视觉选择性注意对注意缺损多动障碍儿童数字距离效应的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 41-48.

视觉选择性注意对注意缺损多动障碍儿童数字距离效应的影响*

潘运^1,2, 罗叶双^1,2, 王馨³, 赵守盈^1,2,

1 贵州师范大学教育科学学院,贵阳 550001
2 贵州省普通高校基础心理与认知神经科学特色重点实验室,贵阳 550001
3 北京大学国际医院,北京 102206

收稿日期:2016-07-02 出版日期:2017-01-20 发布日期:2017-03-02
通讯作者: 赵守盈,E-mail: zhaoshouying@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31260234）和贵州省科学技术基金项目（黔科合J字[2013]2210号）

Research on Endogenous and Exogenous Attention Affected ADHD Children' Number Distance Effect of Number Processing

Pan Yun^1,2, Luo Yeshuang^1,2, Wang Xin³, Zhao Shouying^1,2

1 School of Educational Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001;
2 Key Laboratory of Basic Psychological and Cognitive Neuroscience, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001;
3 International Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 102206

Received:2016-07-02 Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用Posner的内源性和外源性线索实验范式,材料为1~9的阿拉伯数字（不包括5）,以判断目标数字是否大于5为任务,考察视觉选择性注意中的内源性注意和外源性注意对注意缺陷型多动障碍儿童（ADHD）数字加工距离效应的影响。结果发现：（1）内源性和外源性注意条件下,正常儿童在数字判断加工任务中的反应时短于ADHD儿童;（2）内源性有效线索提示条件下,ADHD儿童和正常儿童均表现出显著的数字距离效应;而无效线索提示条件下,ADHD儿童的大小数字距离效应均不明显,正常儿童仍然表现出显著的数字距离效应;（3）外源性有效线索提示条件下,ADHD儿童的小数字距离效应显著,但大数字距离效应不明显,正常儿童则表现出显著的大小数字距离效应;而无效线索提示条件下,只有正常儿童表现出显著的数字距离效应,ADHD儿童的数字距离效应不显著。

关键词: 内源性注意, 外源性注意, 数字加工, 数字距离效应, ADHD

Abstract: In the present study, Posner's endogenous and exogenous experimental paradigms were used to investigate ADHD and normal children's number distance effect of number processing. The stimuli were 1~9 Arabic numbers(not including 5). Subjects' task was to decide whether the presented number was larger or smaller than 5． The results showed that: 1)In the endogenous and exogenous attentions, ADHD children performed slowly than normal children on the behavioral performance. 2)In valid condition of endogenous attention, both ADHD and normal children showed significant number distance effect, but in invalid condition of endogenous attention, just normal children performed significant number distance effect, not ADHD children. 3)in valid condition of exogenous attention, ADHD children showed significant small number distance effect, and large number distance was disappeared; normal children showed significant both small and large number distance effect. But in invalid condition, only did normal children perform significant number distance effect, not ADHD children.

Key words: endogenous attention, exogenous attention, number processing, number distance effect, ADHD

中图分类号:

B842.3

潘运, 罗叶双, 王馨, 赵守盈,. 视觉选择性注意对注意缺损多动障碍儿童数字距离效应的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 41-48.

Pan Yun, Luo Yeshuang, Wang Xin, Zhao Shouying. Research on Endogenous and Exogenous Attention Affected ADHD Children' Number Distance Effect of Number Processing[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(1): 41-48.

