发展与教育心理学

初中生家庭社会经济地位、积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用

  • 盖笑松 ,
  • 吴晓靓 ,
  • 顾婷玉 ,
  • 张婵 ,
  • 马媛春
展开
  • 1. 东北师范大学心理学院,长春 130024;
    2. 吉林警察学院警察心理健康研究中心,长春 130117

收稿日期: 2020-03-07

  网络出版日期: 2022-05-20

基金资助

教育部人文社科规划基金项目(17YJA190003)

The Predictive Role of Socioeconomic Status and Positive Qualities on Middle School Students’ Achievement of the High School Entrance Examination

  • GAI Xiaosong ,
  • WU Xiaojing ,
  • GU Tingyu ,
  • ZHANG Chan ,
  • MA Yuanchun
Expand
  • 1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
    2. Police Mental Health Research Center, Jilin Police College, Changchun 130117

Received date: 2020-03-07

  Online published: 2022-05-20

摘要

以442名初中生为被试,采用历时20个月的纵向研究考察家庭社会经济地位(socioeconomic status, SES)和积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用。结果发现:(1)家庭SES、积极品质整体发展水平可以同时显著正向预测初中生在20个月后的中考成绩;(2)积极品质整体发展水平在家庭SES与中考成绩之间存在中介作用,即家庭SES越高,初中生的积极品质整体水平越高,其中考成绩越好。研究结果提示积极品质可以补偿低家庭SES对学生中考成绩的不良影响。

本文引用格式

盖笑松 , 吴晓靓 , 顾婷玉 , 张婵 , 马媛春 . 初中生家庭社会经济地位、积极品质对中考成绩的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(3) : 368 -374 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.012

Abstract

This 20-month longitudinal follow-up study examined the relationship between family socioeconomic status and the achievement of the high school entrance examination, and the compensating and mediating role of the overall level of positive quality. Four hundred and forty-two junior middle school students were investigated. The results showed that: 1) family SES and the overall level of positive quality positively predicted the achievement of the high school entrance examination; 2) family SES predicted the achievement of the high school entrance examination through the overall level of positive quality. Positive qualities could compensate for the negative effect of low family SES on academic achievement, and character education had the function of “education poverty alleviation”.

参考文献

常淑敏, 荆建蕾, 郭玲静, 孙晓颖. (2017). 发展资源与主观幸福感: 核心自我评价的中介作用及性别差异. 心理学探新, 37(6), 555–560
常淑敏, 宋育珊, 魏亦峰. (2017). 外部发展资源与青少年早期幸福感的关系: 内部发展资源和意向性自我调节的多重中介作用.中国特殊教育, (5), 49–55.
常淑敏, 张文新. (2013). 人类积极发展的资源模型——积极青少年发展研究的一个重要取向和领域. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 86–95
陈浩彬, 刘洁. (2018). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年智慧的关系: 积极教养方式和开放性人格的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 558–566
段文杰, 张永红, 李婷婷, 唐小晴, 段天宇. (2012). 父母养育方式、性格优势对心理和谐的影响. 心理学探新, 32(2), 183–187
盖笑松. (2020). 积极心理学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
盖笑松, 兰公瑞. (2013). 大学生积极发展问卷的编制. 心理与行为研究, 11(6), 786–791
盖笑松, 闫津廷, 谢燕萍, 邓梦蕙, 徐楠楠, 刘晓东. (2013). 高质量课外活动的特征分析. 现代教育科学, (2), 145–147, 136
高永金, 张瑜, 傅纳. (2017). 初中生积极心理品质发展现状调查. 中国特殊教育, (9), 89–96
郭庆科, 李芳, 陈雪霞, 王炜丽, 孟庆茂. (2008). 不同条件下拟合指数的表现及临界值的选择. 心理学报, 40(1), 109–118
彭飞. (2013). 社团活动经验与大学生积极发展的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30–34
卫萍. (2016). 小学生积极心理品质与学业成绩的关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (10), 65–70
吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
叶枝, 赵国祥, 务凯, 刘霞. (2017). 积极青少年发展类型特点及其与学校适应的关系——基于潜在剖面分析的实证研究. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 23–31
张婵. (2013). 青少年积极品质的成分、测量及其作用 (博士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
张小菊, 赵敬. (2013). 大学新生父母教养方式与积极心理品质关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (1), 92–96
Adams, B. G., Wiium, N., & Abubakar, A. (2019). Developmental assets and academic performance of adolescents in Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 207–222, doi: 10.1007/s10566-018-9480-z.
Benson, P. L. (2007). Developmental assets: An overview of theory, research, and practice. In R. K. Silbereisen & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Approaches to Positive Youth Development (pp. 33–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.
Choi, J. H., Yu, M., & Kim, K. E. (2015). The effect of Korean adolescents’ developmental assets and gratitude on their happiness: A mediating pathway of gratitude. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S1), 320–326, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/59307.
Conway, R. J., Heary, C., & Hogan, M. J. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement properties of the five Cs model of Positive Youth Development. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1941, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01941.
Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., .. Von Eye, A. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17–71, doi: 10.1177/0272431604272461.
Lerner, R. M., Wang, J., Chase, P. A., Gutierrez, A. S., Harris, E. M., Rubin, R. O., & Yalin, C. (2014). Using relational developmental systems theory to link program goals, activities, and outcomes: The sample case of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2014(144), 17–30, doi: 10.1002/yd.20110.
Lin, N., & Bian, Y. J. (1991). Getting ahead in urban China. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 657–688.
Liu, J., Peng, P., & Luo, L. (2020). The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 49–76, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09494-0.
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387–393.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., Leffert, N., & Blyth, D. A. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4(1), 27–46, doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_3.
Schmid, K. L., Phelps, E., Kiely, M. K., Napolitano, C. M., Boyd, M. J., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 45–56, doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.536777.
Shek, D. T. L., Siu, A. M. H., & Lee, T. Y. (2007). The Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: A validation study. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(3), 380–391, doi: 10.1177/1049731506296196.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453, doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417.
Sohr-Preston, S. L., Scaramella, L. V., Martin, M. J., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L., & Conger, R. (2013). Parental socioeconomic status, communication, and children’s vocabulary development: A third-generation test of the family investment model. Child Development, 84(3), 1046–1062, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12023.
Thompson, R. B., Corsello, M., McReynolds, S., & Conklin-Powers, B. (2013). A longitudinal study of family socioeconomic status (SES) variables as predictors of socio-emotional resilience among mentored youth. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(4), 378–391, doi: 10.1080/13611267.2013.855864.
Weber, M., & Ruch, W. (2012). The role of a good character in 12-year-old school children: Do character strengths matter in the classroom? Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 317–334, doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9128-0.
文章导航

/


版权所有 © 《心理与行为研究》编辑部
地址:天津市西青区宾水西道393号,天津师范大学106#邮箱 邮编:300387
电话:022-23540231, 23541213 E-mail:psybeh@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发