大学生环境价值观与亲环境行为:环境关心的中介作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 780-785.

大学生环境价值观与亲环境行为:环境关心的中介作用

刘贤伟, 吴建平

北京航空航天大学公共管理学院,高等教育研究所,北京 100191;北京林业大学人文社会科学学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2012-12-03 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
作者简介:刘贤伟,男,北京航空航天大学公共管理学院博士生。E-mail:liuxianwei@hss.buaa.edu.cn。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家林业公益性行业科研专项经费(编号:200804003)以及北京市哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目“绿色北京建设研究”(09ZDA04)的资助。

Environmental Values and Pro-environmental Behaviors of College Students:Mediating Role of Environmental Concern

Liu Xianwei¹, Wu Jianping²

1 School of Public Administration, Beihang University, Institute of Higher Education, Beijing 100191;
2 School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing 100083

Received:2012-12-03 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用问卷法调查了北京和内蒙古三所高校的1034名大学生,检验了大学生环境关心、环境价值观和亲环境行为的关系,并考察了环境关心在环境价值观和亲环境行为之间的中介作用。结果表明:(1)女性大学生被试环境关心水平显著高于男性大学生被试;蒙古族大学生被试环境关心水平显著高于汉族和其他民族大学生被试。(2)利他价值观和利己价值观对两类亲环境行为的直接效应显著;环境关心在利己价值观和私领域亲环境行为之间起到部分中介作用,在生态圈价值观和私领域亲环境行为之间起到完全中介作用。

关键词: 大学生, 环境价值观, 亲环境行为, 环境关心, 中介作用

Abstract: Methods of questionnaires were employed to investigate 1034 college students in Beijing and Inner Mongolia. The relationship among environmental concern, environmental values and pro-environmental behaviors and the mediator effect of environmental concern were examined. The results indicated that: (1) The level of female students’environmental concern was significantly higher than that of male students. Mongolian students showed higher level of environmental concern than Han and the current minority nationality participants (2) Altruistic and egoistic influenced two types of pro-environmental behaviors directly. Environmental concern played a completely mediating role in the relation between biospheric value and private behavior and a partial mediating role in the relation between egoistic value andprivate behavior.

Key words: college students, environmental values, pro-environmental behaviors, environmental concern, mediating effect.

中图分类号:

B849

刘贤伟, 吴建平. 大学生环境价值观与亲环境行为:环境关心的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 780-785.

Liu Xianwei, Wu Jianping. Environmental Values and Pro-environmental Behaviors of College Students:Mediating Role of Environmental Concern[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 780-785.

参考文献

包斯古日楞. (2009) . 蒙古族的自然崇拜及其生态价值. 内蒙古农业大学学报 (社会科学版) , 11, 199-200.
龚文娟. (2008) . 当代城市居民环境友好行为之性别差异分析. 中国地质大学学报 (社会科学版) , 8, 37-42.
侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004) . 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 42-42.
邱皓政, 林碧芳. (2009) . 结构方程模型的原理与应用. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社. 263-288.
许黔宜. (2008) . 价值取向及能源消费态度间环境永续认知关系研究. 台湾国立成功大学硕士学位论文.
吴建平, 訾非, 刘贤伟. (2012) . 新生态范式的测量: NEP量表在中国的修订及应用. 北京林业大学学报 (社科版) , 4, 8-13.
Buttel, F. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology.Annual Review of Sociology, 465-488.
Choi, M. S., & Kim, Y. (2005). Antecedents of green purchasebehavior: An examination of collectivism, environmentalconcern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1),592-599.
De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explainbeliefs related to environmental significant behavior how tomeasure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000).New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Grling, T., Fujii, S., G.rling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 1-9.
Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & G.rling, T. (2008). Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy, 36(2), 768-774.
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677-694.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173.
McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,20(1), 93-104.
Schultz , P. W. , & Zelezny, L . C . (1 9 9 8) . Values and Proenvironmental Behavior A Five-Country Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540-558.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255-265.
Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457-475.
Wesley, S. P. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1),1-65.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4),9-45.
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425.
Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999).A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements:The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2),81-98.
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
Tan, B. C. (2011). The roles of knowledge, threat, and PCE on green purchase behaviour. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 14.

[1]	李甜甜, 徐鹤文. 大学生自我概念清晰性与社交焦虑的关系：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 700-706.
[2]	郝喜玲, 陈煊, 刘依冉. 失败恐惧对大学生失败学习的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 707-713.
[3]	刘建榕, 谢林君, 郑琳. 社会性发展迟滞大学生的情绪韵律识别特点[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 714-720.
[4]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[5]	尹静, 李传英, 马世超, 徐瑜姣, 李永升. 大学生人格与手机依赖的关系：压力感知的中介与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 426-432.
[6]	姜琨, 兰泽波, 孙晓铜, 丁晓辉, 陶佳雨. 听障大学生社会支持对学业自我效能感的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 96-100.
[7]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[8]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[9]	朱莹莹, 马晓晴, 唐卓仪, 杨敏齐. 睡眠类型对大学生抑郁的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 657-664,694.
[10]	彭顺, 胡祥恩. 大学生压力与疲劳的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 563-570.
[11]	陈佩儀, 陈瑜, 杨雪岭. 中庸思维对大学生抑郁症状的影响机制：消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 571-576.
[12]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[13]	闫广芬, 姜琨, 兰泽波, 丁晓辉. 听障大学生社会支持对适应的影响：心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 252-257.
[14]	纪凌开, 刘华山, 李晨璐. 温水煮青蛙：专业认同对大学生抑郁的影响机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 833-838.
[15]	王晓诚, 贾丽娜, 金元英. 家庭社会经济地位对初中生阅读成就的影响：阅读动机和阅读活动的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 839-845.