真诚-虚伪品质对建议采纳的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过三个实验探究陌生关系中建议者真诚-虚伪品质对决策者建议采纳的影响机制。实验一将建议者真诚-虚伪品质设为组间变量，探讨其对建议采纳的影响；实验二在实验一的基础上加入认知信任的测量，探讨认知信任的中介作用；实验三加入建议者有无损失经历，形成2（真诚-虚伪品质）×2（有无损失经历）的组间设计，探究有无损失经历的调节作用。结果发现：（1）建议者的真诚品质可以促进建议采纳；（2）认知信任在建议者真诚-虚伪品质与建议采纳间起完全中介作用；（3）建议者有无损失经历在建议者真诚-虚伪品质和建议采纳间起调节作用。

关键词: 陌生关系, 真诚-虚伪品质, 认知信任, 有无损失经历, 建议采纳

Abstract: To explore the impact of authentic-hypocritical trait on advice taking and its mechanism in the stranger relationship, we conducted 3 experiments in total. In experiment 1, we set adviser's trait as between-subjects factor and explored their impact on the advice taking through five decision-making problems. In experiment 2, we also treated advisee's trait as a between-subjects factor and used the same decision-making procedure as Experiment 1, except that we measured cognition-based trust to find its mediating effect; In experiment 3, we added the new variable-Price/no Price into our study (2 Authentic/Hypocrisy×2 Price/No Price), so that we could find its moderating effect in advice taking.
Three effects were observed. First, when advisor owned authentic trait, his/her advice would be adopted more; on the contrary, when adviser owned hypocrisy trait, his/her advice would be adopted less. Second, under the influence of advisor's trait, cognition-based trust played a mediating role in advice taking. Third, when advisor payed for his/her decision, his/her advice would be adopted more, or his/her advice would be adopted less. That is to say, Price/No Price acted as the role of moderator.

Key words: stranger relationship, authentic-hypocritical trait, cognition-based trust, price/no price, advice taking

中图分类号:

B842.1

谢梦雅, 段锦云. 真诚-虚伪品质对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 134-140.

XIE Mengya, DUAN Jinyun. The Impact of Authentic and Hypocritical Personality on Advice Taking and its Mechanism[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(1): 134-140.

参考文献

孙露莹, 陈琳, 段锦云. (2017). 决策过程中的建议采纳: 策略、影响及未来展望. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 168-179
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274
Anna M. C., Sean T. H., Ross P. R., & George T. T. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on followers' ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: an experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 581-594.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
de Hooge, I. E., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Tzioti, S. C. (2013). Emotions in advice taking: The roles of agency and valence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 246-258.
Downey, J. L., & Christensen, L. (2006). Belief persistence in impression formation. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(3), 479-487.
Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2015). Do as I say, not as I've done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 131, 16-32.
Eggers, F., O'Dwyer, M., Kraus, S., Vallaster, C., & Güldenberg, S. (2013). The impact of brand authenticity on brand trust and SME growth: A CEO perspective. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 340-348.
Errazquin, L. A. (2013). Authentic leadership, trust and followers' emotions: The experience of HRMs during organizational change processes. Azkoaga: Cuadernos De Ciencias Sociales Y Económicas, 16, 123-148.
Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1165-1173.
Goldman, B. M., & Kernis, M. H. (2002). The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5(6), 18-20.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Hsieh, C. H., & Wang, D. S. (2015). Does supervisor-perceived authentic leadership influence employee work engagement through employee-perceived authentic leadership and employee trust? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), 2329-2348.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
Lapointe, É., Vandenberghe, C., & Boudrias, J. S. (2014). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment: The mediating role of role clarity and affect-based trust relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 599-624.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473-490.
Meshi, D., Biele, G., Korn, C. W., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012). How expert advice influences decision making. PLoS One, 7(11), e49748.
Peterson, S. J., Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Hannah, S. T. (2012). RETRACTED: The relationship between authentic leadership and follower job performance: The mediating role of follower positivity in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 502-516.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2014). Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 200-210.
Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
Schrah, G. E., Dalal, R. S., & Sniezek, J. A. (2006). No decision-maker is an island: Integrating expert advice with information acquisition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 43-60.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
Wang, L., Rau, P. L. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & Hinds, P. (2010). When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 359-366). Osaka, Japan: IEEE.
Wang, W. Q., Qiu, L. Y., Kim, D., & Benbasat, I. (2016). Effects of rational and social appeals of online recommendation agents on cognition- and affect-based trust. Decision Support Systems, 86, 48-60.
Webber, S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams. Small Group Research, 39(6), 746-769.
Weber, J. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2004). Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 75-101.
Wickham, R. E. (2013). Perceived authenticity in romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 878-887.

[1]	邓颜彦, 郭成. 合作与竞争关系中社会比较对高中生认知信任与情感信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 556-562.
[2]	段锦云, 徐悦, 任小云, 吴俏敏. 语境交流导向与建议方式对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 261-267.
[3]	王焕弟, 陈世平. 利益冲突对不同认知风格决策者建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 415-421.
[4]	闫婷婷，杜秀芳，李假. 情绪和认知方式对个体建议采纳的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 601-608.
[5]	康廷虎，庞倩，张丰. 职业决策情境中信任水平对建议采纳的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 371-376.