对乙肝患者群体认知的矛盾态度：行为与ERP证据

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用GNAT范式并结合事件相关电位（ERP）,考查不同矛盾状态（高矛盾VS低矛盾）被试对特殊群体的态度及其在行为、脑加工机制上的差异。结果表明：（1）个体对于乙肝患者存在矛盾态度;（2）高、低矛盾被试对乙肝患者的态度差异,主要表现在积极维度而非消极维度上。（3）N270的出现及LPC的差异表明,矛盾态度的加工是个体根据背景对预存性评价予以修正的过程。

关键词: 矛盾态度, 事件相关电位, N270, LPC

Abstract: Combining with GNAT paradigm and ERP, the different attitudes of subjects with were explored different ambivalence degree(high ambivalence VS. low ambivalence)toward special groups, and their differences in behavior and brain mechanism. The results show:(1)different attitudinal ambivalence toward hepatitis B patients is individual concurrent positive and negative evaluation to one object.(2)The different attitudes of subjects with different ambivalence degree mainly represent in positive dimension, but not in negative dimension.(3)The evidences of N270 appearance and LPC difference suggest that processing attitudinal ambivalence is the process of individual correcting one′s stored evaluation according to context.

Key words: attitudinal ambivalence, event-related potential(ERP), N270, LPC

中图分类号:

B848.3

钟毅平,谢四元,周路平. 对乙肝患者群体认知的矛盾态度：行为与ERP证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(4): 241-246.

Zhong Yiping,Xie Siyuan,Zhou Luping. THE ATTITUDINAL AMBIVALENCE OF COGNITION TO HEPATITIS B PATIENTS GROUP: EVIDENCE FROM BEHAVIOR AND ERP[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(4): 241-246.

参考文献

[1] Hodson G, Maio G R, Esses V M. The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2001, 23(3): 197-205
[2] Petty R E, Tormala Z L, Brinol P, et al. Implicit ambivalence form attitude change: An exploration of PAST model. Journal personality and social psychology, 2006, 90(1): 21-41
[3] Petty R E, Wheeler S C, Tormala Z L. Persuasion and attitude change// Millon T, Lerner M J. Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003, 353-382
[4] Mucchl-Faina A, Costarelli S, Romoli C. The effects of intergroup context of evaluation on ambivalence toward the intergroup and outgroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2002, 32(2): 247-259
[5] Priester J M, Petty R E. Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80: 19-34
[6] 吴明证, 梁宁建, 许静, 等. 内隐社会态度的矛盾现象研究. 心理科学, 2004, 27(2): 281-283
[7] Thompson M M, Zanna M P, Griffin D W. Let′s not be indifferent about(attitudinal)ambivalence//Petty R E, Krosnick J A. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995, 361-386
[8] 董艳娟, 王玉平, 王荫华, 等. 大脑对早期、晚期冲突信息处理的事件相关电位研究. 临床神经电生理杂志. 2006, 15(3): 136-141
[9] Cui L L, Wang Y P, Wang H J, et al. Human brain sub-systems for discrimination of visual shapes. Neuroreport, 2001, 11: 2415-2418
[10] Wang Y P, Wang H J, Cui L L, et al. The N270 component of the event-related potential reflects superamodel conflict processing. Neurosci Lett, 2002, 332: 25-28
[11] Nosek B A, Banaji M R. The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 2001, 19(6): 625-664
[12] Fazio R H, Olson M A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003, 54: 297-327
[13] Wilson T D, Lindsey S, Schooler T Y. A Model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 2000, 107: 101-126
[14] 耿晓伟, 郑全全. 中国文化中自尊结构的内隐社会认知研究. 心理科学, 2005, 28(2): 379-382
[15] 蔡华俭. 内隐自尊效应及内隐自尊与外显自尊的关系. 心理学报, 2003, 35(6): 796-801
[16] 蔡华俭. 泛文化的自尊——基于中国大学生的研究证据. 心理学报, 2006, 38(6): 902-909
[17] Duckworth K L, Bargh J A, Garcia M, et al. The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 2002, 13: 513-519
[18] Ferguson M J, Bargh J A. The constructive nature of automatic evaluation// Musch J, Klauer K C. The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Process in Cognition and Emotion. NJ: Erlbaum, 2002
[19] Greenwald A G, Farham S D. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(6): 1022-1038
[20] Greenwald A G, Banaji M R, Rudman L A, et al. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self concept. Psychological Review, 2002, 109: 3-25
[21] Fazio R H, Jackson J R, Dunton B C, et al. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial stereotypes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of personality and social psychology, 1995, 69: 1013-1027
[22] Payne B K, Jacoby L L, Lambert A J. Attitudes as accessibility bias: Dissociating automatic and controlled processes// Hassin R R, Uleman J S, Bargh J A. The New Unconscious. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2005. 393-420
[23] Alexandru C, Hirst W. Implicit theories and context in personal recollection: Romanians′ recall of their political and economic past. Cognitive psychology, 2001, 15: 45-60
[24] 于广涛. 态度强度对态度背景效应的影响研究. 山东: 山东师范大学硕士学位论文, 2001
[25] 刘永芳. 归因过程“背景效应假设”的初步实验研究. 心理科学, 1997, 20(1): 61-64
[26] 樊晓红, 周爱保. 内隐社会认知: 社会决策的个人背景效应. 心理科学, 2002, 25(6): 690-696