视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 8-14.

视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据

杨海波^1,2, 牛丽丽^1,2, 尹莎莎^1,2, 白学军^1,2

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074;
2. 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300074

收稿日期:2017-05-23 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-24
通讯作者: 杨海波
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划课题教育部重点项目“创伤后应激障碍中学生注意偏向的心理机制研究”（DBA150235）

Attention Capture was Guided by the Contents of Non-semantic Coding Visual Working Memory: Evidence from ERPs

YANG Haibo^1,2, NIU Lili^1,2, YIN Shasha^1,2, BAI Xuejun^1,2

1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300074, China;
2. Center for Cooperative Innovation in Mental Health Assessment and Promotion, Tianjin 300074, China

Received:2017-05-23 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的调节以及这种调节作用发生的阶段，本研究采用视觉搜索范式，以二维抽象对称图形为材料，被试为17名大学生，利用事件相关电位技术，研究不同视觉工作记忆内容影响注意捕获的电生理机制。结果发现：（1）无效信息条件（同侧，对侧）下的反应时显著长于中性条件；（2）同侧无效信息条件下的N2pc波幅显著增大，两侧无效信息条件下的P300波幅大于中性条件。结果表明，在注意加工的中期阶段，与视觉工作记忆中非语义编码项目特征相同的干扰刺激在视觉搜索过程中获得了注意资源竞争优势，干扰个体对靶刺激的注意捕获，且该效应持续至注意的晚期加工阶段。

关键词: 非语义编码, 视觉工作记忆, 注意捕获, N2pc, P300

Abstract: In order to explore the moderating effect of non-semantic coding information on attention capture in visual working memory and the stages of such moderating effect, the 2-D abstractly symmetric graphics were chose as materials and visual search paradigm was used. The ERPs of seventeen graduate participants were recorded to investigate the electrophysiological mechanism of the effects of different visual working memory contents on attention capture. The visual working memory contents were divided into three conditions:ipsilateral invalid information、contralateral invalid information and neutral information. The results demonstrated that:The RTs of the invalid information (ipsilateral, contralateral) conditions were significantly longer than neutral condition.The N2pc was enhanced under the condition of ipsilateral invalid information. The amplitude of the P300 was greater on ipsilateral invalid information and contralateral invalid information relative to neutral condition. The results suggested that the distractors with the same characteristics as non-semantic coding items in visual working memory gained the competitive advantage of attention resources and interfered with the attentional capture of target stimuli during the middle stage of attention processing of visual search. And this effect lasted to the late processing stage of attention.

Key words: non-semantic coding, visual working memory, attention capture, N2pc, P300

中图分类号:

B842

杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.

YANG Haibo, NIU Lili, YIN Shasha, BAI Xuejun. Attention Capture was Guided by the Contents of Non-semantic Coding Visual Working Memory: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.

参考文献

姚树霞, 杨东, 齐森青, 雷燕, Ding, C. (2012). 视觉空间注意研究中的N2pc成分述评. 心理科学进展, 20(3), 53-63
Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2017). No arousal-biased competition in focused visuospatial attention. Cognition, 168, 191-204
Berggren, N., & Eimer, M. (2018). Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1368-1382, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000541.
Brisson, B., Robitaille, N., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc. Neuroreport, 18(15), 1627-1630, doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f0b559.
Brouwer, A. M., Hogervorst, M. A., Oudejans, B., Ries, A. J., & Touryan, J. (2017). EEG and eye tracking signatures of target encoding during structured visual search. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 264, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264.
Chun,M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 39-78, doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222, doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205.
Desmedt, J. E. (1980). P300 in serial tasks: An essential post-decision closure mechanism. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 682-686, doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61690-8.
Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99(3), 225-234, doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9.
Gao, Z. F., Yu, S. X., Zhu, C. F., Shui, R. D., Weng, X. C., Li, P., & Shen, M. W. (2016). Object-based encoding in visual working memory: Evidence from memory-driven attentional capture. Scientific Reports, 6, 22822, doi: 10.1038/srep22822.
Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 936-949.
Kim, S., & Yang, S. C. (2016). Memory-based attentional capture by colour and shape contents in visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 24(1), 1-12, doi: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1213000.
Kumar, S., Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2), 307-317, doi: 10.1111/ejn.2009.30.issue-2.
Liu, Q., Lin, S. Y., Zhao, G., & Roberson, D. (2016). The effect of modulating top-down attention deployment on the N2pc/PCN. Biological Psychology, 117, 187-193, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.04.004.
Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000-1014, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.1000.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510-532, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510.
Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243-1265, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243.
Olson, I. R., Moore, K. S., & Drowos, D. B. (2008). The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1360-1369.
Proulx, M. J., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Biased competition and visual search: The role of luminance and size contrast. Psychological Research, 72(1), 106-113.
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248-261, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248.
Tan, J. F., Zhao, Y. F., Wu, S. S., Wang, L. J., Hitchman, G., & Tian, X., et al. (2014). The temporal dynamics of visual working memory guidance of selective attention. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(8), 345.
Telling, A. L., Kumar, S., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 2212-2225, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21348.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (1999). Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature, 400(6747), 867-869, doi: 10.1038/23698.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 121-138, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.121.

[1]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[2]	车晓玮, 王凯旋, 上官梦麒, 李寿欣. 视觉工作记忆中注意模板的表征—来自EROS的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 297-303.
[3]	刘丽, 李士一, 岳俊冰, 白学军. 位置-价值联结引发的注意捕获及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 289-295.
[4]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[5]	张嘉卉, 梁丽美, 刘强, 李永芬, 张忠炉, 贾江晓, 张文海, 李红. 自上而下任务定势影响基于关系的注意捕获[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 727-733.
[6]	安蓉, 孟繁莹. 与恐惧相关的简化刺激在不同知觉负载条件下的注意捕获效应*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 62-68.
[7]	赵偲,高雪梅,周群,翁蕾. 暴力电子游戏玩家对攻击性图片注意偏向的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 584-590.
[8]	齐铭铭，关丽丽，张庆林，杨娟. 心理性应激的时间加工进程:来自ERP的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 174-181.
[9]	钟毅平, 张宇驰, 田桑, 郭可, 李文和, 颜玉平, 周路平. 短期接触暴力电脑游戏导致暴力敏感:一项ERP的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 732-738.
[10]	王庭照,杨鹃. 不同工作记忆负荷下聋人与听力正常人注意捕获的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 601-606.
[11]	杨海波. 视觉工作记忆对自上而下注意控制的影响：发展视角的探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 312-317.
[12]	杨海波,尹莎莎,白学军. 视觉工作记忆内容对视觉搜索的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 150-154.
[13]	岳珍珠, 周晓林. 视觉工作记忆更新操作过程独立于刺激类型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(2): 125-129.
[14]	沈模卫,易宇骥,张峰. n-back任务下视觉工作记忆负荷研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1(3): 166-170.