汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据

郭梅华; 兰泽波; 巫金根; 李赛男; 吴俊杰; 闫国利

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.001

心理与行为研究 >

2024 , Vol. 22 >Issue 1: 1 - 7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.001

基础心理学

汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据

郭梅华 ,
兰泽波 ,
巫金根 ,
李赛男 ,
吴俊杰 ,
闫国利

展开

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津师范大学心理学部，学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387
2. 闽南师范大学教育与心理学院，闽南师范大学应用心理学研究所，福建省应用认知与人格重点实验室，漳州 363000
3. 福建医科大学健康学院，福州 350122
4. 阳光学院儿童发展与教育学院，福州 350015
5. 天津市教育科学研究院，德育与教育心理研究所，天津 300191

闫国利，E-mail：psyygl@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-09-15

网络出版日期: 2024-05-13

基金资助

2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD190012)。

版权

收起

The Effect of Word Segmentation and Font Size on Perceptual Span in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements

Meihua GUO ,
Zebo LAN ,
Jingen WU ,
Sainan LI ,
Junjie WU ,
Guoli YAN

Expand

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
2. School of Education and Psychology, Institute of Applied Psychology, Fujian Key Laboratory of Applied Cognition and Personality, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000
3. School of Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122
4. College of Child Development and Education, Yango University, Fuzhou 350015
5. Institute of Moral Education and Educational Psychology, Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, Tianjin 300191

Received date: 2022-09-15

Online published: 2024-05-13

Copyright

Fold

摘要

本研究采用移动窗口范式，探讨汉语词切分线索和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响，采用3(词切分线索：不切分、正确词切分、错误词切分)×2(字号：大、小)×4(窗口：L1R2、L1R3、L1R4、整行)的被试内实验设计。结果发现，字号与窗口交互作用不显著，词切分线索、字号与窗口的交互作用也不显著。结果表明，字号对汉语阅读知觉广度的影响可能非常有限，词切分线索也不调节字号对汉语阅读知觉广度的影响。

关键词： 字号; 阅读知觉广度; 词切分线索

本文引用格式

郭梅华 , 兰泽波 , 巫金根 , 李赛男 , 吴俊杰 , 闫国利 . 汉语词切分和字号对阅读知觉广度的影响：眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024 , 22(1) : 1 -7 . DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.01.001

Abstract

Using a moving window paradigm and eye tracker, the present study primarily investigated the effect of word segmentation and font size on perceptual span in Chinese reading. The experiment employed a within-subject experimental design with three factors, that is, word segmentation (no-segmentation, correct-segmentation, wrong-segmentation), font size (large, small), and window condition (L1R2, L1R3, L1R4, Full line). The results showed that there was no significant interaction between font size and window condition, nor significant interaction among word segmentation cues, font size and window condition. These findings suggest that the influence of font size on perceptual span in Chinese reading may be very limited, and word segmentation cues do not moderate this effect.

Key words： font size; perceptual span in reading; word segmentation cues

参考文献

	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19 (5): 606- 611.
	刘志方, 张智君, 田迅. 字号和词频对汉语阅读眼动模式的影响. 人类工效学, 2012, 18 (1): 16- 20.
	王丽红, 闫国利. 阅读知觉广度研究中掩蔽刺激干扰效应的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 2020, 40 (4): 318- 324.
	巫金根, 闫国利, 刘志方. 大小字号的文本对中文读者阅读知觉广度和眼动模式的影响. 心理科学, 2014, 37 (1): 10- 15.
	闫国利, 张巧明, 白学军. 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29 (2): 121- 130.
	Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.. Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 2010, 3 (2): 12- 28.
	Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 2013, 68 (3): 255- 278.
	Bates, D., M?chler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67 (1): 1- 48.
	Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R.. A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999, 22 (4): 661- 674.
	H?iki?, T., Bertram, R., Hy?n?, J., & Niemi, P.. Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009, 102 (2): 167- 181.
	Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading, with a review of the history of reading and writing, and of methods, texts, and hygiene in reading. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
	Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M.. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998, 24 (1): 20- 34.
	Knehr, C. A.. The effects of monocular vision on measures of reading efficiency and perceptual span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 29 (2): 133- 154.
	Li, X. S., Huang, L. J. Q., Yao, P. P., & Hy?n?, J.. Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022, 1 (3): 133- 144.
	Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A.. An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 2020, 127 (6): 1139- 1162.
	Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552.
	Luckiesh, M., & Moss, F. K.. The extent of the perceptual span in reading. The Journal of General Psychology, 1941, 25 (2): 267- 272.
	McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K.. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 1975, 17 (6): 578- 586.
	Meixner, J. M., Nixon, J. S., & Laubrock, J.. The perceptual span is dynamically adjusted in response to foveal load by beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2022, 151 (6): 1219- 1232.
	Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I.. Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 2020, 112, 104092.
	Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C.. Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 2009, 20 (6): 721- 728.
	Morrison, R. E., & Rayner, K.. Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Perception & Psychophysics, 1981, 30 (4): 395- 396.
	O’Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395–453). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
	Osaka, N. (1992). Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: Psychophysics of Japanese text processing. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science, 9(1), 5–13.
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1986, 41 (2): 211- 236.
	Rayner, K.. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009, 62 (8): 1457- 1506.
	Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N.. Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2010, 17 (6): 834- 839.
	Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2003, 26 (4): 445- 476.
	Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482–490.
	Sperlich, A., Meixner, J., & Laubrock, J.. Development of the perceptual span in reading: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2016, 146, 181- 201.
	Sperlich, A., Schad, D. J., & Laubrock, J.. When preview information starts to matter: Development of the perceptual span in German beginning readers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2015, 27 (5): 511- 530.
	Su, J., Yin, G. E., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Kurtev, S., Warrington, K. L., ... Paterson, K. B. (2020). Flexibility in the perceptual span during reading: Evidence from Mongolian. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(4), 1566–1572.
	Xie, F., Wang, J. X., Hao, L. S., Zhang, X., & Warrington, K. L.. Perceptual span is independent of font size for older and young readers: Evidence from Chinese. Psychology and Aging, 2020, 35 (7): 1026- 1040.
	Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J. E., & Zhou, X. L.. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010, 36 (6): 1669- 1676.
	Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R.. Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 2015, 41 (1): 209- 219.
	Zhou, W., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M.. A validation of parafoveal semantic information extraction in reading Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 2013, 36 (Suppl. 1): S51- S63.

Options

摘要页面

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献