内隐韵律与语境对汉语均衡型歧义结构歧义消解的作用
收稿日期: 2021-12-15
网络出版日期: 2023-01-17
基金资助
天津市哲学社会科学规划项目（TJJX19-004）
版权
The Effect of Implicit Prosody and Context on the Disambiguation of Chinese Balanced Ambiguous Structure
Received date: 2021-12-15
Online published: 2023-01-17
Copyright
为检验内隐韵律假说，采用眼动技术探讨了韵律边界及语境信息对汉语均衡型“V+N1+de+N2”歧义结构歧义消解的作用。结果发现，在动宾语境下，韵律边界位于“动词”后（韵律边界引导的意义与语境一致）与韵律边界位于“的”后（韵律边界引导的意义与语境不一致）相比，兴趣区的总注视时间更短，回视入比率更低。这表明，韵律边界与语境一致比不一致时加工更容易，韵律边界与语境一致时促进了歧义结构的歧义消解。研究结论为内隐韵律假说的普遍性提供了汉语的证据。
关键词： 内隐韵律; 语境; 均衡型“V+N1+de+N2”歧义结构; 歧义消解
于秒 , 周思敏 , 龙佳欣 . 内隐韵律与语境对汉语均衡型歧义结构歧义消解的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022 , 20(6) : 739 -746 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.06.004
In order to explore the Implicit Prosody Hypothesis, the present study conducted an eye movement experiment to explore the effect of implicit prosody boundary and context on processing the balanced “V+N1+de+N2” ambiguous structure. The results showed that in the narrative-object context, the total fixation durations were shorter and the regressions-in proportion was lower when the prosodic boundary was located behind the “verb” (the meaning of prosodic boundary guidance is consistent with the context) than when the prosodic boundary was located behind “de” (the meaning of prosodic boundary guidance is inconsistent with the context). This suggests that ambiguous structure is easier to be processed when its meaning guided by prosodic boundary is consistent with the context than when it is inconsistent with the context. These findings provide evidence from Chinese for the universality of the Implicit Prosody Hypothesis.
| 白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (12): 1721- 1729. | |
| 黄彩玉. (2020). 现代汉语多义结构的韵律特征. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社. | |
| 王丹, 郑波, 杨玉芳 韵律特征对句法结构歧义解歧作用的实验研究. 心理科学, 2003, 26 (4): 667- 671. | |
| 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21 (4): 589- 605. | |
| 叶军. (2001). 汉语语句韵律的语法功能. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. | |
| 于秒 “V+N1+的+N2”式歧义词组韵律消解作用的实验研究 . 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 24 (5): 82- 87. | |
| 于秒, 闫国利 内隐韵律与语境影响歧义结构加工的眼动研究. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2015, 48 (8): 686- 691. | |
| 于泽, 韩玉昌 书面韵律边界与语境对歧义句歧义消解的影响. 心理科学, 2011, 34 (6): 1320- 1324. | |
| 于泽, 赵国祥, 任桂琴 书面韵律信息与词汇偏向在歧义句歧义消解中的作用. 心理科学, 2015, 38 (1): 75- 79. | |
| 张慢慢, 臧传丽, 白学军 中文阅读中副中央凹预加工的范围与程度. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28 (6): 871- 882. | |
| 张亚旭. (1998). 汉语局部句法歧义句的加工(博士学位论文). 北京师范大学. | |
| 张亚旭, 张厚粲, 舒华 汉语偏正/述宾歧义短语加工初探. 心理学报, 2000, 32 (1): 13- 19. | |
| Abramson, M. The written voice: Implicit memory effects of voice characteristics following silent reading and auditory presentation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2007, 105 (S3): 1171- 1186. | |
| Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 2005, 96 (3): B89- B100. | |
| Augurzky, P. (2006). Attaching relative clauses in German: The role of implicit and explicit prosody in sentence processing (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. | |
| Augurzky, P., & Kotchoubey, B. Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information—ERP evidence from German. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 81, 31- 49. | |
| Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008, 34 (5): 1277- 1287. | |
| Bates, D., M?chler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67 (1): 1- 48. | |
| Bishop, J. Exploring the similarity between implicit and explicit prosody: Prosodic phrasing and individual differences. Language and Speech, 2021, 64 (4): 873- 899. | |
| Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr. Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 2011, 64 (2): 153- 170. | |
| Breen, M., & Clifton, C., Jr. Stress matters revisited: A boundary change experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013, 66 (10): 1896- 1909. | |
| Breen, M., Fitzroy, A. B., & Ali, M. O. Event-related potential evidence of implicit metric structure during silent reading. Brain Sciences, 2019, 9 (8): 192. | |
| Breen, M., Watson, D. G., & Gibson, E. Intonational phrasing is constrained by meaning, not balance. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2011, 26 (10): 1532- 1562. | |
| Brothers, T., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1894–1906, doi: 10.1037/xlm0000257. | |
| Carlson, K., Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 2001, 45 (1): 58- 81. | |
| Clifton, C., Jr., Carlson, K., & Frazier, L. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 2002, 45 (2): 87- 114. | |
| Cohen, J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65 (3): 145- 153. | |
| Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 1988, 30 (1): 73- 105. | |
| Drury, J. E., Baum, S. R., Valeriote, H., & Steinhauer, K. Punctuation and implicit prosody in silent reading: An ERP study investigating English garden-path sentences. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 1375. | |
| Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 1986, 25 (3): 348- 368. | |
| Fodor, J. D. Learning to parse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1998, 27 (2): 285- 319. | |
| Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East linguistics society (Vol. 32, pp. 112–132). Amherst, MA: GSLA. | |
| Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. | |
| Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10 (6): 244- 249. | |
| Frazier, L., & Gibson, E. (2015). Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor. Cham: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12961-7. | |
| Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14 (2): 178- 210. | |
| Grillo, N., Costa, J., Fernandes, B., & Santi, A. Highs and lows in English attachment. Cognition, 2015, 144, 116- 122. | |
| Hirose, Y. Recycling prosodic boundaries. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2003, 32 (2): 167- 195. | |
| Hwang, H., & Steinhauer, K. Phrase length matters: The interplay between implicit prosody and syntax in Korean “garden path” sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011, 23 (11): 3555- 3575. | |
| Jun, S. A. (2010). The implicit prosody hypothesis and overt prosody in English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1201–1233, doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.503658. | |
| Jun, S. A., & Bishop, J. Priming implicit prosody: Prosodic boundaries and individual differences. Language and Speech, 2015, 58 (4): 459- 473. | |
| Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39(3–4), 159–207, doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0716. | |
| Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 1980, 87 (4): 329- 354. | |
| Kentner, G. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 2012, 123 (1): 1- 20. | |
| Kentner, G., & Vasishth, S. Prosodic focus marking in silent reading: Effects of discourse context and rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7, 319. | |
| Kitagawa, Y., & Fodor, J. D. (2006). Prosodic influence on syntactic judgments. In G. Fanselow, C. Fery, R. Vogel, & M. Schlesewsky (Eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives (pp. 336–358). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
| Li, X. Q., Yang, Y. F., & Lu, Y. How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 2010, 83 (3): 250- 259. | |
| Luo, Y. Y., Duan, Y. Y., & Zhou, X. L. Processing rhythmic pattern during Chinese sentence reading: An eye movement Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6, 1881. | |
| Luo, Y.?Y., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. L. (2013). Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 915–930, doi: 10.1037/a0029182. | |
| MacDonald, M. C. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1994, 9 (2): 157- 201. | |
| Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 1975, 189 (4198): 226- 228. | |
| McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 1998, 38 (3): 283- 312. | |
| Morgan, J. L. A rhythmic bias in preverbal speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35 (5): 666- 688. | |
| Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2003, 25 (4): 501- 528. | |
| Perea, M., & Wang, X. Y. Do alternating-color words facilitate reading aloud text in Chinese? Evidence with developing and adult readers. Memory & Cognition, 2017, 45 (7): 1160- 1170. | |
| Pratt, E. (2017). Prosody in sentence processing. In E. M. Fernández & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 365–391). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | |
| Quinn, D., Abdelghany, H., & Fodor, J. D. (2000). More evidence of implicit prosody in silent reading: French, English and Arabic relative clauses. Poster presented at the 13th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, La Jolla, CA. | |
| R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. | |
| Rayner, K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124 (3): 372- 422. | |
| Rayner, K. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506. | |
| Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1996, 22 (5): 1188- 1200. | |
| Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. Rhythm’s gonna get you: Regular meter facilitates semantic sentence processing. Neuropsychologia, 2012, 50 (2): 232- 244. | |
| Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 2003, 48 (1): 103- 130. | |
| Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(6), 1521–1543, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1521. | |
| Staub, A. Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 2010, 116 (1): 71- 86. | |
| Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007, 136 (1): 64- 81. | |
| Traxler, M. J. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2009, 38 (5): 491- 509. | |
| Tyler, J. Prosodic correlates of discourse boundaries and hierarchy in discourse production. Lingua, 2013, 133, 101- 126. | |
| Westfall, J. (2015). PANGEA: Power analysis for general ANOVA designs. Retrieved January 28, 2022, from http://jakewestfall.org/publications/pangea.pdf. 2022.1.28 | |
| Wijnen, F. (2004). The implicit prosody of jabberwocky and the relative clause attachment riddle. LOT Occasional Series, 2, 169–178. | |
| Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. Direct speech quotations promote low relative-clause attachment in silent reading of English. Cognition, 2018, 176, 248- 254. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |