方岚, 郑苑仪, 金晗, 李晓庆, 杨玉芳, 王瑞明. (2021). 口语句子的韵律边界: 窥探言语理解的秘窗. 心理科学进展, 29(3), 425–437
冯胜利. (2002). 韵律构词与韵律句法之间的交互作用. 中国语文, (6), 515–524
*罗一丽. (2018). 韵律对汉语词汇、短语和句子加工影响的研究——来自ERPs的证据 (博士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
*罗颖艺. (2012). 汉语句子理解中节奏模式加工的神经机制 (博士学位论文). 北京大学.
徐晓东, 刘昌. (2008). 句子理解的关键——对句法和语义关系的再探讨. 心理科学进展, 16(4), 532–540
*于泽. (2011). 书面韵律信息的作用及其加工机制的即时加工研究 (博士学位论文). 辽宁师范大学, 大连.
*张辉, 孙和涛, 顾介鑫. (2012). 非成语四字格词组加工中韵律与句法互动的ERP研究——熟语表征和理解的认知研究之六. 外语与外语教学, (6), 6–11
*张辉, 孙和涛, 顾介鑫. (2013). 成语加工中韵律与句法互动的事件相关电位研究. 外国语, 36(1), 22–31
*张政华, 韩梅, 张放, 李卫君. (2020). 音乐训练促进诗句韵律整合加工的神经过程. 心理学报, 52(7), 847–860
Beier, E. J., & Ferreira, F. (2018). The temporal prediction of stress in speech and its relation to musical beat perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 431.
*Böcker, K. B. E., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Vroomen, J., Brunia, C. H. M., & Gelder, B. (1999). An ERP correlate of metrical stress in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology, 36(6), 706–720.
*Bohn, K., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2013). The influence of rhythmic (ir)regularities on speech processing: Evidence from an ERP study on German phrases. Neuropsychologia, 51(4), 760–771.
Bouwer, F. L., & Honing, H. (2015). Temporal attending and prediction influence the perception of metrical rhythm: Evidence from reaction times and ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1094.
*Breen, M., Fitzroy, A. B., & Oraa Ali, M. (2019). Event-related potential evidence of implicit metric structure during silent reading. Brain Sciences, 9(8), 192, doi: 10.3390/brainsci9080192.
*Broś, K., Meyer, M., Kliesch, M., & Dellwo, V. (2021). Word stress processing integrates phonological abstraction with lexical access—An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 57, 100959.
Canette, L. H., Fiveash, A., Krzonowski, J., Corneyllie, A., Lalitte, P., Thompson, D., .. Tillmann, B. (2020). Regular rhythmic primes boost P600 in grammatical error processing in dyslexic adults and matched controls. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107324, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsy-chologia.2019.107324.
*Cason, N., & Schön, D. (2012). Rhythmic priming enhances the phonological processing of speech. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2652–2658.
*Chen, Q. R., Zhang, J. J., Xu, X. D., Scheepers, C., Yang, Y. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2016). Prosodic expectations in silent reading: ERP evidence from rhyme scheme and semantic congruence in classic Chinese poems. Cognition, 154, 11–21.
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2018). Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 693–706, doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000250.
Clifton, C., Jr., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Sentence and text comprehension: Roles of linguistic structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 167–196, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.167.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
*Domahs, U., Genc, S., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Kabak, B. (2013). Processing (un-)predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 335–354.
*Domahs, U., Knaus, J. A., El Shanawany, H., & Wiese, R. (2014). The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: An ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1151.
*Domahs, U., Knaus, J., Orzechowska, P., & Wiese, R. (2012). Stress “deafness” in a language with fixed word stress: An ERP study on polish. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 439.
*Domahs, U., Wiese, R., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). The processing of German word stress: Evidence for the prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 25(1), 1–36.
Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 130–143, doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.003.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634, doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
Emmendorfer, A. K., Correia, J. M., Jansma, B. M., Kotz, S. A., & Bonte, M. (2020). ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 9917, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66824-x.
Fodor, J. D. (2002). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody (pp. 83–88). Aix-en Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
Fotidzis, T. S., Moon, H., Steele, J. R., & Magne, C. L. (2018). Cross-modal priming effect of rhythm on visual word recognition and its relationships to music aptitude and reading achievement. Brain Sciences, 8(12), 210, doi: 10.3390/brainsci8120210.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392, doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
Gasparini, L., Langus, A., Tsuji, S., & Boll-Avetisyan, N. (2021). Quantifying the role of rhythm in infants’ language discrimination abilities: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 213, 104757, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104757.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
*Henrich, K., Alter, K., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2014). The relevance of rhythmical alternation in language processing: An ERP study on English compounds. Brain and Language, 136, 19–30.
*Henrich, K., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2015a). The influence of syllable number and task-related attention on the perception of rhythmic irregularities: An ERP study on German compounds. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
*Henrich, K., Wiese, R., & Domahs, U. (2015b). How information structure influences the processing of rhythmic irregularities: ERP evidence from German phrases. Neuropsychologia, 75, 431–440.
