同步性联合运动中对他人的运动预测：反馈线索的关键作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 743-749.

同步性联合运动中对他人的运动预测：反馈线索的关键作用

陈怡馨^1,2, 张琪涵^1,2,3, 夏依旦^1,2, 赵冰洁^1,2, 白学军^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2021-06-10 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-11-20
通讯作者: 白学军，E-mail：baixuejun@tjnu.edu.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（18JJD190001）；国家自然科学基金（32100878）；天津师范大学校博士基金（52WW2104）

Motor Prediction of Others in Synchronized Joint Action: The Critical Role of Feedback Cue

CHEN Yixin^1,2, ZHANG Qihan^1,2,3, XIA Yidan^1,2, ZHAO Bingjie^1,2, BAI Xuejun^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received:2021-06-10 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在探讨任务线索和反馈线索在同步性联合运动中对他人运动预测的影响及亚稳态自我-他人整合模型中反馈线索在同步性联合运动中的关键作用，基于联合触点任务，采用3（线索：无线索、任务线索、反馈线索）×4（距离差：Δ0、Δ1、Δ2、Δ3）的被试内设计。结果发现：（1）任务线索下个体的反应时间受他人运动距离的调节，但不受其自身运动距离的物理影响。反馈线索与无线索下则表现出相反的趋势；（2）相比于无线索与任务线索，反馈线索下个体间的绝对异步性最小。表明反馈线索下通过感知预测他人动作的加工方式在同步性联合运动中起关键作用。

关键词: 同步性联合运动, 他人运动预测, 反馈线索, 任务线索

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of task cue and feedback cue on the motor prediction of others in synchronized joint action and the key role of feedback cue in the metastable model of self-other integration. By using a joint reaching task and a 3 (cue: no cue, task cue, feedback cue) × 4 (distance differences: Δ0, Δ1, Δ2, Δ3) within-subjects design, the current study showed that: 1) Under the task cue condition, the response time of individuals was regulated by the motor distance of others rather than the motor distance of themselves. Under the no cue condition and feedback cue condition, this pattern showed an opposite effect. 2) Compared with the no cue and task cue condition, the mean absolute asynchrony was the lowest with feedback cue. This indicates that the feedback cue predicts the movement of others in a perceptual way, which plays a critical role in synchronized joint action.

Key words: synchronized joint action, motor prediction of others, feedback cue, task cue

中图分类号:

B842

陈怡馨, 张琪涵, 夏依旦, 赵冰洁, 白学军. 同步性联合运动中对他人的运动预测：反馈线索的关键作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 743-749.

CHEN Yixin, ZHANG Qihan, XIA Yidan, ZHAO Bingjie, BAI Xuejun. Motor Prediction of Others in Synchronized Joint Action: The Critical Role of Feedback Cue[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 743-749.

参考文献

Balser, N., Lorey, B., Pilgramm, S., Stark, R., Bischoff, M., Zentgraf, K., … Munzert, J. (2014). Prediction of human actions: Expertise and task-related effects on neural activation of the action observation network. Human Brain Mapping, 35(8), 4016–4034, doi: 10.1002/hbm.22455.
Chen, Y. X., Zhang, Q. H., Yuan, S., Zhao, B. J., Zhang, P., & Bai, X. J. (2020). The influence of prior intention on joint action: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(12), 1351–1360.
Heggli, O. A., Cabral, J., Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2019). A Kuramoto model of self-other integration across interpersonal synchronization strategies. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(10), e1007422, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007422.
Heggli, O. A., Konvalinka, I., Cabral, J., Brattico, E., Kringelbach, M. L., & Vuust, P. (2021). Transient brain networks underlying interpersonal strategies during synchronized action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 19–30, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa056.
Heggli, O. A., Konvalinka, I., Kringelbach, M. L., & Vuust, P. (2021). A metastable attractor model of self-other integration (MEAMSO) in rhythmic synchronization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1835), 20200332, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0332.
Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021). Interactional synchrony: Signals, mechanisms and benefits. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1–2), 5–18, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa024.
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960, doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0394.
Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 59–101.
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2220–2230, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.497843.
Ptak, R., Schnider, A., & Fellrath, J. (2017). The dorsal frontoparietal network: A core system for emulated action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 589–599, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.002.
Ragert, M., Schroeder, T., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Knowing too little or too much: The effects of familiarity with a co-performer’s part on interpersonal coordination in musical ensembles. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 368.
Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2008). Sensorimotor synchronization with adaptively timed sequences. Human Movement Science, 27(3), 423–456, doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.016.
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(3), 403–452, doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2.
Schmitz, L., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2017). Co-representation of others’ task constraints in joint action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1480–1493, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000403.
Schmitz, L., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2018). Co-actors represent the order of each other’s actions. Cognition, 181, 65–79, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.008.
Schultz, B. G., & Palmer, C. (2019). The roles of musical expertise and sensory feedback in beat keeping and joint action. Psychological Research, 83(3), 419–431, doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01156-8.
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367, doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.
Varlet, M., Nozaradan, S., Nijhuis, P., & Keller, P. E. (2020). Neural tracking and integration of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in improvised interpersonal coordination. NeuroImage, 206, 116303, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116303.
Vesper, C., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Our actions in my mind: Motor imagery of joint action. Neuropsychologia, 55, 115–121, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.024.
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48–61, doi: 10.1037/a0028066.