被动干扰会引发主动行为吗？科技干扰对大学生手机冷落行为的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.04.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨科技干扰与大学生手机冷落行为的关系，以及无手机恐惧、环境敏感性和社会比较倾向在其中的作用，研究采用科技干扰量表、环境敏感性量表、无手机恐惧量表中文版、社会比较倾向量表中文版和手机冷落行为量表中文版对2000名大学生进行调查。结果显示：(1)在控制性别和年龄之后，科技干扰显著正向影响大学生手机冷落行为；(2)无手机恐惧在科技干扰与大学生手机冷落行为之间起部分中介作用；(3)环境敏感性和社会比较倾向分别调节“科技干扰→无手机恐惧→手机冷落行为”这一中介作用的前半段路径和后半段路径。简而言之，科技干扰与手机冷落行为之间既存在中介效应，又存在调节效应。该研究揭示了科技干扰与手机冷落行为的关系及其个体差异，为降低大学生的手机冷落行为提供实证支持和理论依据。

关键词: 科技干扰, 环境敏感性, 无手机恐惧, 社会比较倾向, 手机冷落行为

Abstract:

In order to explore the relationship between technoference and college students’ phubbing, as well as the roles of nomophobia, environmental sensitivity and social comparison orientation, this study used the Technoference Scale, Environmental Sensitivity Scale, Chinese Version of Nomophobia Scale, Social Comparative Orientation Scale and Phubbing Scale to survey 2000 students. The results showed that: 1) technoference significantly negatively predicted college students’ phubbing when the influences of gender and age were controlled; 2) nomophobia partially mediated the relationship between technoference and phubbing; 3) the first and second half of the mediating pathways of technoference, nomophobia, and college students’ phubbing were moderated by environmental sensitivity and social comparison orientation. In short, there are both mediating and moderating effects between technoference and college students’ phubbing. The current study reveals the relationship between technoference and college students’ phubbing and individual differences, which provides empirical support and theoretical basis for reducing college students’ phubbing behavior.

Key words: technoference, environmental sensitivity, nomophobia, social comparison orientation, phubbing

何安明, 詹永吉, 惠秋平. 被动干扰会引发主动行为吗？科技干扰对大学生手机冷落行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 509-515.

Anming HE, Yongji ZHAN, Qiuping HUI. Does Passive Interference Induce Active Behavior? The Influence of Technoference on Phubbing Among College Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(4): 509-515.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	丁子恩, 刘勤学. 科技干扰与青少年网络游戏成瘾: 归属需求的中介作用与友谊质量的调节作用. 心理科学, 2022, 45 (6): 1383- 1389.
	龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27 (7): 1258- 1267.
	何安明, 詹永吉, 惠秋平. 青少年生活事件与获得感的关系: 公正世界信念的中介作用和手机冷落行为的调节作用. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 43 (6): 48- 55.
	惠秋平, 王振宏, 何安明. 手机冷落行为量表中文版在我国青少年中的信度和效度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30 (5): 1179- 1182.
	蒋欣玥, 林悦, 刘勤学. 父母心理控制与青少年智能手机成瘾: 心理需求网络满足和环境敏感性的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38 (2): 254- 262.
	李沛玲. (2022). 中学生生命意义感与手机冷落行为关系研究——错失焦虑的中介作用和领悟社会支持的调节作用(硕士学位论文). 喀什大学.
	林崇德, 李庆安. 青少年期身心发展特点. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2005, (1): 48- 56.
	刘勤学, 祁迪, 周宗奎. 科技干扰与青少年智能手机成瘾的关系: 情绪症状和环境敏感性的作用. 心理科学, 2021, 44 (3): 583- 590.
	刘肖岑, 耿淑靓, 徐珂, 黄翯青. 父母低头行为与亲子关系: 学前儿童情绪不稳和外化问题行为的链式中介作用. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, (6): 121- 128.
	任世秀, 古丽给娜, 刘拓. 中文版无手机恐惧量表的修订. 心理学探新, 2020, 40 (3): 247- 253.
	王明姬, 王垒, 施俊琦. 社会比较倾向量表中文版的信效度检验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2006, 20 (5): 302- 305, 316. DOI
	王素娟, 孙颖, 张亚利, 张雅明. 社会排斥与青少年低头行为的关系: 有调节的中介模型. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2023, 31 (5): 739- 743.
	吴文峰, 李婷, 卢永彪, 赵守盈. 大学生社会比较倾向与抑郁: 人际自立影响的性别差异. 心理科学, 2019, 42 (3): 591- 597.
	肖曼曼. (2020). 父母低头症对青少年手机成瘾倾向的影响——家庭亲密度和负性情绪的链式中介作用(硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
	姚梦萍, 贾振彪, 陈欣, 周静. 大学生无聊倾向与手机依赖行为关系. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31 (2): 215- 217. DOI
	叶宝娟, 杨雪, 陈传升, 杨强. 大学生受欺负与攻击行为的关系: 相对剥夺感的中介作用和日常环境中的暴力暴露的调节作用. 心理科学, 2021, 44 (2): 309- 315.
	张琳, 张如静. 基于使用与满足理论的大学生手机媒介应用研究. 聊城大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 29 (4): 75- 81.
	赵俊洁, 和爱林, 朱海娟. 错失恐惧对大学生手机冷落行为的影响: 手机成瘾和自我控制的作用. 教育生物学杂志, 2020, 8 (4): 245- 249. DOI
	Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2012, 16 (3): 262- 282. DOI
	Balta, S., Emirtekin, E., Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. Neuroticism, trait fear of missing out, and phubbing: The mediating role of state fear of missing out and problematic Instagram use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2020, 18 (3): 628- 639. DOI
	Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 2013, 25 (4): 1243- 1261.
	Campos, J. J., Campos, R. G., & Barrett, K. C. Emergent themes in the study of emotional development and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 1989, 25 (3): 394- 402. DOI
	Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7 (2): 117- 140. DOI
	Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Kaye, L. K., & Redding, C. My virtual friend: A qualitative analysis of the attitudes and experiences of smartphone users: Implications for smartphone attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 75, 347- 355. DOI
	Homberg, J. R., Schubert, D., Asan, E., & Aron, E. N. Sensory processing sensitivity and serotonin gene variance: Insights into mechanisms shaping environmental sensitivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2016, 71, 472- 483.
	Jessor, R. Problem-behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British Journal of Addiction, 1987, 82 (4): 331- 342. DOI
	Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., .. Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60–74.
	Konok, V., Gigler, D., Bereczky, B. M., & Miklósi, Á. Humans’ attachment to their mobile phones and its relationship with interpersonal attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 61, 537- 547. DOI
	Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (2006). Dynamics of individual←→context relations in human development: A developmental systems perspective. In J. C. Thomas, D. L. Segal, M. Hersen, J. C. Thomas, D. L. Segal, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology: Vol. 1: Personality and everyday functioning (pp. 23–43). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
	McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2016, 5 (1): 85- 98. DOI
	McDaniel, B. T., & Radesky, J. S. Technoference: Parent distraction with technology and associations with child behavior problems. Child Development, 2018, 89 (1): 100- 109. DOI
	Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the highly sensitive child scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 2018, 54 (1): 51- 70. DOI
	Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139 (4): 901- 916. DOI
	Tomczyk, Ł., & Lizde, E. S. Nomophobia and Phubbing: Wellbeing and new media education in the family among adolescents in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Children and Youth Services Review, 2022, 137, 106489. DOI
	White, J. B., Langer, E. J., Yariv, L., & Welch, J. C. Frequent social comparisons and destructive emotions and behaviors: The dark side of social comparisons. Journal of Adult Development, 2006, 13 (1): 36- 44. DOI
	Yildirim, C., Sumuer, E., Adnan, M., & Yildirim, S. A growing fear: Prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Development, 2016, 32 (5): 1322- 1331. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.性别
2.年龄
3.科技干扰	25.83	8.00	0.01	0.07*
4.环境敏感性	63.16	10.75	0.06*	0.06	0.37***
5.无手机恐惧	67.91	20.51	0.06*	0.11**	0.36***	0.35***
6.社会比较倾向	35.72	5.85	−0.01	0.10**	0.39***	0.39***	0.40***
7.手机冷落行为	31.37	7.93	0.03	0.10**	0.45***	0.30***	0.54***	0.45***

