语言与儿童心理理论关系的一种新观点

心理与行为研究 ›› 2005, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1): 76-80.

• 论文 • 上一篇

语言与儿童心理理论关系的一种新观点

崔云,李红

上海市嘉定区教师进修学院,上海 201800; 西南师范大学心理学院,重庆 400715

收稿日期:2003-07-08 出版日期:2005-03-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
通讯作者: 李红,男,西南师范大学心理学院教授,博士生导师。Email：lihong1@swnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:崔云,女,上海市嘉定区教师进修学院科研员。
基金资助:
本文得到国家自然科学基金30370488项目的资助

A NEW VIEW ABOUT THE RELATION BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND CHILDREN′S THEORY-OF-MIND

Cui Yun,Li Hong

Jiading District Teacher′s Refresher Institute of Shanghai, Shanghai 201800; School of Psychology South-West China Normal University, Chongqing 400715

Received:2003-07-08 Online:2005-03-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 语言与心理理论的关系是儿童研究领域的研究者们长期探讨的话题,大量的实验结果表明二者的确存在密切的关系,但具体机制尚未弄清。该文介绍了探讨二者关系的一种新思路,即把心理理论重铸为对认知灵活性的测量,来考察语言在心理理论中的作用。文中介绍了语言的标签效应对认知灵活性影响的实验证据,并预期了在心理理论任务中使用语言标签可能出现的结果。

关键词: 语言, 心理理论, 标签, 认知灵活性, 灵活性项目选择任务

Abstract: The relation between language and theory of mind(ToM)has been a long-term topic in child research domain. Plenty of experiment results have revealed that there is surely a link between language and ToM, but what makes it has still been left unknown. This paper introduced a new idea about the link that measures of ToM was recast as measures of cognitive flexibility to examine the roles of language in the development of ToM. This paper provided experimental evidence for a causal effect of labeling on cognitive flexibility and predicted possible results caused by labeling in ToM tasks.

Key words: language, theory of mind, labeling, cognitive flexibility, flexible item selection task

中图分类号:

B844.1

崔云,李红. 语言与儿童心理理论关系的一种新观点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2005, 3(1): 76-80.

Cui Yun,Li Hong. A NEW VIEW ABOUT THE RELATION BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND CHILDREN′S THEORY-OF-MIND[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2005, 3(1): 76-80.

参考文献

[1] Astington J W. The future of theory of mind research: understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences. Child Development, 2001, 72: 685~688
[2] Dunn J, Brown J, Slomkowski C, et al. Young children′s understanding of other people′s feelings and beliefs: Individuals differences and their antecedents. Child Development. 1991, 62: 1352~1366
[3] Jenkins J M, Astington J W. Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32: 70~78
[4] Astington J W, Jenkins J M. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35: 1311~1320
[5] 隋晓爽, 苏彦捷. 对心理理论两成分认知模型的验证. 心理学报, 2003, 35(1): 56~62
[6] Jacques S, Zelazo P D. The role of language in the development of cognitive flexibility: Implications for cognitive and social processes. Chapter in preparation for publication in Homer B. & Tamis-Lemonda C. (Eds.), The development of social understanding and communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2002
[7] Zelazo P D. Language, levels of consciousness, and the development of intentional action. In: Zelazo P D, Astington J W, & Olson D R, (Eds.), Developing theories of intention: Social understanding and self-control. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1999: 95~117
[8] Loewenstein J, Gentner D. Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Manuscript under review. 2002
[9] Jacques S, Zelazo P D. The Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST): A measure of executive function in preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2001, 20: 573~591
[10] Jacques S, Zelazo P D, Lourenco S F, et al. Age- and language-related changes in preschoolers′ performance on the Flexible Item Selection Task: The roles of labeling and abstraction in the development of cognitive flexibility. Manuscript in preparation. 2002
[11] Wellman H M, Bartsch K. Young children′s reasoning about beliefs. Cognition, 1988, 30: 239~277
[12] Carlson S M, Moses L J. Individual differences in inhibitory control and children′s theory of mind. Child Development, 2001, 72: 1032~1053

[1]	张环, 左天然, 姜维, 裴铃茹, 吴瑕. 教师的语言形式对儿童语言理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 59-64.
[2]	张笛, 赵微, 李莉, 高桂丽. 早期词意识测量及其对阅读的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 771-778.
[3]	张霄钰, 朱海燕, 陈凤姣, 苏欣悦. 月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.
[4]	张莉. 儿童执行功能与早期学业能力的关系：学习品质的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 52-58.
[5]	齐冰, 李秋莹, 李雨薇, 宋耀武. 认知越灵活，句子理解越快?[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 577-582.
[6]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 偏侧化颜色范畴知觉不依赖于语言?[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 583-589.
[7]	肖凤, 丁宁, 郭晶晶. 语义通达对语言标识效应产生的必要作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 318-324.
[8]	刘月月, 王瑞明, 李利, 吴礼沐. 非平衡中-英双语者言语产生中非目标语言的语音激活[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 39-44.
[9]	曾天德, 李杰, 陈顺森. 心理理论对城区流动儿童心理社会能力的影响机制：双中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 846-853.
[10]	王婷, 王丹, 张积家. 双语与双言影响心理理论内隐系统与外显系统的分离[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 442-451.
[11]	李泉, 廖丽莉, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 执行功能对4岁幼儿情绪胜任力的影响：语言的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 340-347.
[12]	陈宝国, 张媛玥, 马腾飞. 高限制性句子语境条件下词汇接触次数和二语熟练度对词汇习得的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 153-159.
[13]	李泉, 宋武, 廉彬, 冯廷勇. 语言影响4~6岁彝、白、纳西族儿童延迟满足能力发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 657-664.
[14]	路瑶, 张颖颖, 陈宝国. 主动性控制在语言转换线索加工阶段的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 37-44.
[15]	陈友庆. 聋童与正常儿童对假装表征、模仿性假装和欺骗性假装的认识[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 66-73.

语言与儿童心理理论关系的一种新观点

A NEW VIEW ABOUT THE RELATION BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND CHILDREN′S THEORY-OF-MIND

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价