多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）中文版的修订报告

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 49-53.

多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）中文版的修订报告

焦璨^{1, 2}, 张敏强², 吴利², 纪薇²

1 深圳大学心理学系,深圳 518000;
2 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631

收稿日期:2009-06-11 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 张敏强,男,华南师范大学心理应用研究中心教授,博士生导师。Email: zhangmq1117@yahoo.com.cn。
作者简介:焦璨,女,深圳大学心理学系讲师,博士。
基金资助:
本研究得到广东省自然科学基金9151063101000002项目,教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2009JJDXLX006项目的资助

THE REVISED SHORT VERSION OF MULTI-MOTIVE GRID IN MAINLAND CHINA

Jiao Can^1,2, Zhang Minqiang², Wu Li², Ji Wei²

1 Department of Psychology,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen518000;
2 Center for Studies of Psychological Application,South China Normal University,Guangzhou510631

Received:2009-06-11 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对Sokolowski等人编制的简版多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）作了中文版的修订。MMG-S的验证性因素分析表明：中文修订版MMG-S仍保持英文版的六因子结构,修订后六因子的α系数在0.70~0.84之间。中文修订版MMG-S具有良好的心理学测量指标,可用于测量企业管理人员的三种社会性动机。

关键词: 多元动机网格测验, 成就动机, 交往动机, 权力动机

Abstract: The present study was designed to revise the short version of Multi-Motive Grid developed by Sokolowski, Schmalt, Langens, and Puca. The findings of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that both the original and revised short version of Multi-Motive Grid had the same six dimensions, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the six dimensions of the revised revision were between 0.70 and 0.84. The results suggested that the revised measures had sound psychometrical criterion, and the revised revision was available for assessing the three social motives of management staff at the same time.

Key words: Multi-Motive Grid, achievement motives, affiliation motives, power motives

中图分类号:

B841.7

焦璨, 张敏强, 吴利, 纪薇. 多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）中文版的修订报告[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 49-53.

Jiao Can,Zhang Minqiang,Wu Li,Ji Wei. THE REVISED SHORT VERSION OF MULTI-MOTIVE GRID IN MAINLAND CHINA[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(1): 49-53.

参考文献

1 Murray, H A. Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938
2 彭聃龄. 普通心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2001
3 McClelland D C, Koestner R, Weinberger J. How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 1989, 96: 690-702
4 Greenwald A G, McGhee D E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6): 1464-1480
5 Brunstein J C, Schmitt C H. Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 2004, 38(6): 536-555
6 Schmidt-Atzert L. Manual of “Objective Achievement Motivation Test (Release 21. 00)”, 2004
7 Wagner-Menghin M M. Content validity of an objective personality test for the assessment of achievement motive. Psychology Science, 2004, 46(2): 259-280
8 Sokolowski K, Schmalt H D, Langens T A, et al. Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: The multi-motive grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 2000, 74(1): 126-145
9 Schmalt, H D. Die Messung des Leistungsmotivs [The measurement of the achievement motive]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 1976
10 Schmalt, H D. Power motivation and the perception of control//Halisch F, Kuhl J. Motivation, Intention, and Volition. Berlin: Springer, 1987
11 Sokolowski, K. Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Messung des Anschlußmotivs[The development of a measure for the motive to affiliate]. Diagnostica, 1992, 38: 1-17
12Kehr H M. Implicit/Explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004, 30(3): 315-327
13张锦坤, 白学军. “半投射”和“客观性”: 动机测验的两种新形式. 心理学探新, 2006, 26(4): 83-87
14杜建政, 李明. 内隐动机测量的新方法. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(3): 458-463
15杨丽萍. 合群动机及其与幸福感的关系. 社会心理研究, 1997, (4): 18-25

[1]	高峰, 白学军. 越努力越幸福—中国背景下成就动机与主观幸福感的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 466-472.
[2]	李瑛, 崔树军. 高中生内隐、外显成就动机与学业拖延的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 359-365.
[3]	李亚强,陈朝阳,苏永强,杨琳琳,杨勇. 权力对观点采择的影响：权力动机的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 399-405.
[4]	王建峰,皇甫桦彦. 基于自我决定视角的动机结构与主观幸福感的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 234-240.