自恋双面性与行为系统的关系：性别的调节作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.01.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探索不同自恋得分的个体对奖赏与惩罚的敏感性及性别在其中的作用，本研究采用钦佩–竞争自恋问卷(NARQ)、BIS/BAS量表在483名在校大学生中进行调查。对数据进行共同方法偏差检验、相关分析以及基于多元回归的调节效应检验，结果发现：(1)钦佩性自恋与行为趋近系统存在显著正相关，与行为抑制系统存在显著负相关；(2)竞争性自恋与行为抑制系统存在显著正相关，而与行为趋近系统的相关不显著；(3)性别在自恋双面性与行为系统之间起调节作用。结果表明，女性自恋双面性得分越高，对奖赏和惩罚均越敏感；在男性被试中未表现出这种模式。

关键词: 钦佩性自恋, 竞争性自恋, 行为抑制系统, 行为趋近系统, 调节作用

Abstract:

This study aimed to investigate the effects of two-sided narcissism on the sensitivity of reward and punishment as well as to test the moderate role of gender in the link between narcissistic admiration-rivalry and the behavioral inhibition/approach system. Four hundred and eighty-three college students were randomly recruited from a university. All participants completed Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ) and BIS/BAS items online. The results showed that: 1) admiration narcissism was positively correlated with behavioral approach system and negatively correlated with behavioral inhibition system; 2) rivalry narcissism positively correlated with behavioral inhibition system, but no correlation was observed with the behavioral approach system; and 3) gender played a moderating role in the relationship between two sides of narcissism and behavioral system. In summary, females are more sensitive to both reward and punishment than males.

Key words: admiration narcissism, rivalry narcissism, behavioral inhibition system, behavioral approach system, moderation effect

中图分类号:

B842

任芬, 刘拓, 齐保莉, 徐绍恒, 凌钲程. 自恋双面性与行为系统的关系：性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 36-42.

Fen REN, Tuo LIU, Baoli QI, Shaoheng XU, Zhengcheng LING. The Relationship Between Two Faces of Narcissism and Behavioral System: Moderation Effect of Gender[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(1): 36-42.

图/表 5

参考文献

	程浩, 张亚利, 姚雪, 张向葵自恋与行为抑制/激活系统的关系: 元分析. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29 (10): 1796- 1807.
	丁如一, 周晖, 张豹, 陈晓自恋与青少年亲社会行为之间的关系. 心理学报, 2016, 48 (8): 981- 988.
	郭丰波, 张振, 原胜, 敬一鸣, 王益文自恋型人格的理论模型与神经生理机制. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24 (8): 1246- 1256.
	郭少聃, 何金莲, 张利燕强化敏感性人格理论述评. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17 (2): 390- 395.
	何宁, 朱云莉自爱与他爱: 自恋、共情与内隐利他的关系. 心理学报, 2016, 48 (2): 199- 210.
	李彦章, 张燕, 姜英, 李航, 米沙, 易光杰, 姜原行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版的信效度分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2008, 22 (8): 613- 616. DOI
	汤丹丹, 温忠麟共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (1): 215- 223.
	周浩, 龙立荣共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950. DOI
	周晖, 周晖, 张豹自恋与共情及亲社会行为的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18 (2): 228- 231.
	Anderson, K., & Costello, P. Relationships between prosocial behavior, spirituality, narcissism, and satisfaction with life. Journal of Gustavus Undergraduate Psychology, 2009, 5, 1- 28.
	Atkinson, J., Sharp, C., Schmitz, J., & Yaroslavsky, I. Behavioral activation and inhibition, negative affect, and gambling severity in a sample of young adult college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2012, 28 (3): 437- 449. DOI
	Back, M. D. (2018). The narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept. In A. D. Hermann, A. B. Brunell, & J. D. Foster (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism (pp. 57–67). Cham, Switerland: Springer.
	Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013, 105 (6): 1013- 1037. DOI
	Cai, H. J., Kwan, V. S. Y., & Sedikides, C. A sociocultural approach to narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality, 2012, 26 (5): 529- 535. DOI
	Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency Model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. The self. (pp. 115−138). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
	Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67 (2): 319- 333. DOI
	Corr, P. J. Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2004, 28 (3): 317- 332.
	Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 2019, 87 (6): 1151- 1169. DOI
	Foster, J. D., & Brennan, J. C. (2012). Narcissism, the agency model, and approach-avoidance motivation. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 89−100). New York: Wiley.
	Gao, S., Thomaes, S., van Den Noortgate, W. V., Xie, X. C., Zhang, X. K., & Wang, S. P. Recent changes in narcissism of Chinese youth: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 2008–2017. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 148, 62- 66. DOI
	Gray, J. A. Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 1987, 21 (4): 493- 509. DOI
	Green, A., MacLean, R., & Charles, K. Corrigendum to “Unmasking gender differences in narcissism within intimate partner violence” [Personality and Individual Differences 167 (2020) 1–6/110247]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2021, 173, 110658. DOI
	Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., & Yan, T. Y. Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2015, 141 (2): 261- 310. DOI
	Jonason, P. K., & Jackson, C. J. The dark triad traits through the lens of reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 90, 273- 277. DOI
	Khoshfetrat, A., Scully, D., & Fassbender, C. Effects of behavioral inhibition/activation systems on anger rumination and anger expression through difficulty in emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 191, 111574. DOI
	Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2018, 22 (1): 3- 31. DOI
	Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2015, 109 (5): 856- 871. DOI
	Leckelt, M., Wetzel, E., Gerlach, T. M., Ackerman, R. A., Miller, J. D., Chopik, W. J., ... Back, M. D. Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 2018, 30 (1): 86- 96. DOI
	MacLaren, V. V., & Best, L. A. Disagreeable narcissism mediates an effect of BAS on addictive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 2013, 55 (2): 101- 105. DOI
	Manley, H., Paisarnsrisomsuk, N., & Roberts, R. (2020). The effect of narcissistic admiration and rivalry on speaking performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 154109624.
	Miles, G. J., Smyrnios, K. X., Jackson, M., & Francis, A. J. P. Reward-punishment sensitivity bias predicts narcissism subtypes: Implications for the etiology of narcissistic personalities. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019, 141, 143- 151. DOI
	Oniszczenko, W. The association between BIS/BAS and fear of COVID-19 infection among women. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 2021, 9 (3): 237- 245. DOI
	Raskin, R., & Terry, H. A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1988, 54 (5): 890- 902.
	Ren, F., Wang, M. C., Li, X. M., & Luo, J. Differences in dark triad personality: Evidence from China and the USA. Current Psychology, 2022, 41 (12): 9103- 9108. DOI
	Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J. The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, 10 (4): 320- 335. DOI
	Subramanian, Ł., Sękowski, M., & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral activation system (BAS), and grandiose facets of narcissism. Current Psychology, 2022, 41 (6): 4125- 4131. DOI
	Urošević, S., Collins, P., Muetzel, R., Lim, K. O., Luciana, M. Longitudinal changes in behavioral approach system sensitivity and brain structures involved in reward processing during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 2012, 48 (5): 1488- 1500. DOI
	Weiss, B., Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. Evaluating the instantiation of narcissism components in contemporary measures of psychopathy. Assessment, 2021, 28 (1): 15- 28. DOI
	Wink, P. Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61 (4): 590- 597. DOI
	Włodarska, K. A., Zyskowska, E., Terebus, M. K., & Rogoza, R. The dark triad and BIS/BAS: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 2021, 40 (11): 5349- 5357. DOI
	Wurst, S. N., Gerlach, T. M., Dufner, M., Rauthmann, J. F., Grosz, M. P., Küfner, A. C., ... & Back, M. D. Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2017, 112 (2): 280- 306. DOI
	Zhou, H., Li, Y., Zhang, B. & Zeng, M. The relationship between narcissism and friendship qualities in adolescents: Gender as a moderator. Sex Roles, 2012, 67 (7): 452- 462.

