生存加工的编码和提取双重优势效应：ERP证据

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 470-477.

生存加工的编码和提取双重优势效应：ERP证据

周宗泽, 贺金波, 郭永玉

青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室暨华中师范大学心理学院，人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室，武汉 430079

收稿日期:2012-11-23 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 贺金波，男，华中师范大学心理学院副教授，博士。E-mail:hjb@mail.ccnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:周宗泽，男，华中师范大学心理学院硕士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究12YJA190006项目的资助。

Binary Advantages of Encoding and Retrieval in Survival Processing：Evidence form ERP

Zhou Zongze, He Jinbo, Guo Yongyu

Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079

Received:2012-11-23 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生存加工比控制条件有更好的记忆表现，产生稳定的记忆优势，这就是记忆生存优势。已有研究多采用行为学实验验证了此现象的存在，但没有确定该优势发生在记忆的何种阶段。本研究采用ERP技术和“间接学习-再认”实验范式，比较被试在生存情境、迁徙情境和愉悦判断中对词汇编码和提取过程的记忆加工，结果发现：在500-700ms时间段，生存情境的相继记忆效应显著大于迁徙情境和愉悦判断；在400-600ms时间段，生存情境的新旧效应显著大于迁徙情境和愉悦判断。表明生存加工具有编码和提取双重优势。

关键词: 生存, 记忆, ERP, 编码优势, 提取优势

Abstract: Memory performance is better in survival processing procedure than other processing procedures, which is named as survival advantage of memory. All the former studies were behavioral studies, whereby the researchers could not identify in which stage of memory process the advantage lies. The present study applies the Event-related-potentials(ERP)technology to explore in which stage(s)the survival advantage occurs, with using the “Indirect study-recognition”paradigm. Through comparing the processing of survival scenario, moving scenario and pleasantness scenario in encoding and retrieval stages, we found that the DM effect is more significant in the survival scenario than the moving and pleasantness scenarios during the time window of 500ms-700ms. The ON effect is more significant in the survival scenario than the moving and pleasantness scenarios during the time window of 400ms-600ms. These results indicated that there were both encoding advantage and retrieval advantage during the survival processing.

Key words: survival, memory, ERP, encoding advantage, retrieval advantage

中图分类号:

B842.3

周宗泽, 贺金波, 郭永玉. 生存加工的编码和提取双重优势效应：ERP证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 470-477.

Zhou Zongze, He Jinbo, Guo Yongyu. Binary Advantages of Encoding and Retrieval in Survival Processing：Evidence form ERP[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 470-477.

