冲动性暴力犯愤怒条件下的阈上阈下反应抑制受损

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究使用情绪性Go/No-go任务(实验1)和掩蔽版Go/No-go任务(实验2)，考察暴力犯和对照组在中性条件和愤怒条件下的阈上阈下反应抑制能力。实验1发现，相比中性条件下，暴力犯和对照组在愤怒条件下Go反应时更短，No-go错误率更高；愤怒条件下暴力犯比对照组Go反应时更短，No-go错误率更高。实验2发现，相比中性条件下，在愤怒条件下暴力犯No-go反应时和RT-slowing更短，而对照组无显著差异；在愤怒条件下，暴力犯比对照组No-go反应时和RT-slowing更短。结果表明，相比中性条件下，愤怒条件下暴力犯呈现阈上阈下反应抑制受损；愤怒条件下，暴力犯比对照组阈上阈下反应抑制表现差。

关键词: 冲动性暴力犯, 阈下反应抑制, 阈上反应抑制, 愤怒条件

Abstract:

The present study utilized an emotional Go/No-go task (Experiment 1) and a masked Go/No-go task (Experiment 2) to examine the conscious and unconscious response inhibition abilities of violent offenders and a control group with neutral and angry emotional conditions. In Experiment 1, we found that both the control group and violent offenders had shorter Go reaction times and higher No-go error rates with the angry condition compared to the neutral condition. We also found that with the angry condition, violent offenders had even shorter Go reaction times and higher No-go error rates than the control group. In Experiment 2, the results showed that compared to the neutral condition, violent offenders had shorter No-go reaction times and RT-slowing on the angry condition, while no such significant differences were observed in the control group. Violent offenders had shorter No-go reaction times and RT-slowing under the angry condition compared to the control group. The results indicate that, compared to the neutral condition, violent offenders exhibit impaired conscious and unconscious response inhibitions on the angry condition. Additionally, the performance of violent offenders in conscious and unconscious response inhibitions are worse on the angry condition than that of the control group.

Key words: impulsive violent offenders, unconscious response inhibition, conscious response inhibition, angry condition

毋嫘, 张之宇, 张晋, 覃丹泓, 李紫熙, 康威. 冲动性暴力犯愤怒条件下的阈上阈下反应抑制受损[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 410-417.

Lei WU, Zhiyu ZHANG, Jin ZHANG, Danhong QIN, Zixi LI, Wei KANG. Impairment in Conscious and Unconscious Response Inhibitions of Impulsive Violent Offenders on the Angry Condition[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 410-417.

图/表 6

图1 情绪性Go/No-go任务流程图

图2 暴力犯与对照组的Go反应时注：*p<0.05，***p<0.001，以下同。

图3 暴力犯与对照组的No-go错误率

图4 掩蔽版Go/No-go任务流程图

表1 暴力犯与对照组在不同情绪条件下阈下Go/No-go任务的反应时[M(SD)](ms)

条件	试次	暴力犯(n=46)	对照组(n=49)
中性情绪条件	Go	363(62)	440(72)
中性情绪条件	No-go	464(124)	515(66)
愤怒情绪条件	Go	379(70)	435(74)
愤怒情绪条件	No-go	395(72)	507(63)