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560, doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
Holcomb, P. J., Coffey, S. A., & Neville, H. J. (1992). Visual and auditory sentence processing: A developmental analysis using event-related brain potentials. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8(2–3), 203–241.
Jones, A. (2019). Temporal expectancies and rhythmic cueing in touch: The influence of spatial attention. Cognition, 182, 140–150, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.011.
*Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Janßen, U. (2007). The processing of word stress: EEG studies on task-related components. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 709–712). Saarbrücken, Germany: Universitaet des Saarlandes.
*Koso, A., & Hagiwara, H. (2009). Event-related potential evidence of processing lexical pitch-accent in auditory Japanese sentences. Neuroreport, 20(14), 1270–1274.
*Koso, A., Ojima, S., & Hagiwara, H. (2011). An event-related potential investigation of lexical pitch-accent processing in auditory Japanese. Brain Research, 1385, 217–228.
*Kriukova, O., & Mani, N. (2016). Processing metrical information in silent reading: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1432.
Kubozono, H. (2015). Introduction to Japanese phonetics and phonology. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology (pp. 1–42). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119.
Lee, C. S., & Todd, N. P. M. (2004). Towards an auditory account of speech rhythm: Application of a model of the auditory ‘primal sketch’ to two multi-language corpora. Cognition, 93(3), 225–254, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.012.
*Lee, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. M. (2015). Do metrical incongruities disrupt semantic processing in modern Chinese? An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 26(14), 803–808.
Li, X. Q., Shao, X. M., Xia, J. Y., & Xu, X. Y. (2019). The cognitive and neural oscillatory mechanisms underlying the facilitating effect of rhythm regularity on speech comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49, 155–167, doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.05.004.
Luo, C., & Ding, N. (2020). Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives. eLife, 9, e60433, doi: 10.7554/eLife.60433.
*Luo, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). ERP evidence for the online processing of rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading. NeuroImage, 49(3), 2836–2849.
*Magne, C., Astésano, C., Aramaki, M., Ystad, S., Kronland-Martinet, R., & Besson, M. (2007). Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cerebral Cortex, 17(11), 2659–2668.
*Magne, C., Gordon, R. L., & Midha, S. (2010). Influence of metrical expectancy on reading words: An ERP study. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Speech Prosody(p. 432). Chicago.
Magne, C., Jordan, D. K., & Gordon, R. L. (2016). Speech rhythm sensitivity and musical aptitude: ERPs and individual differences. Brain and Language, 153–154, 13–19.
*Marie, C., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2011). Musicians and the metric structure of words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 294–305.
*McCauley, S. M., Hestvik, A., & Vogel, I. (2013). Perception and bias in the processing of compound versus phrasal stress: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Speech, 56(1), 23–44.
Miyamoto, T., & Johnson, C. (2002). Accentual phrasing in Japanese: The significance of underlying accents. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody (pp. 519–522). Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
*Mołczanow, J., Domahs, U., Knaus, J., & Wiese, R. (2013). The lexical representation of word stress in Russian: Evidence from event-related potentials. The Mental Lexicon, 8(2), 164–194.
Nolan, F., & Asu, E. L. (2009). The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 64–77.
Poeppel, D., & Assaneo, M. F. (2020). Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(6), 322–334, doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0304-4.
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
Rothermich, K., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Predictions in speech comprehension: fMRI evidence on the meter-semantic interface. NeuroImage, 70, 89–100, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.013.
*Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2012). Rhythm’s gonna get you: Regular meter facilitates semantic sentence processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(2), 232–244.
*Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Schwartze, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2010). Event-related potential responses to metric violations: Rules versus meaning. NeuroReport, 21(8), 580–584.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M. P., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2013). Speech rhythm facilitates syntactic ambiguity resolution: ERP evidence. PLoS One, 8(2), e56000, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056000.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928, doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926.
Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2008). Entrainment of syntactic processing? ERP-responses to predictable time intervals during syntactic reanalysis. Brain Research, 1226, 144–155, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.017.
*Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2009a). Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the P600. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1693–1708.
*Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2009b). Attention and perceptual regularity in speech. NeuroReport, 20(18), 1643–1647.
*Schmidt-Kassow, M., Roncaglia-Denissen, M. P., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Why pitch sensitivity matters: Event-related potential evidence of metric and syntactic violation detection among Spanish late learners of German. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 131.
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 103–130, doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3.
Takacs, Z. K., & Kassai, R. (2019). The efficacy of different interventions to foster children’s executive function skills: A series of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 145(7), 653–697, doi: 10.1037/bul0000195.
Teki, S., & Griffiths, T. D. (2014). Working memory for time intervals in auditory rhythmic sequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1329.
Tooley, K. M., Konopka, A. E., & Watson, D. G. (2018). Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 625–641.
Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3146–3152, doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00022.
*Zhang, N., & Zhang, Q. F. (2019). Rhythmic pattern facilitates speech production: An ERP study. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 12974.
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., … Schroeder, C. E. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron, 77(5), 980–991, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037.
