性别和情境危险程度对行人危险知觉的影响：来自ERP的证据

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用事件相关电位技术，探讨性别和情境危险程度对行人危险知觉的影响。实验采用三类真实交通情境图片作为材料，包括无危险情境图片、低度危险情境图片和高度危险情境图片。结果发现：低度危险情境条件下，女性的N1潜伏期更短；在N1波幅上，高度危险情境大于无危险情境或低度危险情境；在P3波幅上，男性大于女性，低度危险情境大于无危险情境或高度危险情境。说明早期视觉加工阶段，女性对低度危险情境更敏感；男性比女性给予交通情境更多的注意；情境危险程度能够调节危险知觉过程中的注意分配。

关键词: 行人, 危险知觉, 性别, 情境

Abstract: The effect of gender and situational hazardous level on pedestrian hazard perception was investigated using event-related potential (ERP) technique. Images of three types of real traffic situations were used as test materials, including non-hazard situation, low-hazard situation, and high-hazard situation. The results showed that the female N1 latency was shorter than male in the low-hazard situation; the N1 amplitude was larger in the high-hazard situation than in non-hazard or low-hazard situation; the male P3 amplitude was larger than female, and the P3 amplitude was larger in low-hazard situations than in non-hazard or high-hazard situation. The results indicates that females are more sensitive to the low-hazard situation at the early visual processing stage; the male have a processing advantage at the attention distribution stage; situational hazardous level can regulate attention allocation in the processing of hazard perception.

Key words: pedestrian, hazard perception, gender, situation

中图分类号:

B842.1

朱鹏, 常若松. 性别和情境危险程度对行人危险知觉的影响：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 113-120.

ZHU Peng, CHANG Ruosong. Effects of Gender and Situational Hazard Level on Pedestrian Hazard Perception: Evidence from ERP[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 113-120.

参考文献

Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(8), 1484-1504, doi: 10.1080/02724980543000204.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Campanella, S., Rossignol, M., Mejias, S., Joassin, F., Maurage, P., Debatisse, D., … Guérit, J. M. (2004). Human gender differences in an emotional visual oddball task: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 367(1), 14-18, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.097.
Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Trawley, S., Collins, L., van Loon, E., Andrews, B., & Underwood, G. (2012). Some hazards are more attractive than others: Drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 600-609.
Doallo, S., Lorenzo-López, L., Vizoso, C., Rodríguez Holguín, S., Amenedo, E., Barã, S., & Cadaveira, F. (2005). Modulations of the visual n1 component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(4), 807-820, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.013.
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the p300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 357-374, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00058027.
Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Emotion, 7(4), 691-696, doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.691.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845-857, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.
Hamed, M. M. (2001). Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings. Safety Science, 38(1), 63-82, doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00058-8.
Haworth, N. L., & Mulvihill, C. (2004). A comparison of hazard perception and responding in car drivers and motorcyclists. Hazard Perception, 9(4-5), 193-202.
Hill, R., Lewis, V., & Dunbar, G. (2000). Young children’s concepts of danger. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 103-119, doi: 10.1348/026151000165607.
Hofer, A., Siedentopf, C. M., Ischebeck, A., Rettenbacher, M. A., Verius, M., Felber, S., & Fleischhacker, W. W. (2006). Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during the perception of emotion: A functional MRI study. NeuroImage, 32(2), 854-862, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.053.
Kirouac, G., & Dore, F. Y. (1985). Accuracy of the judgment of facial expression of emotions as a function of sex and level of education. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9(1), 3-7, doi: 10.1007/BF00987555.
Kissler, J., & Herbert, C. (2013). Emotion, etmnooi, or emitoon? - faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading. Biological Psychology, 92(3), 464-479, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.004.
LeDoux, J. E. (2009). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2010). Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science, 13(1), 221-228, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00872.x.
Luck, S. J. (2009). 事件相关电位基础(范思陆译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
Ma, Q. G., Jin, J., & Wang, L. (2010). The neural process of hazard perception and evaluation for warning signal words: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 483(3), 206-210, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.009.
Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32(1), 4-18, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x.
Oades, R. D., Dittmann-Balcar, A., Schepker, R., Eggers, C., & Zerbin, D. (1996). Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or tourette/tic symptoms. Biological Psychology, 43(2), 163-185, doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(96)05189-7.
Orozco, S., & Ehlers, C. L. (1998). Gender differences in electrophysiological responses to facial stimuli. Biological Psychiatry, 44(4), 281-289, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00487-3.
Rosenbloom, T. (2006). Sensation seeking and pedestrian crossing compliance. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 34(2), 113-122, doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.113.
Rosenbloom, T., Mandel, R., Rosner, Y., & Eldror, E. (2015). Hazard perception test for pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 79, 160-169.
Rosenbloom, T., & Wolf, Y. (2002). Sensation seeking and detection of risky road signals: A developmental perspective. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34(5), 569-580.
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & Fincher, K. (2009). From oral to moral. Science, 323(5918), 1179-1180, doi: 10.1126/science.1170492.
Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150(3700), 1187-1188, doi: 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187.
Thompson, L. L., Rivara, F. P., Ayyagari, R. C., & Ebel, B. E. (2013). Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: An observational study. Injury Prevention, 19(4), 232-237, doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040601.
van Le, Q., Isbell, L. A., Matsumoto, J., Nguyen, M., Hori, E., Maior, R. S., … Nishijo, H. (2013). Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(47), 19000-19005, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312648110.
Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 190-203.
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 624-631, doi: 10.1038/nn1057.
Walker, E. J., Lanthier, S. N., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2012). The effects of personal music devices on pedestrian behaviour. Safety Science, 50(1), 123-128, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.011.
Wrase, J., Klein, S., Gruesser, S. M., Hermann, D., Flor, H., Mann, K., … Heinz, K. (2003). Gender differences in the processing of standardized emotional visual stimuli in humans: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 348(1), 41-45, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00565-2.

[1]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[2]	张硕, 蔡雪斌, 邓旭阳, 赵馨. 青少年家庭功能与心理复原力的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 204-211.
[3]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[4]	朱娜平, 王文平, 李丽琼, 刘雁伶. 数量让位价值：5～10岁儿童公平分配发展的“此消彼长”[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 233-239.
[5]	李启明, 王纪婷. 家庭氛围、子女生活满意度与心理健康代际传递的关系：亲子性别和子女年龄的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 282-288.
[6]	周广方, 魏子晗, 欧阳良媛, Ngure Mary Muthoni, 王晓庄. 描述信息与经验不一致对个体风险选择的影响：决策模型的拟合[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 29-36.
[7]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[8]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[9]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[10]	赵悦彤, 孙晓娟, 白倩, 张向葵. 空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.
[11]	刘啸莳. 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系：母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 59-65.
[12]	魏淑华, 赵健, 董及美, 陈功香. 工作对家庭的增益与中小学教师的工作满意度：职业认同的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 125-130,136.
[13]	康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 1-7.
[14]	岳鹏飞, 史梦梦, 刘旭, 白学军. 词汇的唤醒度对情绪标注效应的影响—ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 31-38.
[15]	张奇勇, 卢家楣. 学生的首因效应对教师情绪感染力的影响：情绪真实性判断的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 60-66.