参考文献

1 傅成.(2010). 记忆的适应性研究. 华东师范大学硕士学位论文.
2 李宏利, 周宗泽, 徐董军.(2009). 记忆的生存假设. 心理与行为研究, 7(3), 231-235.
3 李荆广.(2009). 人们是否会更好地记住涉及生存的信息?—从进化视角分析记忆功能. 华东师范大学硕士学位论文.
4 李荆广, 郭秀艳.(2009). 记忆研究的功能取向. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 923-930.
5 刘源, 梁南元, 王德进, 张社英, 杨铁英, 揭春雨, 等.(1990). 现代汉语常用词词频词典(音序部分). 北京: 宇航出版社.
6 刘聪慧, 郭春彦, 丁锦红, 俞国良.(2008). 字频和预存表征对相继记忆效应的影响. 心理学报, 40(6), 662-670.
7 孟迎芳.(2006). 内隐记忆和外显记忆编码与提取关系研究. 首都师范大学博士学位论文.
8 孟迎芳, 郭春彦.(2006). 内隐记忆和外显记忆的脑机制分离：面孔再认的ERP研究. 心理学报, 38(1), 15-21.
9 孟迎芳, 郭春彦.(2009). 内隐与外显记忆的编码与提取非对称性关系. 心理学报, 41(8), 694-705.
10聂爱情, 郭春彦, 沈模卫.(2008). 听觉来源提取的材料差异性: 来自ERP的证据. 科学通报, 53(14), 1664-1672.
11 屈南, 郭春彦, 聂爱情, 丁锦红.(2005). 提取方式对相继记忆效应的影响. 心理学报, 37(1), 26-33.
12 王国恩, 吕勇, 胡伟, 沈德立.(2010). 12-13岁儿童数字编码和提取的ERP研究. 心理科学, 33(4), 848-852.
13 Burns, D. J., Burns, S. A., & Hwang, A. J.(2011). Adaptive memory: Determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 206-218.
14 Cycowicz, Y. M.(2010). Memory development and event-related brain potentials in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 145-174.
15 Eppinger, B., Herbert, M., & Kray, J.(2010). We remember the good things: Age differences in learning and memory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93(4), 515-521.
16 Habib, R., Nyberg, L., & Tulving, E.(2003). Hemispheric asymmetries of memory: the HERA model revisited. Trends cognition Science, 7(6), 241-245.
17 Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Cohen, S. M.(2008). The mnemonic advantage of processing fitness-relevant information. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1151-1156.
18 Kim, A. S. N., Vallesi, A., Picton, T. W., & Tulving, E.(2009). Cognitive association formation in episodic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 3162-3173.
19 Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H.(2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115-134.
20 Langeslag, S. J. E., & Van Strien, J. W.(2008). Age differences in the emotional modulation of ERP old/new effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70(2), 105-114.
21 Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S.(2008). Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377-385.
22 Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S.(2010). Adaptive memory: Ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing. Cognitive Psychology, 61(1), 1-22.
23 Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Gregory, K. J., & Van Arsdall, J. E.(2009). Adaptive memory: Fitness Relevance and the Hunter-Gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 20, 740-746.
24 Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R.(2008). Adaptive memory: The Comparative Value of Survival Processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176-180.
25 Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S.(2007). Adaptive memory: Survival Processing Enhances Retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 33(2), 263-273.
26 Nairne, J. S., Van Arsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R.(2012). Adaptive Memory: Enhanced Location Memory After Survival Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 38(2), 495-501.
27 Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N.(2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence form divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 965-976.
28 Nowicka, A., Jednoróg, K., Wypych, M., & Marchewka, A.(2009). Reversed old/new effect for intentionally forgotten words: An ERP study of directed forgetting. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71(2), 97-102.
29 Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Verschuere, B., Galliot, A-M., et al.(2011). Adaptive memory: Stereotype activation is not enough. Memory & cognition. Open access at springerlink.com.
30 Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & Van Bergen, S.(2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23-28.
31 Otgaar, H., & Smeets, T.(2010). Adaptive Memory: Survival Processing Increases Both True and False Memory in Adults and Children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 36(4), 1010-1016.
32 Paller, K. A., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C.(1988). ERPs predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance. Biological Psychology, 26(1-3), 269-276.
33 Savine, A. C., Scullin, M. K., & Roediger, H. L. III.(2011). Survival processing of faces. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1359-1373.
34 Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., & Houle, S.(1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 2016-2020.
35 Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L.(2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 913-919.

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[4]	周爱保, 赵海燕, 夏瑞雪, 袁月, 贾婷婷, 谢珮. 不同语义水平下参照方式、情绪效价和特质评价对记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 145-152.
[5]	刘旭, 蔡佳, 崔喆, 宋美含, 王力. 项目竞争强度对网络成瘾大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 8-14.
[6]	王家慰, 冼美君, 邢强. 任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 15-21.
[7]	张政华, 张航, 王兵, 郑子龙, 赵黎明, 李卫君. 不同任务下声调和韵母在诗句中的加工过程——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 728-735.
[8]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[9]	李昀松, 陈启杨, 吴岩, 李天虹, 段如君. 形旁在形声字识别中的优势作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[10]	江黛苔, 段亚杰, 严帅, 付思文, 刘伟. 事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 312-318.
[11]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[12]	张嘉欣, 陈璇, 钱彬彬, 韩丹, 王璐, 张智君. 事件切割对时距知觉的影响：基于记忆碎片效应的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 145-151.
[13]	杜夏雨, 史从戎, 赵子仪, 薛婷. 情绪效价和动机情绪对创造力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 160-165.
[14]	孙霁, 孙沛. 大小数量加工机制分离现象的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 1-7.
[15]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.