母亲处理冲突方式与儿童心理理论发展的关系

心理与行为研究 ›› 2008, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4): 248-254.

母亲处理冲突方式与儿童心理理论发展的关系

刘俊升^1,2,周颖³,桑标⁴

1上海师范大学应用心理系,上海 200234;
2上海师范大学儿童发展与家庭研究中心,上海 200234;
3中国浦东干部学院,上海 201204;
4华东师范大学心理学系,上海 200062

收稿日期:2007-06-20 出版日期:2008-12-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:刘俊升,男,上海师范大学教育学院应用心理系讲师,博士。Email: Jasonliu@yeah.net。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然基金30000055项目和上海市教育发展基金会“晨光计划”的资助

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTHER′S CONFLICT DEALING STYLE AND CHILDREN′S THEORY OF MIND

Liu Junsheng^1,2,Zhou Ying³,Sang Biao⁴

1 Department of Applied Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234;
2 Center of Child Development and Family Studies, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234;
3 China Executive Leadership Academy. Pudong, Shanghai 01204;
4 Department of Psychology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062

Received:2007-06-20 Online:2008-12-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以52名3~5岁幼儿为被试,考查了母亲处理亲子冲突的方式与儿童心理理论发展水平之间的关系。研究结果表明,不同性别和年龄阶段儿童的母亲,其处理亲子冲突的方式有所差异,隔离处理方式与儿童在心理理论任务上的得分存在显著的正相关。文章从冲突表征呈现的角度对上述结果进行了分析讨论。

关键词: 心理理论, 冲突处理方式, 冲突表征

Abstract: The present study was to explore the possible relationship between pre-schoolers′ theory of mind and mother′s conflict dealing style. 52 3-5-year-old children were involved in this study. The results indicated that age and gender had main effects on mother′s conflict dealing style. There was a positive correlation between children′s theory of mind and the time out treatment.

Key words: theory of mind, conflict dealing style, conflictive representation

中图分类号:

B844.1

刘俊升,周颖,桑标. 母亲处理冲突方式与儿童心理理论发展的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(4): 248-254.

Liu Junsheng,Zhou Ying,Sang Biao. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTHER′S CONFLICT DEALING STYLE AND CHILDREN′S THEORY OF MIND[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2008, 6(4): 248-254.

参考文献

[1] Astington J W. Theory of mind goes to school. Educational Leadership, 1998, 11: 46-49
[2] 邓赐平. 幼儿心理理论的发展及其表征机制的研究. 华东师范大学博士论文, 2001
[3] 陈英和, 姚端维, 郭向和. 儿童心理理论的发展及其影响因素的研究进展. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(3): 56-59
[4] Perner J, Ruffman T, Leekam S. Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 1994, 65: 1228-1238
[5] Jenkins M, Astington W. Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32: 70-78
[6] Ruffman T, Perner J, Naito M, et al. Older(but not younger)siblings facilitate false belief understanging. Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34: 161~174
[7] Jenkins J M, Astington J W. Cognitive, linguistic, and social factors associated with theory of mind development in young children// Astington J W. Individual differences in developing theories of mind. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1993
[8] Cutting L, Dunn J. Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 1999, 70: 853-865
[9] Dunn J, Brown J, Slomkowski C, et al. Young children′s understanding of other people′s feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 1991, 62: 1352-1366
[10] Mark A. Maureen A. Callanan. Metarepresentation in Action: 3-, 4-, and 5-year-child conversations. Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34: 491-502
[11] Welch-Ross M K. Mother-children participation in conversation about the past: Relationships′ to theory mind. Developmental Psychology, 1997, 33(4): 618-629
[12] Jenkins J M, Astington J W. Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32(1): 70-78
[13] Brown J R, Donelan-McCall N, Dunn J. Why talk about mental states? The significance of children′s conversations with friends, siblings and mothers. Child Development, 1996, 67: 836-849
[14] Collins W A, Luebker C. Parent and adolescent expectancies: Individual and relational significance// Smetana J F, Beliefs about parenting: Origins and developmental consequence. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1995
[15] Tronick E Z. Emotions and emotional communication in infants.Children and their development: Knowledge base, research agenda, and social application[Special issue]. American Psychologist, 1989, 44: 112-119
[16] Dunn J. The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988
[17] Perner J, Leekam S R, Wimmer H. Three-year-olds′ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1987, 5: 125-135
[18] Wimmer H, Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children′s understanding of deception. Cognition, 1983, 13: 103-128
[19] Gopnik A, Astingtion J. Children′s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 1988, 59: 26-37
[20] Carlson S M, Moses L J. Individual difference in inhibitory control and children′s theory of mind. Child Development, 2001, 72(4): 1032-1053
[21] Astington J, Jenkins J M. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35: 1311-1320
[22] Dalke D E. Explaining young children′s difficulty on the false belief task: Representational deficits or context sensitive knowledge? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1995, 13: 209-222
[23] 方晓义, 张锦涛, 孙莉, 刘钊. 亲子冲突与青少年社会适应的关系. 应用心理学, 2003, 9(4): 14-21