具身情绪对抑郁倾向个体创造性思维的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究以抑郁倾向个体为研究对象，探究具身情绪对其创造性思维的影响。实验1和实验2分别采用面部表情操纵和身体姿势操纵技术诱发被试的具身积极或消极情绪，以探究具身情绪对抑郁倾向个体创造性思维的影响。研究发现：(1)面部表情操纵诱发的具身积极情绪能够提升抑郁倾向个体的内隐积极情绪，且有利于抑郁倾向个体创造性思维独特性维度的表现；(2)扩张姿势操纵诱发的具身积极情绪能够提升抑郁倾向个体的内隐积极情绪并降低其外显消极情绪，且有利于抑郁倾向个体的创造性思维独特性维度和灵活性维度的表现；而蜷缩姿势操纵诱发的具身消极情绪降低了抑郁倾向个体的内隐积极情绪和外显积极情绪。

关键词: 抑郁倾向, 具身情绪, 面部表情, 身体姿势, 创造性思维

Abstract:

The study explored the influence of embodied emotion on creative thinking of individuals with depression tendency. Two experiments were conducted by using the facial expression manipulation paradigm and body posture manipulation paradigm separately to manipulate the participants’ embodied emotions. In Experiment 1, the results showed that embodied positive emotions that induced by facial expression manipulation enhanced the implicit positive emotions and improved the performance on the uniqueness dimension of creative thinking for depressive-tendency individuals. In Experiment 2, the results showed that the embodied positive emotions that induced by expansion posture enhanced the implicit positive emotions but reduced the explicit negative emotions for depressive-tendency individuals. The embodied positive emotions were also beneficial to depressive-tendency individuals’ performance on the uniqueness and flexibility dimensions of creative thinking, whereas the embodied negative emotion that induced by crouching posture reduced their implicit positive emotion and explicit positive emotion.

Key words: depression tendency, embodied emotion, facial expression, body posture, creative thinking

陈建新, 方紫梦, 黄蓉, 叶宝仪, 杨伟平, 魏柳青. 具身情绪对抑郁倾向个体创造性思维的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 602-608.

Jianxin CHEN, Zimeng FANG, Rong HUANG, Baoyi YE, Weiping YANG, Liuqing WEI. The Influence of Embodied Emotion on Creative Thinking of Individuals with Depressive Tendency[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 602-608.

