社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚

郭丰波; 黄佳珊; 刘腾飞; 谷莉

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.016

心理与行为研究 >

2022 , Vol. 20 >Issue 3: 397 - 403

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.016

应用心理学

社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚

郭丰波 ,
黄佳珊 ,
刘腾飞 ,
谷莉

展开

广东医科大学人文与管理学院，生命质量与应用心理研究中心，生命质量与心理测评干预重点实验室，东莞 523808

收稿日期: 2021-08-09

网络出版日期: 2022-05-20

基金资助

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目（2020A1515011317）；广东省哲学社会科学规划项目（GD19YXL03）；广东医科大学博士科研启动项目（B2019032）

收起

The Moderation of Bystanders’ Social Responsibility on Their Third-Party Punishment of Intergroup Vicarious Exclusion

GUO Fengbo ,
HUANG Jiashan ,
LIU Tengfei ,
GU Li

Expand

School of Humanities and Management, Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory for Quality of Life and Psychological Assessment and Intervention, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808

Received date: 2021-08-09

Online published: 2022-05-20

Fold

摘要

为了考察群体身份对替代性排斥中旁观者惩罚行为的影响，并考察旁观者社会责任感的调节作用，采用数量估计任务对58名不同社会责任感大学生创设群体身份，观看网络掷球游戏形成群际替代性排斥，随后评估游戏中各玩家的愤怒情绪，并采用第三方惩罚来表达对各玩家表现的愤怒。结果发现高社会责任旁观者对替代性排斥体验到更强愤怒情绪，并对排斥者施加更高惩罚；高社会责任感个体对排斥组内成员的组外排斥者惩罚强度高于组内排斥者，而低社会责任感个体对排斥组外成员的组外排斥者惩罚强度显著高于组内排斥者。结果表明旁观者社会责任感调节其在群际替代性排斥中的第三方惩罚。

关键词： 群体身份; 替代性排斥; 社会责任感; 第三方惩罚; 愤怒情绪

本文引用格式

郭丰波 , 黄佳珊 , 刘腾飞 , 谷莉 . 社会责任感调节群际替代性排斥中旁观者第三方惩罚[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(3) : 397 -403 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.03.016

Abstract

To investigate the effect of group identity on bystanders’ punishment behavior in vicarious exclusion, and to further explore the moderation of the bystanders’ social responsibility, group identities of 58 undergraduates with different social responsibilities were created by using quantity estimation task and completing intergroup vicarious exclusion task via watching cyberball games. Then participants rated each player’s anger and utilized third-party punishment to evaluate players’ performance in the cyberball game. The results showed that the high-social responsibility bystanders experienced stronger anger toward vicarious exclusion and the punishment intensity of them were higher than that of the low-social responsibility bystanders, that is, the anger played a mediating role between social responsibility and punishment when the in-group members were excluded. Moreover, the high-social responsibility bystanders imposed higher intensity of punishment on the out-group excluders than the in-group excluders while the low-social responsibility bystanders imposed higher intensity of punishment on the out-group excluders than the in-group excluders when the out-group members were excluded. The present study provides preliminary evidence that the social responsibility of bystanders moderates their punishment behavior of intergroup vicarious exclusion.

Key words： group identity; vicarious exclusion; social responsibility; third-party punishment; anger

