发展与教育心理学

社会创造性的微观变化:基于虚拟仿真技术的研究

  • 薛雨康 ,
  • 田梦源 ,
  • 李芊芊 ,
  • 郭雅绮 ,
  • 马晓晴 ,
  • 谷传华
展开
  • 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,武汉 430079;
    2. 美国纽约州立大学奥尔巴尼分校教育学院,奥尔巴尼 12222

收稿日期: 2021-03-24

  网络出版日期: 2022-01-20

基金资助

全国教育科学规划“十三五”国家一般项目(BBA180080);中央高校基本科研业务费探索创新项目(CCNU19TS076)

The Microgenetic Change of Social Creativity: A Study Based on Virtual Simulation Technique

  • XUE Yukang ,
  • TIAN Mengyuan ,
  • LI Qianqian ,
  • GUO Yaqi ,
  • MA Xiaoqing ,
  • GU Chuanhua
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Educational, New York State University at Albany, Albany 12222, United States

Received date: 2021-03-24

  Online published: 2022-01-20

摘要

本研究将微观发生法设计和虚拟仿真技术相结合,考察了不同特质社会创造性大学生跨情境、跨时间的状态社会创造性的变化特点。结果表明:(1)在四种具体社会问题情境中,个体策略新颖性的变化表现出了跨情境的多样性特点,而策略实用性的变化则主要表现出了跨情境的一致性特点;(2)个体特质社会创造性对其状态社会创造性的表现的影响主要体现在策略的实用性上。

本文引用格式

薛雨康 , 田梦源 , 李芊芊 , 郭雅绮 , 马晓晴 , 谷传华 . 社会创造性的微观变化:基于虚拟仿真技术的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(1) : 65 -72 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.010

Abstract

By combining microgenetic design and virtual simulation technique, the present study examined high- and low- trait social creativity college students’ microgenetic change of state-society creativity across different social situations and different time points. The results showed that: 1) the changes of strategy originality were inconsistent across the situations, while the changes of strategy appropriateness were consistent across the majority of situations; 2) the effects of trait social creativity on state social creativity were mainly reflected in strategy appropriateness.

参考文献

谷传华, 刘艳, 周宗奎. (2010). 小学儿童社会创造性的内部一致性及其领域特征. 心理科学, 33(3), 616–620
谷传华, 王亚丽, 吴财付, 谢祥龙, 崔承珠, 王亚娴, .. 周宗奎. (2015). 社会创造性的脑机制: 状态与特质的EEG α波活动特点. 心理学报, 47(6), 765–773
谷传华, 张冬静, Hsueh, Y., Hu, X. G. (2014). 儿童特质社会创造性的跨文化研究: 基于中美文化的比较. 中国特殊教育, (4), 71–76, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2014.04.013
谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 郝恩河, 王亚丽. (2013). 状态与特质之分: 来自社会创造性的证据. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 483–490
蒋小花, 沈卓之, 张楠楠, 廖洪秀, 徐海燕. (2010). 问卷的信度和效度分析. 现代预防医学, 37(3), 429–431
辛自强, 林崇德. (2002). 微观发生法: 聚焦认知变化. 心理科学进展, 10(2), 206–212
Chang, E., Kim, H. T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658–1682.
Gu, C. H., Hu, B. Y., Ngwira, F. F., Jing, Z., & Zhou, Z. K. (2016). The effect of general creative personality and freedom of task choice on adolescents’ social creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 132–149, doi: 10.1002/jocb.74.
Holleman, G. A., Hooge, I. T. C., Kemner, C., & Hessels, R. S. (2020). The ‘real-world approach’ and its problems: A critique of the term ecological validity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 721.
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.
Lan, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). American and Chinese similarities and differences in defining and valuing creative products. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 285–306, doi: 10.1002/jocb.19.
Parsons, T. D. (2015). Virtual reality for enhanced ecological validity and experimental control in the clinical, affective and social neurosciences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 660.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, M. Y., Cross, L. K., Buboltz, C., & Nimps, T. (2009). Creativity and domain specificity: The effect of task type on multiple indexes of creative problem-solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 73–80.
Saredakis, D., Szpak, A., Birckhead, B., Keage, H. A. D., Rizzo, A., & Loetscher, T. (2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 96.
Shao, Y., Zhang, C. C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1219, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219.
Theurer, C., Rogh, W., & Berner, N. (2021). Interdependencies between openness and creativity of fifth graders. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(3), 391–400.
van Hooijdonk, M., Mainhard, T., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2020). Creative problem solving in primary education: Exploring the role of fact finding, problem finding, and solution finding across tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100665.
Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jäncke, L.,... Jänke, P. (2004). MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short documentation and instructions for application. Unpublished project report. Presence: MEC (IST–2001–37661).
Yaremych, H. E., & Persky, S. (2019). Tracing physical behavior in virtual reality: A narrative review of applications to social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103845.
Zhang, M., Wang, F., & Zhang, D. (2020). Individual differences in trait creativity moderate the state-level mood-creativity relationship. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0236987, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236987.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发