参考文献

1 何侃.(2008). 多动症儿童学龄期心理问题的预防与干预. 现代预防医学, 35(24), 4818-4820.
2 刘超, 买晓琴, 傅小兰.(2005). 内源性注意与外源性注意条件对数字加工的不同影响. 心理学报, 37(2), 167-177.
3 潘运, 白学军, 沈德立, 赵守盈.(2012). 内源性注意和外源性注意对中小学生SNARC效应的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 561-568.
4 潘运, 白学军.(2013). 视觉空间注意定向对中小学生数字加工距离效应的影响. 心理与行为研究, 11(5), 582-588.
5 徐岩, 周晓林, 王玉凤.(2006). 两亚型注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）儿童的内隐注意定向. 心理学报, 38(5), 709-717.
6 American Psychiatric Association.(1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder 4th edition(DSM-IV). Washington D C: American Psychiatric Association.
7 Ansari, D., Lyons, I. M., van Eimeren, L., & Xu, F.(2007). Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1845-1853.
8 Barkely, R. A.(1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention and executive functions: constructing a unified theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65-94.
9 Berger, A., Henik, A., & Rafal, R.(2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 207-221.
10 Carter, C. S., Krener, P., Chaderjian, M., & Wolfe, V.(1995). Asymmetrical visual-spatial attentional performance in ADHD: Evidence for a right hemispheric defiit. Society of Biological Psychiatry, 37(11), 789-797.
11 Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C.(2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102(1), 101-117.
12 Dehaene, S.(1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently in compatible data. Perception & Psychophysics, 45(6), 557-566.
13 Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J.(1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626-641.
14 Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L.(2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3), 487-506.
15 Doallo, S., Lorenzo-López, L., Vizoso, C., Rodríguez Holguín, S., Amenedo, E., Bará, S., et al.(2004). The time course of the effects of central and peripheral cues on visual processing: An event-related potentials study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(1), 119-210.
16 Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J.(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 66(6), 555-556.
17 Gupta, R., & Kar, B. R.(2009). Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children. Progress in Brain Research, 176(3), 1-6.
18 Holloway, D. I., & Ansari, D.(2008). Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children′s development of number comparison. Developmental Science, 11(5), 644-649.
19 Jonides, J.(1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind′s eye′s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley(Eds.), Attention and performance(Vol. 9, pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20 Koechlin, E., Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J.(1997). Numerical transformation in five-month-old human infants. Mathematical Cognition, 3(2), 89-104.
21 Maloney, E. A., Risko, E. F., Preston, F., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J.(2010). Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: The case of the numerical distance effect. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 154-161.
22 McDonald, S., Bennett, K. M. B., Chambers, H., et al.(1999). Covert orienting and focusing of attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychologia, 37(3), 345-356.
23 Meere, J. V. D., Gunning, B., & Stemerdink, N.(1999). The effect of methylphenidate and clonidine on response inhibition and state regulation in children with ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 140(2), 291-298.
24 Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K.(1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519-1520.
25 Ortega, R., López, V., Carrasoc, X., et al.(2013). Exogenous orienting of visual-spatial attention in ADHD children. Brain Research, 1493(1), 68-79.
26 Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., & LeBihan, D.(2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1013-1026.
27 Posner, M. I.(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(2), 3-25.
28 Rubinsten, O., Henik, A., Berger, A., et al.(2002). The development of internal representation of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(1), 74-92.
29 Slaats-Willemse, D., Swaab-Barneveld, H., de Sonneville, L., et al.(2003). Deficient response inhibition as a cognitive endophenotype of ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(10), 1242-1248.
30 Spence. C, J., & Driver, J.(1994). Cover spatial orienting in audition exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 555-574.
31 Temple, E., & Ponser, M. I.(1998). Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-olds and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95(13), 7836-7841.
32 Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., et al.(2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336-1346.
33 Wood, C., Maruff, P., Levy, F., et al.(1999). Covert orienting of visual spatial attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Does comorbidity make a difference? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(2), 179-189.
34 Yantis, Y., & Jonides, J.(1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121-134.

[1]	谷莉, 李玉杰, 周广东. 父母教养方式与学龄期儿童注意缺陷/多动冲动症状：同伴拒绝的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 193-200.
[2]	张微. 注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）儿童的工作记忆：基础加工缺陷还是执行功能问题[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 438-445.
[3]	潘运,白学军. 视觉空间注意定向对中小学生数字加工距离效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 582-588.
[4]	张微. 两种符号检索条件下注意缺陷多动障碍和阅读障碍儿童的表现[J]. , 2013, 11(1): 78-83.
[5]	潘运；沈德立；王杰3. 不同注意提示线索条件下汉字数字加工的SNARC效应[J]. , 2009, 7(1): 21-26.