遥远距离联想任务脑机制的ERP研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术对中文遥远距离联想任务中的问题解决过程进行了研究。结果表明,在800-1600ms的时间窗口中,顿悟条件(强烈的“啊哈”体验)比非顿悟条件(没有“啊哈”体验)诱发出更负性脑电成分(LNC1),偶极子源分析表明LNC1起源于左侧前额叶皮层(PFC)和前扣带回(ACC),它可能与顿悟问题解决过程中心理定势的打破有关。之后,在1800-2300ms的时间窗口中,相比于非顿悟条件,顿悟条件下观察到了一个波幅更大的晚期负性成分(LNC2),偶极子源分析表明LNC1起源于楔前叶,它可能反映了新异联结的形成过程。

关键词: 顿悟, 遥远距离联想, 事件相关电位(ERPs)

Abstract: The electrophysiological correlates of Chinese compound remote associate problems solving were studied using event-related potentials (ERPs). Results showed that Insight condition (strong Aha feeling) elicited a more negative ERP deflection (LNC1) than did Non-Insight condition (no Aha feeling) in the time window of 800-1600ms. Dipole source analysis showed that the generators of LNC1 were localized in the left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which might be related to break mental sets during insight problem solving. Then, a greater slow negative ERP deflection (LNC2) in Insight condition as compared to Non-Insight condition was observed in the time window of 1800-2300ms. Dipole source analysis showed that the generator of LNC2 was localized in the precuneus, which might be involved in forming novel associations.

Key words: insight, compound remote associate problems, event-related potentials (ERPs).

中图分类号:

B842.1

谭钢, 侯玉玲, 曹智鹏. 遥远距离联想任务脑机制的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 746-751.

Tan Gang, Hou Yuling, Cao Zhipeng. Neural Correlates of Compound Remote Associate Problems: An ERP Study[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 746-751.

参考文献

张庆林,邱江,曹贵康. (2004) . 顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想. 心理科学,27 (6) ,1435-1437.
邱江,张庆林.(2007).字谜解决中的“啊哈”效应:来自ERP研究的证据.科学通报,52(22) ,2625-2631.
Andrea, E.C., & Michael R.T. (2006) . The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129(3),564-583.
Arne, D., & Riam, K. (2010) . A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5) ,822-848.
Berti, S., Geissler, H.G., Lachmann, T., & Mecklinger, A. (2000) . Event-related brain potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorial and identical comparison conditions. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 147-155.
Bowden, E.M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J., & Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in cognitive Sciences,9, 322-328.
Bowden, E.M., & Jung-Beeman, M., (2003) . Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 10, 730-737.
Bowden, E.M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007) . Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods , 42, 87-99.
Dobbins, I.G., Rice, H.J., Wagner, A.D., & Schacter, D.L. (2003). Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition. Neuropsychologia,41, 318-333.
Duncker, K. (1945) . On problem solving. Psychological Monographs,58, 1-113.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E.M., Haberman, J, et al. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. Plos Biology, 2 (4) , 500-510.
Kohler, W. (1925) . The mentality of apes. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Luks, T.L., Simpson, G.V., Feiwell, R.J., & Miller, W.L. (2002) . Evidence for anterior cingulate cortex involvement in monitoring preparatory attentional set.Neuroimage,17, 792-802.
Luo, J., & Niki, K. (2003) . The function of hippocampus in insight of problem solving.Hippocampus, 13, 274-281.
Luo, J., Niki, K., & Phillips, S. (2004) . Neural correlates of the Aha! Reaction.NeuroReport,15, 2013-2017.
MacDonald, A.W., Cohen, J.D., Stenger, V.A., & Carter, C.S. (2000) . Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortexin cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
Mai, X.Q., & Luo, J., Wu, J.H., Luo, Y.J. (2004) . ‘Aha!’ effects in a guessing riddle task: An event-related potential study. Human Brain Mapping, 22, 261-270.
Mecklinger, A., & Pfeifer, E. (1996) . Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 211-224.
Milham, M.P., Banich, M.T., Claus, E.D., & Cohen, N.J. (2003). Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control. Neuroimage,18, 483-493.
Mulert, C., Menzinger, E., Leicht, G., Pogarell, O., & Hegerl, U. (2005) . Evidence for a close relationship between conscious effort and anterior cingulate cortex activity. Int.J.Psychophysi, 56, 5-80.
Nyberg, L., Persson, J., Habib, R., et al. (2000) . Large scale neurocognitive networks underlying episodic memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 163-173.
Qiu, J., Li, H., Yang, D., et al. (2008) . The neural basis of insight problem solving: An event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition,61(1) , 100-106.
Ruchkin, D.S., Johnson J.R., Grafman, J., et al. (1992) . Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research,1, 53-66.
Rugg, M.D., Fletcher, P.C., Allan, K., et al. (1998) . Neural correlates of memory retrieval during recognition memory and cued recall. NeuroImage, 8, 262-273.
Thompson-Schill, S.L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G.K., & Farah, M.J. (1997) . Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex inretrieval o fsemantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,94, 14792-14797.
Wang, T., Zhang, Q.L., Li, H., et al. (2009) . The time course of chinese riddles solving: Evidence from an ERP study. Behavioural Brain Research,199, 278-282.
Tulving, E. (2002) . Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology,53, 1-25.
VanVeen, V., & Carter, C.S. (2002) . The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 477-482.

[1]	李文福, 翟吉存, 李青青, 陈井婷. 自我损耗对科学发明问题解决中原型启发效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 677-683.
[2]	李骋诗, 白学军, 王永胜. 映射具体性和语境线索对新颖隐喻加工的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 153-160.
[3]	王硕阳, 林崇德, 孙汉银. 创造性问题解决中的联想能力及其作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 8-16.
[4]	吕凯. 顿悟问题解决中抑制功能的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 219-227.
[5]	邱桂凤，张庆林. 反应与刺激冲突的脑机制差异:来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 583-587.
[6]	蔡晓红，邓娜丽，代晓庆，李姗，黄籍毅，曾晓青. 推理能力、认知方式和启发量对顿悟问题解决不同阶段的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 484-489.
[7]	邢强；张忠炉. 猜谜作业中的ERP效应：基于催化范式的证据[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 37-42.
[8]	姚海娟,沈德立. 启发信息对个体顿悟问题解决影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(3): 207-212.
[9]	杜英春, 吕勇. 面孔加工特异性的事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(4): 268-274.
[10]	姚海娟,沈德立. 顿悟问题解决的心理机制的验证性研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(3): 188-193.