群集化儿童问题行为核查表的中文版修订

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将Frick等人的群集化儿童问题行为核查表（the clustering child behaviors checklist,CCBCL）修订为中文版自我报告问卷、教师评定问卷和同伴评定问卷。以529名初一学生为被试进行问卷修订。结果发现：Frick等人提出的外化问题行为框架适合研究中国儿童青少年的外化问题行为,探索性因子分析证明中文版问卷的因子结构与原文卷一致;自我报告、教师评定和同伴评定版问卷的内部一致性系数、分半系数和重测信度系数都在可接受的范围内,且自我报告版问卷中财物损害的各信度系数较低;自我报告结果与同伴拒绝的相关不显著,而教师评定和同伴评定的结果均与同伴拒绝相关显著;同伴评定问卷的各信度系数及通过其获得的测量结果与同伴拒绝的相关性均高于其它两种问卷。

关键词: 外化问题行为, 中文版, 多主体, 信度, 效度

Abstract: This study modified the Clustering Child Behavior Checklist by Frick et al into Chinese adolescents-self report questionnaire, teacher rating questionnaire, and peer rating questionnaire, so that researchers can directly explore children′s externalizing behaviors and multi-informants assessment. The subjects are 529 junior students from Jinan city and Weifang area. The results indicated that the framework of Frick et al. constructed was suitable to Chinese adolescents; the cronbach′s coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability of the three kinds of questionnaires can be accepted in this research; adolescents′ externalizing behaviors based on self-report were not relative to their peer rejection significantly, however, the same behaviors based on teacher rating or peer rating were relative to their peer rejection significantly; and peer rating questionnaire had the highest all reliability coefficients and the related coefficient to peer rejection among the three kinds of modified questionnaire.

Key words: externalizing behavior, Chinese version, multiple informants, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

B844.1

陈光辉,徐夫真,李景,张文新. 群集化儿童问题行为核查表的中文版修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 7(3): 219-225.

Chen Guanghui,Xu Fuzhen,Li Jing,Zhang Wenxin. THE CHINESE VERSION OF THE CLUSTERING CHILD BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2009, 7(3): 219-225.

参考文献

[1] Ladd G W, Profilet S M. The Child Behavior Scale: A teacher-report measure of young children′s aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32(6): 1008-1024
[2] Moffitt T E, Caspi A, Harrington H, et al. Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 2002, 14(1): 179-207
[3] Liu J. Childhood externalizing behavior: Theory and implications. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 2004, 17(3): 93-103
[4] Frick P J, Lahey B B, Loeber R, et al. Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: a meta-analytic review of factor analyses and cross-validation in a clinic sample. Clinical Psychology Review, 1993, 13(4): 319-340
[5] Tremblay R E. The development of aggressive behavior during childhood: What have we learned in the past century? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2000, 24(2): 129-141
[6] Achenbach T M. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Child Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, 1991
[7] Achenbach T M, McConaughy S H, Howell C T. Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implication of cross informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 1987, 101(2): 213-232
[8] Goyette C H, Conners C K, Ulrich R F. Normative data on revised conners parent and teacher rating scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1978, 6(2): 221-236
[9] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. 1994
[10] Achenbach T M. Manual for the Youth Self-report and 1991 Child Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont. 1991
[11] Loeber R, Green S M, Lahey B B. Mental health professionals′ perception of the utility of children, mothers, and teachers as informants on childhood psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 1990, 19(2): 136-143
[12] Smith P K. Bullying: Recent developments. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2004, 9(3): 98-103
[13] Butovskaya M L, Timentschik V M, Burkova V N. Aggression, conflict resolution, popularity, and attitude to school in Russian adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 2007, 33(2): 170-183
[14] Bongers I L, Koot H M, van der Ende J, et al. Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 2004, 75(5): 1523-1537
[15] 庞丽娟. 同伴提名法与幼儿同伴交往研究. 心理发展与教育, 1994, 10(1): 18-21
[16] 王美芳, 张文新. 中小学中欺负者、受欺负者和欺负—受欺负者的同伴关系研究. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 1-6
[17] van Lier P A C, Viraro F, Wanner B, et al. Gender differences in developmental links among antisocial behavior, friends′ antisocial behavior, and peer rejection in childhood: results from two cultures. Child Development, 2005, 76(4): 841-855
[18] 崔丽娟. 青少年网络成瘾的界定、特性与预防研究. 华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2005
[19] 张文新. 青少年发展心理学. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2002
[20] Windle M A. Study of friendship characteristics and problem behaviors among middle adolescents. Child Development, 1994, 65(6): 1764-1777
[21] Parker J G, Asher S R. Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 1993, 29(4): 611-621