语义关联性对重复知盲效应的影响：来自汉语成语的证据

金丽; 吴凤娟; 冷英

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.004

心理与行为研究 >

2022 , Vol. 20 >Issue 4: 457 - 463

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.004

基础心理学

语义关联性对重复知盲效应的影响：来自汉语成语的证据

金丽 ,
吴凤娟 ,
冷英

展开

1. 南通大学教育科学学院，南通 226019;
2. 苏州市学士中心小学校，苏州 215008

收稿日期: 2021-10-27

网络出版日期: 2022-07-20

基金资助

江苏省社会科学基金青年项目（22JYC009）；江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度项目（D/2021/01/146）

收起

The Effect of Semantic Relevance on the Repetition Blindness: Evidence from Chinese Idioms

JIN Li ,
WU Fengjuan ,
LENG Ying

Expand

1. School of Education Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226019;
2. Suzhou Scholar Center Primary School, Suzhou 215008

Received date: 2021-10-27

Online published: 2022-07-20

Fold

摘要

重复知盲是在快速系列视觉呈现任务中对第二个重复刺激的加工缺陷。以汉语中反义字和成语为实验材料，采用全部报告任务，探讨刺激的语义关联性对重复知盲的影响。实验1以汉语单字为材料，采用单因素三水平（目标刺激之间的语义关系：无关、相同、相反）被试内设计，结果是重复字产生重复知盲效应，反义字产生语义启动效应。实验2以成语为材料，采用2（目标刺激之间的语义关系：相同、无关）×2（位置：前位置、后位置）设计，结果是语义关联性消解了重复知盲效应。结果表明：（1）反义字不产生重复知盲效应。（2）语义关联性消解成语中重复字的重复知盲效应。（3）实验结果支持竞争假设。

关键词： 重复知盲; 重复启动; 语义关联性; 成语; 竞争假设

本文引用格式

金丽 , 吴凤娟 , 冷英 . 语义关联性对重复知盲效应的影响：来自汉语成语的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(4) : 457 -463 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.04.004

Abstract

Repetition blindness is the processing defect of the second repeated stimulus in the RSVP task. Using Chinese antonyms and idioms as materials, this study investigated the effect of semantic relevance of stimuli on repetition blindness by using whole reporting task. In experiment 1, Chinese words were used as materials, and a single-factor, three-level within-subject design (semantic relationship between target stimuli: irrelevant/identical/opposite) was used. The results showed that repeated words produced repetition blindness, while antonyms produced semantic priming. In experiment 2, a 2(semantic relationship: identical/irrelevant) × 2(position: anterior/posterior) within-subject design was used. The results showed that the semantic relevance of the stimuli eliminated the repetition blindness. The conclusions are as follows: 1) There is no repetition blindness effect on Chinese antonyms. 2) Semantic relevance has an effect on repetition blindness by eliminating the effect of repeated words in idioms. 3) The results support the competition hypothesis.

Key words： repetition blindness; repetition priming; semantic relevance; idiom; the competition hypothesis

参考文献

北京语言学院语言教学研究所. (1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社.
冷英, 卢家楣, 金丽, 潘发达, 陈燕, 沈永江. (2014). RSVP任务下双刺激重复的优势与劣势. 心理学报, 46(3), 298–311
冷英, 邹煜晖, 莫雷. (2014). 刺激的编码效力对重复知盲的影响. 心理学报, 46(5), 593–606
刘皓明. (2005). 汉字重复知盲发生水平的研究(硕士学位论文). 华南师范大学, 广州.
王爱平, 张厚粲. (2005). 汉字加工中呈现速率对重复知盲效应的影响. 心理科学, 28(4), 809–811, 840.
王瑞琴, 杨小明, 楼俊钢. (2016). 词汇语义相关性度量研究. 情报学报, 35(4), 389–404
王文斌, 高静. (2019). 论汉语四字格成语的块状性和离散性. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 41(2), 3–19
吴光奇, 吴明. (2009). 现代汉语成语词典. 上海: 上海辞书出版社.
夏依婷, 冷英, 陈燕, 王纪妹, 程晓荣, 卢家楣. (2012). 汉语颠倒词加工中重复知盲发生的水平. 心理学报, 44(12), 1583–1595
中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. (2005). 现代汉语词典 (第5版). 北京: 商务印书馆.
周祖谟. (2006). 汉语词汇讲话. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社.
Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 134–147, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.134.
Bond, R., & Andrews, S. (2008). Repetition blindness in sentence contexts: Not just an attribution. Memory & Cognition, 36(2), 295–313, doi: 10.3758/MC.36.2.295.
Burt, J. S., & Jolley, J. (2017). Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1171–1181, doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0726-z.
Chen, Y. C., & Yeh, S. L. (2015). Binding radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47–63, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.10.002.
Dux, P. E., & Coltheart, V. (2008). Repetition blindness and repetition priming: Effects of featural differences between targets and distractors on RSVP dual-target search. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 776–790, doi: 10.3758/MC.36.4.776.
Harris, I. M., Hayward, W. G., Seet, M. S., & Andrews, S. (2021). Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations. Memory & Cognition, 49(6), 1153–1162, doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01146-5.
Jackson, H., & Ze Amvela, E. (2000). Words, meaning and vocabulary: An introduction to modern English lexicology. New York: Continuum.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27(2), 117–143, doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90016-3.
Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30–47, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.30.
Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). Temporal and spatial repetition blindness: Effects of presentation mode and repetition lag on the perception of repeated items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(1), 95–113, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.95.
MacKay, D. G., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Semantic blindness: Repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall under time pressure. Psychological Science, 5(1), 52–55, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00614.x.
Morris, A. L., Still, M. L., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2009). Repetition blindness: An emergent property of inter-item competition. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 338–375, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.001.
Parasuraman, R., & Martin, A. (2001). Interaction of semantic and perceptual processes in repetition blindness. Visual Cognition, 8(1), 103–118, doi: 10.1080/13506280042000045.
Seet, M. S., Andrews, S., & Harris, I. M. (2019). Semantic repetition blindness and associative facilitation in the identification of stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Memory & Cognition, 47(5), 1024–1030, doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00905-9.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Dorken, M. D., & Podrouzek, K. W. (1995). Repeated events in rapid lists: Part 1. Encoding and representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 1670–1688, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1670.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Masson, M. E. J. (2005). Repetition blindness in rapid lists: Activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 54–67, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.54.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献