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6
1.性别
2.年龄
3.科技干扰	25.83	8.00	0.01	0.07*
4.环境敏感性	63.16	10.75	0.06*	0.06	0.37***
5.无手机恐惧	67.91	20.51	0.06*	0.11**	0.36***	0.35***
6.社会比较倾向	35.72	5.85	−0.01	0.10**	0.39***	0.39***	0.40***
7.手机冷落行为	31.37	7.93	0.03	0.10**	0.45***	0.30***	0.54***	0.45***

预测变量	无手机恐惧 (model 4)		手机冷落行为 (model 4)		无手机恐惧 (model 22)		手机冷落行为 (model 22)
预测变量	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t
性别	0.23	5.11***	−0.02	−0.74	0.21	5.07***	−0.01	−0.03
年龄	0.02	1.01	0.04	3.55**	0.01	0.64	0.03	2.66**
科技干扰	0.35	15.00***	0.29	12.14***	0.26	11.86***	0.23	11.75***
环境敏感性					0.27	12.17***	−0.02	−0.81
科技干扰×环境敏感性					0.08	4.40***	−0.02	−1.59
无手机恐惧			0.44	18.77***			0.38	19.09***
社会比较倾向							0.22	10.75***
无手机恐惧×社会比较倾向							0.07	4.74***
R²	0.14		0.37		0.20		0.41
F	90.46***		240.62***		99.77***		172.70***

预测变量	无手机恐惧 (model 4)		手机冷落行为 (model 4)		无手机恐惧 (model 22)		手机冷落行为 (model 22)
预测变量	β	t	β	t	β	t	β	t
性别	0.23	5.11***	−0.02	−0.74	0.21	5.07***	−0.01	−0.03
年龄	0.02	1.01	0.04	3.55**	0.01	0.64	0.03	2.66**
科技干扰	0.35	15.00***	0.29	12.14***	0.26	11.86***	0.23	11.75***
环境敏感性					0.27	12.17***	−0.02	−0.81
科技干扰×环境敏感性					0.08	4.40***	−0.02	−1.59
无手机恐惧			0.44	18.77***			0.38	19.09***
社会比较倾向							0.22	10.75***
无手机恐惧×社会比较倾向							0.07	4.74***
R²	0.14		0.37		0.20		0.41
F	90.46***		240.62***		99.77***		172.70***

[1]	孔繁昌, 王美茹, 孙乙元, 夏宇娟, 李晓瑶. 父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.
[2]	刘拓, 古丽给娜, 杨莹, 任世秀, 钞淼. 人格与无手机恐惧的关系：独处行为的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 268-274.