心理与行为研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2011, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 8-15.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

Eye Movements and Memory for Objects and Their Locations

Simon P. Liversedge1,Katie L. Meadmore1,David Corck-Adelman1,Shui-I Shih1,Alexander Pollatsek2   

  1. 1 University of Southampton;
    2 University of Massachusetts
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-06 出版日期:2011-03-20 发布日期:2011-03-20

Eye Movements and Memory for Objects and Their Locations

Simon P. Liversedge1,Katie L. Meadmore1,David Corck-Adelman1,Shui-I Shih1,Alexander Pollatsek2   

  1. 1 University of Southampton;
    2 University of Massachusetts
  • Received:2010-11-06 Online:2011-03-20 Published:2011-03-20
  • Contact: Simon P. Liversedge, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ. Email: s.p.livesedge@soton.ac.uk, Tel: +44 23 8059 9399
  • Supported by:
    This research was supported by a UK Economic and Social Research Council research studentship to David Corck-Adelman and a UK Economic and Social Research Council research grant(RES-000-22-3398)to Simon Liversedge

PDF (PC)

摘要： In this paper we briefly describe preliminary data from two experiments that we have carried out to investigate the relationship between visual encoding and memory for objects and their locations within scenes. In these experiments, we recorded participants′ eye movements as they viewed a photograph of a cubicle with 12 objects positioned pseudo-randomly on a desk and shelves. After viewing the photograph, participants were taken to the actual cubicle where they undertook two memory tests. Participants were asked to identify the 12 target objects(from the photograph)presented amongst 12 distractors. They were then required to place each of the objects in the location that they occupied in the photograph. These tests assessed participants′ memory for identity of the objects and their locations. In Experiment 1, we assessed the influence of the encoding period and the test delay on object identity and location memory. In Experiment 2 we manipulated scanning behaviour during encoding by “boxing”some of the objects in the photo. We showed that using boxes to change eye movement behaviour during encoding directly affected the nature of memory for the scene. The results of these studies indicate a fundamental relationship between visual encoding and memory for objects and their locations. We explain our findings in terms of the Visual Memory Model(Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002).

Abstract: In this paper we briefly describe preliminary data from two experiments that we have carried out to investigate the relationship between visual encoding and memory for objects and their locations within scenes. In these experiments, we recorded participants′ eye movements as they viewed a photograph of a cubicle with 12 objects positioned pseudo-randomly on a desk and shelves. After viewing the photograph, participants were taken to the actual cubicle where they undertook two memory tests. Participants were asked to identify the 12 target objects(from the photograph)presented amongst 12 distractors. They were then required to place each of the objects in the location that they occupied in the photograph. These tests assessed participants′ memory for identity of the objects and their locations. In Experiment 1, we assessed the influence of the encoding period and the test delay on object identity and location memory. In Experiment 2 we manipulated scanning behaviour during encoding by “boxing”some of the objects in the photo. We showed that using boxes to change eye movement behaviour during encoding directly affected the nature of memory for the scene. The results of these studies indicate a fundamental relationship between visual encoding and memory for objects and their locations. We explain our findings in terms of the Visual Memory Model(Hollingworth & Henderson, 2002).