图/表 6

参考文献 0

	陈建新, 伍莉, 黄蓉, 王喆, 陈悦, 杨伟平. 情绪的相容性对创造性思维的影响. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18 (4): 433- 439.
	胡卫平, 王博韬, 段海军, 程丽芳, 周寰, 李晶晶. 情绪影响创造性认知过程的神经机制. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23 (11): 1869- 1878.
	汪海彬, 侯紫昳, 朱蕾晔, 程思, 姚本先. 内隐积极消极情感量表测评大学生样本的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2018, 32 (10): 869- 872. DOI
	王艳梅, 郭德俊. 积极情绪对任务转换的影响. 心理学报, 2008, 40 (3): 301- 306.
	吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林. 顿悟脑机制的实验范式探索. 心理科学, 2009, 32 (1): 122- 125.
	杨文静, 靳玉乐, 陈群林, 孙江洲, 童丹丹, 李亚丹, … 张庆林. 科学发明中原型启发的创造性思维成分及其脑机制. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (8): 1139- 1146.
	姚海娟, 王金霞, 苏清丽, 白学军. 具身情绪与创造性思维: 情境性调节定向的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16 (4): 441- 448. DOI
	叶浩生. 具身心智与具身的教育. 教育研究, 2023, 44 (3): 32- 41. DOI
	叶浩生, 苏佳佳, 苏得权. 身体的意义: 生成论视域下的情绪理论. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (12): 1393- 1404.
	张鹏程, 丁梦夏, 王灿明. 积极情绪体验对创造力影响. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15 (5): 613- 618. DOI
	张亚. (2014). 表情操控对普通人群及轻度抑郁者情绪体验的影响(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
	Andolfi, V. R., Di Nuzzo, C., & Antonietti, A. Opening the mind through the body: The effects of posture on creative processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2017, 24, 20- 28. DOI
	Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus. Psychological Bulletin, 2008, 134 (6): 779- 806. DOI
	Cuijpers, P., Quero, S., Papola, D., Cristea, I. A., & Karyotaki, E. Care-as-usual control groups across different settings in randomized trials on psychotherapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 2021, 51 (4): 634- 644. DOI
	Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Díaz, M. D. M. Affective induction and creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 2013, 25 (2): 213- 221. DOI
	Guilford, J. P. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53 (4): 267- 293. DOI
	Guilford, J. P. Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1967, 1 (1): 3- 14. DOI
	Gupta, R. K. Major depression: An illness with objective physical signs. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 2009, 10 (3): 196- 201. DOI
	Jamison, K. R. Manic-depressive illness and creativity. Scientific American, 1995, 272 (2): 62- 67. DOI
	Leung, A. K. Y., Kim, S., Polman, E., Ong, L. S., Qiu, L., Goncalo, J. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J. Embodied metaphors and creative “acts”. Psychological Science, 2012, 23 (5): 502- 509. DOI
	Malinin, L. H. How radical is embodied creativity? Implications of 4E approaches for creativity research and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10, 2372. DOI
	Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2022). Do open or closed postures boost creative performance? The effects of postural feedback on divergent and convergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(3), 504–518.
	Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. Can sitting postures influence the creative mind? Positive effect of contractive posture on convergent-integrative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 2024, 36 (1): 58- 69. DOI
	Miller, N., Perich, T., & Meade, T. Depression, mania and self-reported creativity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 2019, 276, 129- 133. DOI
	Parker, G. Defining melancholia: The primacy of psychomotor disturbance. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2007, 115 (S433): 21- 30. DOI
	Srivastava, S., & Ketter, T. A. The link between bipolar disorders and creativity: Evidence from personality and temperament studies. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2010, 12 (6): 522- 530. DOI
	Stanciu, M. M. Embodied creativity: A critical analysis of an underdeveloped subject. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 187, 312- 317. DOI
	Wang, X. Y., He, Y. Y., Lu, K. L., Deng, C. L., Qiao, X. N., & Hao, N. How does the embodied metaphor affect creative thinking. NeuroImage, 2019, 202, 116114. DOI
	Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (6): 1063- 1070. DOI
	Wilkes, C., Kydd, R., Sagar, M., & Broadbent, E. Upright posture improves affect and fatigue in people with depressive symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2017, 54, 143- 149. DOI
	Wu, L., Huang, R., Wang, Z., Selvaraj, J. N., Wei, L. Q., Yang, W. P., & Chen, J. X. Embodied emotion regulation: The influence of implicit emotional compatibility on creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 1822. DOI
	Zabetipour, M., Pishghadam, R., & Ghonsooly, B. The impacts of open/closed body positions and postures on learners’ moods. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, 6 (2): 643- 655.

维度	面部表情操纵
维度	对照组	抑制微笑组	微笑组
顿悟	3.65±1.30	3.60±1.08	3.88±1.37
流畅性	6.31±2.52	6.12±2.11	7.64±3.56
灵活性	3.84±1.08	3.80±0.78	4.46±1.95
独特性	0.87±0.78	0.69±0.50	1.47±1.39

维度	面部表情操纵
维度	对照组	抑制微笑组	微笑组
顿悟	3.65±1.30	3.60±1.08	3.88±1.37
流畅性	6.31±2.52	6.12±2.11	7.64±3.56
灵活性	3.84±1.08	3.80±0.78	4.46±1.95
独特性	0.87±0.78	0.69±0.50	1.47±1.39

因变量	面部表情操纵	测量时间
因变量	面部表情操纵	T1	T2
IPA得分	对照组	46.87±11.60	47.59±10.63
	抑制微笑组	48.35±10.34	46.04±11.43
	微笑组	45.89±9.54	49.50±9.91
INA得分	对照组	38.86±11.02	41.49±12.24
	抑制微笑组	38.47±13.45	41.24±11.28
	微笑组	40.06±10.13	39.37±11.13

因变量	面部表情操纵	测量时间
因变量	面部表情操纵	T1	T2
IPA得分	对照组	46.87±11.60	47.59±10.63
	抑制微笑组	48.35±10.34	46.04±11.43
	微笑组	45.89±9.54	49.50±9.91
INA得分	对照组	38.86±11.02	41.49±12.24
	抑制微笑组	38.47±13.45	41.24±11.28
	微笑组	40.06±10.13	39.37±11.13

因变量	面部表情操纵	测量时间
因变量	面部表情操纵	T1	T2
PA得分	对照组	26.74±8.00	26.13±8.10
	抑制微笑组	26.52±6.87	25.84±8.28
	微笑组	26.89±5.95	24.03±6.70
NA得分	对照组	15.30±6.35	15.78±6.50
	抑制微笑组	16.95±5.77	17.72±7.68
	微笑组	17.45±5.54	17.57±6.06