领导不当督导与追随者规范承诺:追随力的中介作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 796-800.

领导不当督导与追随者规范承诺:追随力的中介作用

丁桂凤, 张澎涛

河南大学心理与行为研究所,开封 475004

收稿日期:2013-08-27 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
作者简介:丁桂凤,女,河南大学心理与行为研究所教授,博士。E-mail:dgf11@sina.com
基金资助:
本研究得到国家自然基金面上项目(71171073)的资助。

Abusive Supervision and Normative Commitment: The Mediation Effects of Followership

Ding Guifeng, Zhang Pengtao

Institute of Psychology & Behavior, He'nan University, Kaifeng 475004

Received:2013-08-27 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用不当督导量表、追随力量表及规范承诺量表对700名企事业单位员工进行调查,考查追随力在领导不当督导与员工追随者规范承诺之间的中介作用。结果发现:(1)不当督导对规范承诺具有显著的负向预测作用;(2)个体的追随力水平能够显著正向预测规范承诺;(3)追随力在不当督导与规范承诺之间起完全中介作用。

关键词: 不当督导, 追随力, 规范承诺

Abstract: This research aimed to explore the relationship between abusive supervision perceived by followers and followers’ normative commitment, examining the mediation effects of followership between abusive supervision and normative commitment. 700 employees from enterprises and institutions were completed the questionnaires of abusive supervision, followership and normative commitment. The results showed that abusive supervision significantly and negatively predicted normative commitment; Followership significantly and positively predicted normative commitment; Followership fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and normative commitment.

Key words: abusive supervision, followership, normative commitment.

中图分类号:

B849

丁桂凤, 张澎涛. 领导不当督导与追随者规范承诺:追随力的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 796-800.

Ding Guifeng, Zhang Pengtao. Abusive Supervision and Normative Commitment: The Mediation Effects of Followership[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(6): 796-800.

参考文献

王琐. (2011).追随的内容结构及绩效的关系研究. 硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学.
李锐,凌文辁,柳士顺.(2009).上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制.心理学报, 41(12), 1189-1202
申传刚,马红宇.杨璟,刘腾飞. (2012). 上司不当督导与下属绩效:反馈寻求行为和学习目标的定向作用. 心理学报, 44(12), 1677-1686.
原涛,凌文辁.(2010). 追随力研究述评与展望.心理科学进展,18(5),769-780.
原涛.(2011). 追随特质模型及追随动机与相关变量的关系研究. 硕士学位论文.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer. J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization :An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49,252-276.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
Bjugstad , K ,Thach, E. C.,Thompson,K. J.,& Morris, A .(2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership style. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management,5,304-319.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion (2th Ed.). The Leadership Quarterly,17, 317-334.
.Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking followership: A post-structuralist analysis of follower identities. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 179-189.
Gilbert, J., & Matviuk, S. (2008). The symbiotic nature of the leader-follower relationship and its impact on organizational effectiveness. Academic Leadership, 6(4),16.
Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B.(2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review,30, 96-112.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner B. Z.(2003). Follower oriented leadership. Rrtriveved June 20, 2009, fromhttp://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=73214.
Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Landino, R. J. (2006). Followership: A literature review of arising power beyond leadership (pp.1-23). England: DeMontfort. University.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization.Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
Paddia ,A. Hogan,R..,& Kaiser,R.B.(2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly,18,176-194.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261-289.
Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A.,& Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 721-732.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076.