类别指称对象提取过程的眼动研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2004, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3): 539-544.

类别指称对象提取过程的眼动研究

张兴利¹,白学军²,阎国利²

1 中国科学院心理研究所,北京 100101;
2 天津师范大学心理与行为研究中心,天津 300074

收稿日期:2004-08-15 出版日期:2004-09-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:张兴利,女,中国科学院心理研究所博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地01JAZJDXLX003和02JAZJDXLX003重大项目和全国教育科学“十五”规划国家青年基金CBA010122项目资助

THE EYE MOVEMENT RESEARCH ON THE PROCESSES OF ACCESSING THE CATEGORICAL REFERENTS

Zhang Xingli¹,Bai Xuejun²,Yan Guoli²

1 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
2 Research Center of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074

Received:2004-08-15 Online:2004-09-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用眼动记录法,探讨了语篇理解中类别指称对象的可提取性。实验采用3（实验材料：指称对象、非指称对象、特别控制条件）×2（兴趣区：兴趣区1、兴趣区2）×2（工作记忆容量：高、低）3因素混合设计。通过分析第一次注视时间、总的阅读时间和回视次数等眼动指标发现,类别指称对象提取过程中包含激活和抑制两种过程。被试在阅读完上指示表达之后,立即激活了可能的指称对象,但是对非指称对象的抑制却发生在后来的整合过程中;高工作记忆容量的被试能更有效地抑制非指称对象,更容易形成语篇的完整表征,有效提取类别指称对象。

关键词: 类别指称对象, 工作记忆, 激活, 抑制

Abstract: Using ASL 504 Model eye-tracker system, the study investigated accessibility of the categorical referents during discourse comprehension. We conducted a 3 factors design by the conbination of 3（material condition）×2（area of interest）×2（working memory capacity）. The first pass time, the total pass time and the regression out times were analyzed. The result revealed that activation and inhibition were involved in the processes of the accessing the categorical referents. After reading the anaphor, the participants activated the potential referents immediately, inhibited the nonreferents in the integration later. The participants with higher working memory capacity inhibited the nonreferents more effectively.

Key words: Key Words:categorical referents, working memory, activation, inhibition

中图分类号:

B842.1

张兴利,白学军,阎国利. 类别指称对象提取过程的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(3): 539-544.

Zhang Xingli,Bai Xuejun,Yan Guoli. THE EYE MOVEMENT RESEARCH ON THE PROCESSES OF ACCESSING THE CATEGORICAL REFERENTS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2004, 2(3): 539-544.

参考文献

[1] Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 1988, 95: 163~182
[2] Gernsbacer M A. Language Comprehension as Structure Building.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990
[3] Gernsbacher M A. Attenuating interference during comprehen- sion: The role of suppression. In: Medin D L. (Ed.), the psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego.CA: Academic Press, 1997. 85~104
[4] Gernsbacher M A. Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 1989, 32: 99~156
[5] Long D L, Chong J L. Comprehension skill and global cohe- rence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehender's ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27(6): 1424~1429
[6] Barrouillet P, Camos V. Developmental increase in working me-mory span: resource sharing or temporal decay? Journal of Memory and Language, 2001, 45(1): 1~20
[7] MacDonald M C, MacWhinney B. Measuring inhibition and faci-litation from pronouns. Journal of Memory & Language, 1990, 29: 469~492
[8] Wiley J, Mason R A, Myers J L. Accessibility of potential referents following categorical anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27: 1238~1249
[9] 白学军, 张兴利. 语篇理解时类别指称对象提取的心理机制研究. 心理科学, 2003, 26（6）: 1004~1007
[10] Daneman M, Carpenter P A. Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980, 19: 450~466
[11] 李晓庆, 杨玉芳. 语篇中指代词的分布规律与心理机制. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12（1）: 1~9
[12] 阎国利. 眼动分析法在心理学研究中的应用（修订版）. 天津: 天津教育出版社, 2004. 75~76
[13] Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information proc- essing: 20 Years of Research, Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124(3): 372~422
[14] Brewin C R, Beaton A. Thought suppression, intelligence, and working memory capacity, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2002, 40: 923~930
[15] Leea M J, Matthew C T. The effects of three different computer texts on readers' recall: based on working memory capacity, Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19: 767~783