行为者的忠诚偏向效应：道德价值启动对道德行为及道德判断的影响
收稿日期: 2022-09-15
网络出版日期: 2023-09-13
基金资助
广西自然科学基金(2021JA140666)；广西民族教育发展研究中心重点项目(2022MUZD002)；广西民族教育发展研究中心一般项目(2022MJYJS0014)
版权
Differential Order Loyalty Bias Effect: The Influence of Interpersonal Intimacy and Moral Value Initiation on Behavior and Moral Judgment
Received date: 2022-09-15
Online published: 2023-09-13
Copyright
徐科朋 , 陈佳莉 , 吴家虹 , 杨凌倩 , 欧倩倩 , 罗冬丽 , 张姝玥 . 行为者的忠诚偏向效应：道德价值启动对道德行为及道德判断的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023 , 21(4) : 464 -470 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.04.005
Based on moral foundation theory, this research examined the loyalty bias effect in the process of moral behavior and judgment from the perspectives of observers and actors, and explored the actor-observer separation phenomenon of the loyalty bias effect. The result showed that when participants were actors, in intergroup competition situations, individual moral behaviors and judgments showed a loyalty bias effect, which was more likely to commit loyalty unfair behaviors for the benefit of the group, and gave more lenient moral judgments to this behavior; such effect was weakened by fair value initiation. When participants were observers, the loyalty bias effect disappeared, showing a separation of actors and observers.
Key words： loyalty; fairness; moral judgment; moral foundation theory
| 郭婧, 吕厚超, 黄希庭, 陈小静. 自我服务偏向研究现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (7): 1054- 1060. | |
| 杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (4): 671- 678. | |
| 杨中芳. (1996). 如何研究中国人. 台北: 桂冠图书公司. | |
| Andrejevi?, M., Feuerriegel, D., Turner, W., Laham, S., & Bode, S.. Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10 (1): 17828. | |
| Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I.. The moral machine experiment. Nature, 2018, 563 (7729): 59- 64. | |
| Bocian, K., Cichocka, A., & Wojciszke, B.. Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2021, 93, 104098. | |
| Dmytro, D., Lo, J., O’Leary, J., Fu, G. Y., Lee, K., & Cameron, C. A.. Development of cultural perspectives on verbal deception in competitive contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2014, 45 (8): 1196- 1214. | |
| Fu, G. Y., Luo, Y. C., Heyman, G. D., Wang, B., Cameron, C. A., & Lee, K. (2016). Moral evaluations of lying for one’s own group. Infant and Child Development, 25(5), 355–370. | |
| Gneezy, U.. Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (1): 384- 394. | |
| Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H.. Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101 (2): 366- 385. | |
| Greene, J. D.. Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45 (3): 581- 584. | |
| Guzmán, R. A., Barbato, M. T., Sznycer, D., & Cosmides, L.. A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119 (42): e2214005119. | |
| Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
| Haidt, J.. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 2007, 316 (5827): 998- 1002. | |
| Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon. | |
| Hildreth, J. A. D., & Anderson, C.. Does loyalty trump honesty? Moral judgments of loyalty-driven deceit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2018, 79, 87- 94. | |
| Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M.. Blind loyalty? When group loyalty makes us see evil or engage in it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2016, 132, 16- 36. | |
| Hwang, K. K.. Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 2 (1): 163- 183. | |
| Lau, Y. L., Cameron, C. A., Chieh, K. M., O’Leary, J., Fu, G. Y., & Lee, K.. Cultural differences in moral justifications enhance understanding of Chinese and Canadian children’s moral decisions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2013, 44 (3): 461- 477. | |
| Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S.. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98 (2): 224- 253. | |
| Martin, R., Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P.. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior. Cognition, 2021, 212, 104666. | |
| Misch, A., Over, H., & Carpenter, M.. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: When loyalty trumps other moral concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9, 250. | |
| Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M.. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128 (1): 3- 72. | |
| Pronin, E.. How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 2008, 320 (5880): e1154199. | |
| Renfro, C. L., Duran, A., Stephan, W. G., & Clason, D. L.. The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006, 36 (1): 41- 74. | |
| Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., McDonald, S. A., & Lamoreaux, M. J. (2010). Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(4), 403–423. | |
| Roccas, S., & McCauley, C. (2004). Values and emotions in the relational models. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 263–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. | |
| Watkins, H. M., & Goodwin, G. P.. A fundamental asymmetry in judgments of soldiers at war. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2020, 149 (3): 419- 444. | |
| Watkins, H. M., & Laham, S.. The influence of war on moral judgments about harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2019, 49 (3): 447- 460. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |