面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究

金花; 严世振; 单金磊; 刘婷

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.001

心理与行为研究 >

2022 , Vol. 20 >Issue 5: 577 - 584

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.001

基础心理学

面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究

金花 ,
严世振 ,
单金磊 ,
刘婷

展开

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387;
4. 天津工业大学电子与信息工程学院，天津 300387;
5. 天津职业技术师范大学职业教育学院，天津 300222

收稿日期: 2021-09-11

网络出版日期: 2022-09-20

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目（20ZDA079）

收起

The Time Course of the Perception of Animacy: Evidence from ERP

JIN Hua ,
YAN Shizhen ,
SHAN Jinlei ,
LIU Ting

Expand

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387;
4. School of Electronics and Information Engineering, TianGong University, Tianjin 300387;
5. School of Vocational Education, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin 300222

Received date: 2021-09-11

Online published: 2022-09-20

Fold

摘要

本研究采用事件相关电位技术，通过参数设计考察了大脑加工面孔生命性时的神经电活动动态进程。结果显示：非生命性面孔比生命性面孔在中央顶区诱发了更大的LPP波幅；生命性和非生命性面孔诱发的LPP波幅均显著大于中间等级（60%）面孔，提示随生命性信息增强，LPP波幅呈“U”型变化。P1和N170未表现出面孔类别差异。结果表明LPP是探测面孔生命性加工的有效成分，支持面孔生命性加工位于面孔加工的晚期阶段的观点。

关键词： 面孔加工; 生命性知觉; 事件相关电位

本文引用格式

金花 , 严世振 , 单金磊 , 刘婷 . 面孔生命性加工的时间进程：ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(5) : 577 -584 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.05.001

Abstract

In this study, we examined the dynamic time courses of electrophysiological activity during the processing of animacy faces by parametric design using event-related potentials (ERPs). The results showed that inanimacy faces evoked more late positive potential (LPP) amplitude than animacy faces in the central-parietal region. Furthermore, the LPP amplitudes evoked by animacy and inanimacy faces were both significantly larger than that evoked by intermediate animacy strength (60%) faces, suggesting that the electrical signal pattern of LPP changed into a U-shape with the increase in animacy strength. There were no differences between animacy and inanimacy faces in P1 and N170. These results suggest that animacy is processed at the later stage of facial processing, and LPP is an effective index of detection of animacy on face. The results support the two-stage theory of the perception of animacy on face.

Key words： face processing; perception of animacy; ERP

参考文献

郑晨烨, 王静梅, 胡佳, 王一逸, 郑娴, 张莹, 卢英俊. (2015). 面部空间特征关系对真人与卡通面孔吸引力影响的ERP发展性研究. 心理学进展, 5(12), 816–827
Balas, B., & Auen, A. (2019). Perceiving animacy in own-and other-species faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 29, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00029.
Balas, B., & Koldewyn, K. (2013). Early visual ERP sensitivity to the species and animacy of faces. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2876–2881, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.014.
Balas, B., & Tonsager, C. (2014). Face animacy is not all in the eyes: Evidence from contrast chimeras. Perception, 43(5), 355–367, doi: 10.1068/p7696.
Balas, B., van Lamsweerde, A. E., Auen, A., & Saville, A. (2017). The impact of face inversion on animacy categorization. i-Perception, 8(4), 1–16, doi: 10.1177/2041669517723653.
Barry, R. J., Steiner, G. Z., De Blasio, F. M., Fogarty, J. S., Karamacoska, D., & MacDonald, B. (2020). Components in the P300: Don’t forget the novelty P3! Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13371, doi: 10.1111/psyp.13371.
Bowling, N. C., & Banissy, M. J. (2017). Emotion expression modulates perception of animacy from faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 83–95, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.004.
Farid, H., & Bravo, M. J. (2012). Perceptual discrimination of computer generated and photographic faces. Digital Investigation, 8(3–4), 226–235, doi: 10.1016/j.diin.2011.06.003.
Fimreite, V., Ciuffreda, K. J., & Yadav, N. K. (2015). Effect of luminance on the visually-evoked potential in visually-normal individuals and in mTBI/concussion. Brain Injury, 29(10), 1199–1210, doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1035329.
Foti, D., Hajcak, G., & Dien, J. (2009). Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology, 46(3), 521–530, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.x.
Hackel, L. M., Looser, C. E., & van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 15–23, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.001.
Hajcak, G., & Foti, D. (2020). Significance?.. Significance! Empirical, methodological, and theoretical connections between the late positive potential and P300 as neural responses to stimulus significance: An integrative review. Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13570, doi: 10.1111/psyp.13570.
Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010). Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 129–155, doi: 10.1080/87565640903526504.
Joyce, C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(11), 2613–2631, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.005.
Kaminska, O. K., Magnuski, M., Olszanowski, M., Gola, M., Brzezicka, A., & Winkielman, P. (2020). Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(2), 441–454, doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00778-5.
Koldewyn, K., Hanus, P., & Balas, B. (2014). Visual adaptation of the perception of “life”: Animacy is a basic perceptual dimension of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 969–975, doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0562-5.
Liu, P., Forte, J., Sewell, D., & Carter, O. (2018). Cognitive load effects on early visual perceptual processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(4), 929–950, doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1464-9.
Looser, C. E., Guntupalli, J. S., & Wheatley, T. (2013). Multivoxel patterns in face-sensitive temporal regions reveal an encoding schema based on detecting life in a face. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(7), 799–805, doi: 10.1093/scan/nss078.
Looser, C. E., & Wheatley, T. (2010). The tipping point of animacy: How, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1854–1862, doi: 10.1177/0956797610388044.
Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2010). When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 84(2), 192–205, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.013.
Olszanowski, M., Kaminska, O. K., & Winkielman, P. (2018). Mixed matters: Fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications. Cognition and Emotion, 32(5), 1032–1051, doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1386622.
Pendleton, D. M., Sakalik, M. L., Moore, M. L., & Tomporowski, P. D. (2016). Mental engagement during cognitive and psychomotor tasks: Effects of task type, processing demands, and practice. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, 124–131, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.012.
Schindler, S., Zell, E., Botsch, M., & Kissler, J. (2017). Differential effects of face-realism and emotion on event-related brain potentials and their implications for the uncanny valley theory. Scientific Reports, 7, 45003, doi: 10.1038/srep45003.
Schirmer, A., & Adolphs, R. (2017). Emotion perception from face, voice, and touch: Comparisons and convergence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(3), 216–228, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.001.
Schwab, D., Zorjan, S., & Schienle, A. (2021). Face the food: Food plating with facial patterns influences appetite and event-related brain potentials. Motivation and Emotion, 45(1), 95–102, doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09859-x.
Shultz, S., van den Honert, R. N., Engell, A. D., & McCarthy, G. (2015). Stimulus-induced reversal of information flow through a cortical network for animacy perception. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(1), 129–135, doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu028.
Sun, S., Zhen, S. S., Fu, Z. Z., Wu, D. A., Shimojo, S., Adolphs, R., … Wang, S. (2017). Decision ambiguity is mediated by a late positive potential originating from cingulate cortex. Neuroimage, 157, 400–414, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.003.
Terrett, G., Horner, K., White, R., Henry, J. D., Kliegel, M., Labuschagne, I., & Rendell, P. G. (2019). The relationship between episodic future thinking and prospective memory in middle childhood: Mechanisms depend on task type. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 198–213, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.10.003.
Wheatley, T., Weinberg, A., Looser, C., Moran, T., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Mind perception: Real but not artificial faces sustain neural activity beyond the N170/VPP. PLoS One, 6(3), e17960, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017960.
Xiang, J. L., Tang, M., & Wang, X. D. (2022). Adaptation in face animacy perception: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 165, 108118, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108118.
Yu, Q., & Kitayama, S. (2019). Does facial action modulate neural responses of emotion? An examination with the late positive potential (LPP). Emotion, 24(2), 442–446, doi: 10.1037/emo0000717.
Zhao, J. Y., Meng, Q., An, L. C., & Wang, Y. F. (2019). An event-related potential comparison of facial expression processing between cartoon and real faces. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198868, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198868

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献