图5 暴力犯与对照组的RT-slowing平均值

参考文献 0

	龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (1): 40- 46. DOI
	李志爱, 彭程, Ding C, 张庆林, 杨东. 暴力犯罪者对负性情绪信息注意偏向的ERP研究. 心理科学, 2014, 37 (4): 936- 943.
	罗亚莉, 张大均, 刘云波, 刘衍玲. 特质愤怒量表中文版在大学生人群应用的信度和效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (9): 700- 704. DOI
	苗小翠, 胡朋利, 张仲明. 不同心理一致感个体对情绪信息的注意偏向. 心理学探新, 2017, 37 (6): 500- 505.
	乔屹, 谢斌, 张明岛. 冲动-预谋性攻击行为量表中文版的信效度检验. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2009, 18 (4): 366- 368. DOI
	辛勇, 李红, 袁加锦. 负性情绪干扰行为抑制控制: 一项事件相关电位研究. 心理学报, 2010, 42 (3): 334- 341.
	杨惠淋. (2023). 情绪情景性语言对军队冲动性人格倾向者的冲动诱发作用研究(硕士学位论文). 中国人民解放军空军军医大学, 重庆.
	杨丽珠, 杜文轩, 沈悦. 特质愤怒与反应性攻击的综合认知模型述评. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19 (9): 1249- 1258.
	Battaglia, S., Cardellicchio, P., Di Fazio, C., Nazzi, C., Fracasso, A., & Borgomaneri, S. Stopping in (e)motion: Reactive action inhibition when facing valence-independent emotional stimuli. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2022, 16, 998714. DOI
	Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
	Brown, M. R., Lebel, R. M., Dolcos, F., Wilman, A. H., Silverstone, P. H., Pazderka, H., ... Dursun, S. M. Effects of emotional context on impulse control. NeuroImage, 2012, 63 (1): 434- 446. DOI
	Chen, C. Y., Muggleton, N. G., & Chang, J. R. Inefficiency of post-error adjustment in impulsive violent offenders. NeuroReport, 2014, 25 (13): 1024- 1029. DOI
	Chiu, P. H., Holmes, A. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. Dissociable recruitment of rostral anterior cingulate and inferior frontal cortex in emotional response inhibition. NeuroImage, 2008, 42 (2): 988- 997. DOI
	Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006, 10 (5): 204- 211. DOI
	Diao, L. T., Li, W. P., Fan, L. X., Valesi, R., & Ma, Q. G. Dissociable neural oscillatory mechanisms underlying unconscious priming of externally and intentionally initiated inhibition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2021, 162, 121- 129. DOI
	Diao, L. T., Qi, S. Q., Xu, M. S., Li, Z. A., Ding, C., Chen, A., … Yang, D. Neural signature of reward-modulated unconscious inhibitory control. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2016, 107, 1- 8. DOI
	Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 2003, 64 (1–2): 7- 26. DOI
	Feola, B., Sand, L., Atkins, S., Bunting, M., Dougherty, M., & Bolger, D. J. Overlapping and unique brain responses to cognitive and response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 2023, 166, 105958. DOI
	Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 1992, 18 (4): 1030. DOI
	Goldstein, M., Brendel, G., Tuescher, O., Pan, H., Epstein, J., Beutel, M., ... Silbersweig, D. Neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and motor inhibitory control: An emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI study. NeuroImage, 2007, 36 (3): 1026- 1040. DOI
	Kalanthroff, E., Cohen, N., & Henik, A. Stop feeling: Inhibition of emotional interference following stop-signal trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2013, 7, 78.
	Meijers, J., Harte, J. M., Meynen, G., Cuijpers, P., & Scherder, E. J. A. Reduced self-control after 3 months of imprisonment; A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9, 69. DOI
	Puiu, A. A., Wudarczyk, O., Kohls, G., Bzdok, D., Herpertz-Dahlmann, B., & Konrad, K. Meta-analytic evidence for a joint neural mechanism underlying response inhibition and state anger. Human Brain Mapping, 2020, 41 (11): 3147- 3160. DOI
	Ron-Grajales, A., Sanz-Martin, A., Castañeda-Torres, R. D., Esparza-López, M., Ramos-Loyo, J., & Inozemtseva, O. Effect of mindfulness training on inhibitory control in young offenders. Mindfulness, 2021, 12 (7): 1822- 1838. DOI
	Snijder, J. P., Tang, R. X., Bugg, J. M., Conway, A. R. A., & Braver, T. S. On the psychometric evaluation of cognitive control tasks: An investigation with the dual mechanisms of cognitive control (DMCC) battery. Behavior Research Methods, 2023, 56 (3): 1604- 1639. DOI
	Spielberger, C. D., Sydeman, S. J., Owen, A. E., & Marsh, B. J. (1999). Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 993–1021). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
	Stanford, M. S., Houston, R. J., Mathias, C. W., Villemarette-Pittman, N. R., Helfritz, L. E., & Conklin, S. M. Characterizing aggressive behavior. Assessment, 2003, 10 (2): 183- 190. DOI
	Stockdale, L. A., Morrison, R. G., & Silton, R. L. The influence of stimulus valence on perceptual processing of facial expressions and subsequent response inhibition. Psychophysiology, 2020, 57 (2): e13467. DOI
	Straub, E. R., Schmidts, C., Kunde, W., Zhang, J. H., Kiesel, A., & Dignath, D. (2022). Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction—Congruency in the color stroop task does not modulate the emotional stroop effect. Cognitive & Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 22(1), 21–41.
	Suhler, C. L., & Churchland, P. S. Control: Conscious and otherwise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009, 13 (8): 341- 347. DOI
	Sun, L. J., Li, J. Y., Niu, G. F., Zhang, L., & Chang, H. J. Reactive aggression affects response inhibition to angry expressions in adolescents: An event-related potential study using the emotional go/no-go paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 558461. DOI
	Tamietto, M., & de Gelder, B. Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2010, 11 (10): 697- 709. DOI
	Taylor, T. L., & Therrien, M. E. Inhibition of return for faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 2005, 67 (8): 1414- 1422.
	van Gaal, S., Lamme, V. A. F., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. Dissociable brain mechanisms underlying the conscious and unconscious control of behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011, 23 (1): 91- 105. DOI
	van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. Journal of Neuroscience, 2008, 28 (32): 8053- 8062. DOI
	van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2010, 30 (11): 4143- 4150. DOI
	van Gaal, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Lamme, V. A. F. Dissociating consciousness from inhibitory control: Evidence for unconsciously triggered response inhibition in the stop-signal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009, 35 (4): 1129- 1139. DOI
	Vedelago, L., Amlung, M., Morris, V., Petker, T., Balodis, I., McLachlan, K., ... MacKillop, J. Technological advances in the assessment of impulse control in offenders: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2019, 37 (4): 435- 451.
	Wokke, M. E., van Gaal, S., Scholte, H. S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Lamme, V. A. F. The flexible nature of unconscious cognition. PLoS One, 2011, 6 (9): e25729. DOI
	Yang, Q., & Pourtois, G. Conflict-driven adaptive control is enhanced by integral negative emotion on a short time scale. Cognition and Emotion, 2018, 32 (8): 1637- 1653. DOI
	Yang, S. Y., Luo, W. B., Zhu, X. R., Broster, L. S., Chen, T. L., Li, J. Z., & Luo, Y. J. Emotional content modulates response inhibition and perceptual processing. Psychophysiology, 2014, 51 (11): 1139- 1146. DOI
	Zher-Wen, & Yu, R. J. Perceptual and semantic same-different processing under subliminal conditions. Consciousness and Cognition, 2023, 111, 103523. DOI