汉字记忆中错误联接的码相加效应

心理与行为研究 ›› 2009, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (3): 213-218.

汉字记忆中错误联接的码相加效应

王红椿¹,刘鸣²,张积家²

1 惠州学院,惠州 516015;
2 华南师范大学心理学系,广州 510631

收稿日期:2008-09-23 出版日期:2009-09-20 发布日期:2015-01-21
作者简介:王红椿,女,广东省惠州学院心理健康教育与咨询中心讲师,心理学博士。Email: wanda200309@163.com。刘鸣,男,华南师范大学教育科学学院教授,博士生导师。

THE EFFECT OF CODE ADDITIVITY ON MEMORY CONJUNCTION ERRORS OF CHINESE CHARACTERS

Wang Hongchun¹,Liu Ming²,Zhang Jijia²

1 Psychological Advisory Center, Huizhou University, Huizhou 501015;
2 Department of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631

Received:2008-09-23 Online:2009-09-20 Published:2015-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用错误联接的实验范式考察汉字记忆中的码相加效应。实验1采用形码加义码,结果发现对义似形似组的特征诱字错误再认率显著高于义异形似组的。实验2采用形码加音码,结果发现对音似形似组的诱字的错误再认率显著高于音异形似组的。研究表明汉语记忆中的错误联接存在码相加效应。研究结果可用激活混淆来源理论解释。

关键词: 错误联结, 特征诱字, 码相加效应, SAC模型

Abstract: The memory conjunction errors were examined by using Chinese Characters. Experiment 1 took the form of the orthographic code and semantic code, and experiment 2 took the form of the orthographic code and phonological code. The results showed that there was significant increase in the false alarm to the lures, which proved that there was code additivity in the memory conjunction errors. The result could be explained by source of activation confusion(SAC)model. In addition to the concept nodes, there was a features and feature associations node bound to the episode node. False memory could be the reason of the familiarity producing by the activation of the feature and feature association nodes because of the resemblance of the orthographic, phonological or semantic code. The more resemblance between the lures and the primes, the more familiarity will occur, resulting in the higher false alarm to the lures.

Key words: memory conjunction errors, feature lures, Code additivity, SAC model

中图分类号:

B842.3

王红椿,刘鸣,张积家. 汉字记忆中错误联接的码相加效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(3): 213-218.

Wang Hongchun,Liu Ming,Zhang Jijia. THE EFFECT OF CODE ADDITIVITY ON MEMORY CONJUNCTION ERRORS OF CHINESE CHARACTERS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(3): 213-218.

参考文献

[1] Reinitz M T, Lammers W C, Cochran B P. Memory conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory. Memory and Cognition, 1992, 20(1): 1-11
[2] Kroll N E A, Knight R T, Metcalfe J, et al. Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 1996, 35(2): 176-196
[3] Jones T C, Jacoby L L. Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 2001, 45(1): 82-102
[4] Reinitz M T. Effects of simultaneous stimulus presentation and attention switching on memory conjunction errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 2000, 44(2): 206-219
[5] Jones T C, Jacoby L L. conjunction errors in recognition memory: Modality-free errors for older adults but not for young adults. Acta Psychologica, 2005, 120(1): 53-73
[6] Reder L M, Nhouyvanisvong A, Schunn C D, et al. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgements in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26(2): 294-320
[7] 喻柏林. 汉语语词码相加效应的实验研究（一）. 心理学报, 1986, (1): 50-58
[8] 喻柏林. 汉语语词码相加效应的实验研究（二）. 心理学报, 1986, (3): 281-285
[9] Diana R A, Reder L M. The low frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 2006, 34(4): 805-815
[10] Reder L M, Paynter C, Diana R A. et al. Experience is a double-edged sword: A computational model of the encoding/retrieval tradeoff with familiarity// Ross B, Benjamin A S. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Academic Press, 2008
[11] Pesta B J, Sanders R E, Murphy M D. Misguided multiplication. Creating false memories with numbers rather than words. Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29(3): 478-483
[12] Diana R, Peterson M J, Reder L M. The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004, 11(1): 150-156
[13] Sluzenski J, Newcombe N S, Kovacs S L. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 2006, 32(1): 89-90
[14] Reinitz M T, Hannigan S L. False memories for compound words: Role of working memory. Memory and Cognition, 2004, 32(3): 463-473

[1]	赵敏芳, 傅小兰, 李开云, Hubert D. Zimmer. 动作操作与怪异性对联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 145-152.
[2]	贾绪计, 李雅倩, 蔡林, 王庆瑾, 林琳. 自我妨碍与学习投入的关系：学业浮力的中介作用和父母支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 227-233.
[3]	干加裙, 张曼曼, 胡锦慧, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.
[4]	李士一, 周日, 孙璐, 谢岩枫, 赵光. 三维场景中内隐记忆的空间更新[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 736-742.
[5]	杨丽娴, 李铃芳, 张锦坤. 妒忌情绪下的定向遗忘效应：基于情境模拟诱发[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 311-317.
[6]	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 小学生能力观对数学学习投入的影响：学业控制感和期望的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 490-496.
[7]	胡炜宇, 齐冰. 提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.
[8]	宋耀武, 王润洲, 刘昌昊, 赵小军. 有意遗忘与自我参照：基于储存—提取模型的新方法[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 1-12.
[9]	周铁民, 林雪. 不同次级任务对序列学习的影响及年级差异^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 462-469.
[10]	李士一, 白学军, 王雨薇, 郑蕾, 孙弘进. 二维场景旋转下的背景提示效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 289-294.
[11]	龚少英, 张盼盼, 上官晨雨. 学习者控制和任务难度对多媒体学习的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 335-342.
[12]	雷玉菊, 张冬静, 牛更枫, 胡祥恩,. 网络学习中学习者个人特征对学习投入的影响：一个有调节的中介效应模型*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 181-188.
[13]	潘运, 罗叶双, 王馨, 赵守盈,. 视觉选择性注意对注意缺损多动障碍儿童数字距离效应的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 41-48.
[14]	苏娟, 白学军, 王超, 阴国恩,. 比较视觉搜索任务中工作记忆最小化的眼动研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 49-53.
[15]	郭丰波, 韦义平, 高宇, 王益文,. 背景任务对前瞻记忆策略加工的影响：一项ERPs研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 75-82.