靶线索与意向关联性对事件性前瞻记忆的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 70-75.

靶线索与意向关联性对事件性前瞻记忆的影响

陈思佚^{1, 2}, 张庆男¹, 周仁来^{1, 2, 3}

1 认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室（北京师范大学）,北京 100875;
2 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室（北京师范大学）,北京 100875;
3 儿童发展和学习科学教育部重点实验室（东南大学）,南京 200096

收稿日期:2009-06-02 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 周仁来,男,北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室教授。Email :rlzhou@bnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:陈思佚,女,北京师范大学心理学院学生。
基金资助:
本研究得到长江学者和创新团队发展计划IRT0710项目和国家基础科学人才培养基金J0630759项目的资助

THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEGREE OF RELATEDNESS BETWEEN THE TARGET CUE AND INTENTION ON PROSPECTIVE MEMORY

Chen Siyi^1,2,Zhang Qingnan¹,Zhou Renlai^1,2,3

1 State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning(Beijing Normal University), Beijing 100875;
2 Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology(Beijing Normal University), Beijing 100875;
3 Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science(Southeast University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096

Received:2009-06-02 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用基于双重任务的研究范式,操纵线索与意向的关联性、分心水平以及线索区别性,考察了前瞻记忆的前瞻成分和回溯成分在基于事件的前瞻记忆中的作用。结果表明：（1）靶线索与意向关联性对前瞻记忆的回溯成分有显著影响,靶线索与意向高关联时,意向提取过程符合自动加工;靶线索与意向低关联时,意向提取过程符合策略加工。（2）靶线索的区别性对前瞻记忆的前瞻成分有显著影响,靶线索区别性特征显著提高对线索的识别水平,符合自动加工,当靶线索特征不显著时需要策略加工。

关键词: 前瞻记忆, 关联性, 区别性, 前瞻成分, 回溯成分

Abstract: In this study, two experiments manipulated the degree of relation between the target cue and intention, the distractive level of divided attention and the distinctiveness of the taget cue, the function of prospective component and retrospective component in the event-based prospective memory were discussed using the dual-task experimental paradigm. The results showed that:(1)The degree of relation has the greatest effect on the retrospective component of prospective memory. When the relatedness was high, the extraction process of intention consists with automatic process. But when the relatedness was low, the extraction process of intention needs strategic process;(2)Cue-distinctiveness has the greatest effect on the prospective component of prospective memory, and does greatly prompt cue recognition. The recognition of the target cue consists with the automatic process, and when the target cue was not distinctive, the recognition of the target cue needs strategic process.

Key words: event-based prospective memory, relatedness, distinctiveness, prospective component, retrospective component

中图分类号:

B842.3

陈思佚, 张庆男, 周仁来. 靶线索与意向关联性对事件性前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 70-75.

Chen Siyi,Zhang Qingnan,Zhou Renlai. THE INFLUENCE OF THE DEGREE OF RELATEDNESS BETWEEN THE TARGET CUE AND INTENTION ON PROSPECTIVE MEMORY[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(1): 70-75.

参考文献

1 Guajardo N R, Best D L. Do preschoolers remember what to do? Incentive and external cues in prospective memory. Cognitive Development, 2000, 15(1): 75-97
2 Einstein G O, Holland L J, McDaniel M A, et al. Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 1992, 7(3): 471-478
3 Moscovitch M. Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models//Schacter D L, Tulving E. Memory Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1994. 269-310
4 Cherry K E, Martin R C. Prospective remembering in younger and older adults: Role of the prospective cue. Memory, 2001, 9(3): 177-193
5 NowinskiJ L, DismukesR K. Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing. Memory, 2005, 13(6): 649-657
6 Shallice T, Burgess P. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 1991, 114(2): 727-741
7 Smith R E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2003, 29(3): 347-361
8 Smith R E, Bayen U J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 2004, 30(4): 756-777
9 Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings//Brandimonte M, Einstein G O, McDaniel M A. Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996. 115-142
10 Einstein G O, McDaniel M.A. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1990, 16(4): 717-726
11 McDaniel M A, Einstein G O. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 14(7): 127-144
12Cohen A L, West R, Craik F I, et al. Modulation of the prospective and retrospective components of memory for intentions in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2001, 8(1): 1-13
13West R, Craik F I. Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 1999, 14(2): 264-272
14Smith R E, Bayen U J. The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology, 2005, 52(4): 243-256
15Marsh R L, Hicks J L. Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998, 24(2): 336-349
16孙瑶, 周仁来. 任务难度对前瞻记忆TAP效应影响的研究. 心理科学, 2009, 32(3): 528-530
17Hicks J L, Marsh R L, Cook G, et al. Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions, Journal of Memory and Language, 2005, 53(3): 430-444

[1]	金丽, 吴凤娟, 冷英. 语义关联性对重复知盲效应的影响：来自汉语成语的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 457-463.
[2]	江黛苔, 段亚杰, 严帅, 付思文, 刘伟. 事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 312-318.
[3]	刘红, 褚铮, 李缓缓, 赵笑梅. 自我损耗对基于时间前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 446-451,459.
[4]	干加裙, 张曼曼, 胡锦慧, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.
[5]	胡炜宇, 齐冰. 提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.
[6]	干加裙, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 张哲, 陈幼贞. 执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 743-749.
[7]	郭丰波, 韦义平, 高宇, 王益文,. 背景任务对前瞻记忆策略加工的影响：一项ERPs研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 75-82.
[8]	李芳, 张海燕, 田锐, 丁亮. 前瞻记忆的情绪一致性反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 198-204.
[9]	郭秀艳唐菁华李荆广. 汉字错误记忆的形、音编码差异研究[J]. , 2007, 5(2): 86-92.