参考文献

陈世平, 薄欣. (2016). 公平与惩罚价格对第三方惩罚需求的影响. 心理与行为研究, 14(3), 372–376
陈思静, 马剑虹. (2011). 第三方惩罚与社会规范激活——社会责任感与情绪的作用. 心理科学, 34(3), 670–675
黄四林, 韩明跃, 张梅. (2016). 人际关系对社会责任感的影响. 心理学报, 48(5), 578–587
纪术茂, 戴郑生. (2004). 明尼苏达多相人格调查表: 最新研究与多类量表解释. 北京: 科学出版社.
沈倩如, 李岩梅. (2020). 父母教养方式对大学生社会责任感的影响: 自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(5), 1042–1046
王亚茹, 吴真, 张珊珊. (2019). 道德公正与加工方式对第三方惩罚的影响. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 706–712
温芳芳, 佐斌. (2018). 最简群体范式的操作、心理机制及新应用. 心理科学, 41(3), 713–719
吴倩. (2020). 大学生社会责任感对第三方惩罚的影响——基于行为与ERPs的研究 (硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学.
杨晓莉, 信同童, 毛玉翠. (2019). 社会排斥的研究范式述评及其对结果的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(2), 237–241
朱晓宇. (2020). 同情对第三方惩罚的影响: 道德愤怒的中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 浙江师范大学, 金华.
Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 167–182, doi: 10.1111/josi.12053.
Arpin, S. N., Froehlich, L., Lantian, A., Rudert, S. C., & Stelter, M. (2017). When “We” or “They” exclude others: Attributing and evaluating ostracism observed in in-groups and out-groups. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2?3), 143–165, doi: 10.1080/23743603.2017.1358477.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87, doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4.
Forbes, H., Stark, A. M., Hopkins, S. W., & Fireman, G. D. (2020). The effects of group membership on college students’ social exclusion of peers and bystander behavior. The Journal of Psychology, 154(1), 15–37, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1642839.
Giesen, A., & Echterhoff, G. (2018). Do I really feel your pain? Comparing the effects of observed and personal ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 550–561, doi: 10.1177/0146167217744524.
Gummerum, M., López-Pérez, B., van Dijk, E., & van Dillen, L. F. (2020). When punishment is emotion-driven: Children’s, adolescents’, and adults’ costly punishment of unfair allocations. Social Development, 29(1), 126–142, doi: 10.1111/sode.12387.
Kubota, J. T., Li, J., Bar-David, E., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2013). The price of racial bias: Intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2498–2504, doi: 10.1177/0956797613496435.
Lelieveld, G. J., Harris, L. T., & van Dillen, L. F. (2020). Jumping on the ‘bad’ wagon? How group membership influences responses to the social exclusion of others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(5), 571–586, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa070.
Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(7), 1452–1463, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x.
Lotz, S., Okimoto, T. G., Schl?sser, T., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2011). Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 477–480, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.004.
Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior. NeuroImage, 55(1), 381–388, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060.
Masuda, N., & Fu, F. (2015). Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism. F1000Prime Report, 7, 27, doi: 10.12703/P7-27.
McAuliffe, K., & Dunham, Y. (2016). Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686), 20150073, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0073.
Mendes, W. B., Major, B., McCoy, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 278–291, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.278.
Pieter, S., Geert-Jan, W., Jorien, V., & Berna, G. (2018). Turning a blind eye? Punishment of friends and unfamiliar peers after observed exclusion in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(2), 508–522.
Poon, K. T., Jiang, Y. F., & Teng, F. (2020). Putting oneself in someone’s shoes: The effect of observing ostracism on physical pain, social pain, negative emotion, and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110217, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110217.
Rudert, S. C., & Greifeneder, R. (2019). Observing ostracism: How observers interpret and respond to ostracism situations. In S. C. Rudert, R. Greifeneder, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Current directions in ostracism, social exclusion, and rejection research (pp. 136–154). Oxford: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9781351255912-9.
Rudert, S. C., Ruf, S., & Greifeneder, R. (2020). Whom to punish? How observers sanction norm-violating behavior in ostracism situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 376–391, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2606.
Spaans, J. P., Will, G. J., van Hoorn, J., & Güro?lu, B. (2019). Turning a blind eye? Punishment of friends and unfamiliar peers after observed exclusion in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(2), 508–522, doi: 10.1111/jora.12401.
Steele, W. R., Schreiber, G. B., Guiltinan, A., Nass, C., Glynn, S. A., Wright, D. J., .. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. (2008). The role of altruistic behavior, empathetic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior. Transfusion, 48(1), 43–54, doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01481.x.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.
Wang, C. S., Sivanathan, N., Narayanan, J., Ganegoda, D. B., Bauer, M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Murnighan, K. (2011). Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 46–54, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007.
Wesselmann, E. D., Bagg, D., & Williams, K. D. (2009). “I Feel Your Pain”: The effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1308–1311, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.003.
Wesselmann, E. D., Wirth, J. H., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Williams, K. D. (2013). When do we ostracize. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 108–115, doi: 10.1177/1948550612443386.
Yang, X. L., Wei, L., Zhao, Q. H., & Liu, L. (2017). Effects of intergroup exclusion on individual needs threat and behavior tendencies. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 429–435, doi: 10.1111/sjop.12378.
Yang, X. L., Xin, T. T., & Zhao, Q. H. (2021). Effects of intergroup vicarious ostracism on individual prejudicial attributions and aggressive intentions. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24, e15, doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.8.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献