1115–1127.
*Fernandes, M. A., Wammes, J. D., Priselac, S., & Moscovitch, M. (2016). Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition. Neuropsychologia, 90, 59–71.
Forsberg, A., Guitard, D., & Cowan, N. (2021). Working memory limits severely constrain long-term retention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(2), 537–547.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychological Science, 17(6), 526–534.
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505.
*Gaspelin, N., Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2013). Divided attention: An undesirable difficulty in memory retention. Memory & Cognition, 41(7), 978–988.
Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. X. (2019). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 395–408.
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 45–53.
Greene, N. R., Martin, B. A., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2021). The effects of divided attention at encoding and at retrieval on multidimensional source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(11), 1870–1887.
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560.
Hubbard, R. J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2021). Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension. Brain Research, 1764, 147466.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306–340.
*Keane, M. M., Cruz, M. E., & Verfaellie, M. (2015). Attention and implicit memory: Priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements. Memory & Cognition, 43(2), 216–225.
*Kern, R. P., Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., & Holmes, K. (2005). Emotional stimuli, divided attention, and memory. Emotion, 5(4), 408–417.
*McCabe, D. P., Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2011). Automatic processing influences free recall: Converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 389–402.
*McGann, D., Ellis, J. A., & Milne, A. (2002). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: Differential influence of attentional resources. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1021–1032.
*Middlebrooks, C. D., Kerr, T., & Castel, A. D. (2017). Selectively distracted: Divided attention and memory for important information. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1103–1115.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Mulligan, N. W., Buchin, Z. L., & West, J. T. (2022). Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(12), 1905–1922.
*Mulligan, N. W., & Picklesimer, M. (2016). Attention and the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(6), 938–950.
*Mulligan, N. W., & Spataro, P. (2015). Divided attention can enhance early-phase memory encoding: The attentional boost effect and study trial duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1223–1228.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Brubaker, M. S. (2019). Are the effects of divided attention on memory encoding processes due to the disruption of deep-level elaborative processes? Evidence from cued- and free-recall tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 108–117.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 965–976.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., & Kreuger, S. (2005). Divided attention in younger and older adults: Effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 520–537.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J., Hara, Y., Brubaker, M. S., & Lowenschuss-Erlich, I. (2014). The effects of divided attention on encoding processes under incidental and intentional learning instructions: Underlying mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1682–1696.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J., & Shulman, S. (2004). Older adults’ associative deficit in episodic memory: Assessing the role of decline in attentional resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1067–1073.
*Naveh-Benjamin, M., Kilb, A., & Fisher, T. (2006). Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: Further support for an asymmetry. Memory & Cognition, 34(1), 90–101.
Nieznański, M. (2013). Effects of resource demanding processing on context memory for context-related versus context-unrelated items. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 745–758.
*Peng, Y. P., & Tullis, J. G. (2021). Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(6), 2064–2074.
*Peters, M. J. V., Jelicic, M., Gorski, B., Sijstermans, K., Giesbrecht, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2008). The corrective effects of warning on false memories in the DRM paradigm are limited to full attention conditions. Acta Psychologica, 129(2), 308–314.
*Rawlinson, H. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2021). In search of the proximal cause of the animacy effect on memory: Attentional resource allocation and semantic representations. Memory & Cognition, 49(6), 1137–1152.
*Risko, E. F., Buchanan, D., Medimorec, S., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures. Computers & Education, 68, 275–283.
*Rossi-Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., Costanzi, M., Saraulli, D., & Cestari, V. (2018). Divided attention enhances the recognition of emotional stimuli: Evidence from the attentional boost effect. Memory, 26(1), 42–52.
*Sacher, M., Isingrini, M., & Taconnat, L. (2013). Effects of aging and divided attention on episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 144(2), 258–263.
*Sahakyan, L., & Malmberg, K. J. (2018). Divided attention during encoding causes separate memory traces to be encoded for repeated events. Journal of Memory and Language, 101, 153–161.
*Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Woo, E. (2007). Effects of age and divided attention on memory components derived for the category exemplar generation task. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(3), 274–300.
*Secer, I., & Yılmazoğulları, Y. (2016). Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 117–122.
*Skinner, E. I., Fernandes, M. A., & Grady, C. L. (2009). Memory networks supporting retrieval effort and retrieval success under conditions of full and divided attention. Experimental Psychology, 56(6), 386–396.
*Steinmetz, K. R. M., Waring, J. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2014). The effect of divided attention on emotion-induced memory narrowing. Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 881–892.
Stillman, C. M., Coane, J. H., Profaci, C. P., Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (2014). The effects of healthy aging on the mnemonic benefit of survival processing. Memory & Cognition, 42(2), 175–185.
Tombu, M., & Seiffert, A. E. (2008). Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking. Cognition, 108(1), 1–25.
*Tse, C. S., Chan, M. H. M., Tse, W. S., & Wong, S. W. H. (2019). Can the testing effect for general knowledge facts be influenced by distraction due to divided attention or experimentally induced anxious mood? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 969.
*Wallace, W. P., Shaffer, T. R., Amberg, M. D., & Silvers, V. L. (2001). Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1102–1110.
*Weeks, J. C., & Hasher, L. (2017). Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1268–1273.
*Wimmer, M. C., & Howe, M. L. (2010). Are children’s memory illusions created differently from those of adults? Evidence from levels-of-processing and divided attention paradigms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 31–49.
Wong, B. I., Lecompte, M., & Yang, L. X. (2021). The age-related associative deficit simulated by relational divided attention: Encoding strategy and recollection. Memory, 29(3), 406–415.
*Yang, L. X., Truong, L., Fuss, S., & Bislimovic, S. (2012). The effects of ageing and divided attention on the self-reference effect in emotional memory: Spontaneous or effortful mnemonic benefits. Memory, 20(6), 596–607.
Yang, L. X., Truong, L., & Li, L. Q. (2021). Survival processing effect in memory under semantic divided attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(3), 299–306.
Yeung, R. C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2021). Divided attention at encoding or retrieval interferes with emotionally enhanced memory for words. Memory, 29(3), 284–297.