模型	χ²	df	RMSEA	CFI	TLI	RMR
特质因子模型	4859.66	665	0.11	0.35	0.32	0.15
双因子模型	2276.46	626	0.07	0.75	0.71	0.06

模型	χ²	df	RMSEA	CFI	TLI	RMR
特质因子模型	4859.66	665	0.11	0.35	0.32	0.15
双因子模型	2276.46	626	0.07	0.75	0.71	0.06

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1.行为抑制	19.93	2.71
2.行为驱力	11.64	1.86	0.07
3.行为愉悦	11.60	1.81	0.18**	0.52**
4.行为奖励	15.79	2.06	0.38**	0.65**	0.58**
5.自大	9.92	2.85	−0.17**	0.26**	0.12	0.13**
6.独特	11.99	2.52	0.08	0.26**	0.26**	0.32**	0.56**
7.魅力	9.00	2.71	−0.22**	0.25**	0.16**	0.07	0.60**	0.48**
8.贬损	7.17	2.73	0.07	−0.05	0.12**	−0.05	0.13**	0.11*	0.14**
9.至高无上	10.05	3.07	0.21**	0.07	0.10*	0.16*	0.23**	0.39**	0.28**	0.30**
10.攻击	9.33	2.72	0.32**	0.01	0.08	0.04	0.22**	0.39**	0.27**	0.30**	0.50**

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1.行为抑制	19.93	2.71
2.行为驱力	11.64	1.86	0.07
3.行为愉悦	11.60	1.81	0.18**	0.52**
4.行为奖励	15.79	2.06	0.38**	0.65**	0.58**
5.自大	9.92	2.85	−0.17**	0.26**	0.12	0.13**
6.独特	11.99	2.52	0.08	0.26**	0.26**	0.32**	0.56**
7.魅力	9.00	2.71	−0.22**	0.25**	0.16**	0.07	0.60**	0.48**
8.贬损	7.17	2.73	0.07	−0.05	0.12**	−0.05	0.13**	0.11*	0.14**
9.至高无上	10.05	3.07	0.21**	0.07	0.10*	0.16*	0.23**	0.39**	0.28**	0.30**
10.攻击	9.33	2.72	0.32**	0.01	0.08	0.04	0.22**	0.39**	0.27**	0.30**	0.50**

因变量	自变量	B	t	95%置信区间	R²	F
BIS	钦佩性自恋	−0.05	−1.75	[−0.10, 0.00]	2.6%	4.36**
BIS	性别	0.55	2.09**	[0.03, 1.06]
	钦佩性自恋×性别	0.00	0.02	[−0.07, 0.07]
BAS	钦佩性自恋	0.29	1.78	[−0.01, 0.18]	10.1%	17.85**
	性别	0.29	0.65	[−0.59, 1.18]
	钦佩性自恋×性别	0.21	3.33**	[0.09, 0.34]
BIS	竞争性自恋	0.07	2.38**	[0.01, 0.13]	10.6%	18.84**
	性别	0.91	3.59**	[0.41, 1.41]
	竞争性自恋×性别	0.08	2.05**	[0.00, 0.15]
BAS	竞争性自恋	−0.12	−2.00**	[−0.23, −0.00]	3.8%	6.41**
	性别	−0.06	−0.12	[−0.99, 0.88]
	竞争性自恋×性别	0.28	3.93**	[0.14, 0.42]