不同类别学习策略下的中医诊断学习:以舌诊学习为例

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 728-731.

不同类别学习策略下的中医诊断学习:以舌诊学习为例

孙红梅^{1, 2}, 阴国恩¹, 陈雪莹¹

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074;
2 天津中医药大学人文管理学院,天津 300073

收稿日期:2013-04-06 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 阴国恩,男,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院教授,博士生导师。E-mail:yinguoen@gmail.com。
作者简介:孙红梅,女,天津师范大学心理与行为研究院博士生,天津中医药大学讲师。
基金资助:
本研究得到天津市哲学社会科学研究规划一般项目(TJJX11-067)的资助。

Influence of Different Type of Category Learning in Chinese Diagnostics: A Case Study of Tongue Diagnosis

Sun Hongmei ^1,2, Yin Guoen¹, Chen Xueying¹

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2 College of Humanities and Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300073

Received:2013-04-06 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨分析和非分析两种类别学习策略对中医舌诊学习效果的影响。以61名大学生为被试,运用“限定分类学习”范式进行舌诊学习实验。结果表明,即时测验中分析策略的诊断正确率显著高于非分析策略,但分析策略的遗忘量显著大于非分析策略;不管即时测验还是2周后测验,分析策略组的信心评价都显著高于非分析策略组。研究认为分析策略比非分析策略学习效果更好,但非分析策略保持效果更好,不容易遗忘。

关键词: 类别学习, 分析策略, 非分析策略, 中医舌诊

Abstract: This paper investigated influence of analytic reasoning and non-analytic reasoning of the category learning in Tongue inspection in traditional Chinese medicine. The paradigms of limited classification learning was used, and subjects consisted of 61 undergraduate students. The results showed that:Percentage Correct Diagnoses of analytic reasoning was significantly higher than non-analytic reasoning in the immediate condition, and the forgetting of analytic reasoning was significantly greater than non-analytic reasoning. Moreover, in confidence evaluation,analytic reasoning was significantly higher than non-analytic reasoning in the immediate condition and 2-week delay condition. The learning effect of the group who applied to analytic reasoning was better than that of the group who were applied non-analytic reasoning, but non-analytic reasoning maintain the knowledge better than analytic reasoning.

Key words: category learning, analytic reasoning, non-analytic reasoning, Tongue inspection in traditional Chinese medicine.

中图分类号:

B842.3

孙红梅, 阴国恩, 陈雪莹. 不同类别学习策略下的中医诊断学习:以舌诊学习为例[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 728-731.

Sun Hongmei , Yin Guoen, Chen Xueying. Influence of Different Type of Category Learning in Chinese Diagnostics: A Case Study of Tongue Diagnosis[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 728-731.

参考文献

郭秀艳. (2004).内隐学习和外显学习关系评述. 心理科学进展,12(2),185-192.
贾宁,代景华.(2011).元记忆监测错误的修正.心理研究,4(2),49-56.
李乃民,张大鹏,王宽全.(2006).舌诊学.学苑出版社,49-83.
宋天斌. (1994).实用中医舌诊彩色图谱.安徽科学技术出版社,46-78.
孙睦. (2007).现代中医诊断和西医诊断的比较与思考.中华现代中医学杂志, 3 (3),214-215.
阴国恩,丁小斌.(2008). 不同类别学习任务的差异.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 26(4),61-67.
张奇,刘万伦. (2007). 类别学习多重系统理论的研究与展望.心理科学进展,15(1),78-87.
Ark, T. K., Brooks, L. R., & Eva, K.W. (2006).Giving learners the best of both worlds: do clinical teachers need to guard against teaching pattern recognition to novices? Academic Medicine,81(4),405-409.
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., & Turken, A. U., et al. (1998).A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105(3), 442-481.
Brooks, L. R., Norman, G. R., & Allen, S.W. (1991).Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120(3),278-287.
Coderre, S., Mandin, H., & Harasym, P. H., et al.(2003).Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education, 37(8),695-703.
Evans, J. S.(2008).Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 59(1),255-278.
Friedman, C. P., Elstein A. E., & Wolf F.M., et al. (1999).Enhancement of clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation. A multisite study of 2 systems. The journal of the American Medical Association,282(19) ,1851-1856.
Kruschke, J. K. ( 2005). Category learning. In: K. Lamberts, & R. Goldston,(Eds.), The handbook of cognition. London:Sage, 183-201.
Norman, G. R. (2009). Dual processing and diagnostic errors. Advances in health sciences education,14(1),37-49.
Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I.,& Jenkins H. M.(1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs,75(13),1-42.
Vincent, F. J., & Todd, M. W. (2004).A quantitative Model- Based approach to examining aging effects on information - integration category learning. Psychology and Aging, 19(1),171-182.
Woods, N. N., Brooks, L. R. & Norman, G. R. (2005).The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis: creating coherence among signs and symptoms.Medical Education, 39(1),107-112.

[1]	王家慰, 邓泳珊, 邢强. 学习顺序和材料相似性对听觉类别学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 750-755.
[2]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[3]	陈琳，钟罗金，李悠，莫雷. 特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 577-582.
[4]	陈琳, 钟罗金, 郑允佳, 莫雷. 类别学习中的认知学习机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 305-311.
[5]	刘亚军阴国恩杨会会. 观察式学习条件下类别维度与家族相似性类别学习[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 38-41.