权力感的无意识启动:方法研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 315-320.

权力感的无意识启动:方法研究^*

云祥，李小平

南京森林警察学院，南京 210023
南京师范大学心理学院，南京 210097

收稿日期:2013-09-22 出版日期:2014-05-20 发布日期:2014-03-25
通讯作者: 李小平，男，南京师范大学心理学院教授。E-mail:xpli911@hotmail.com。
作者简介:云祥，男，南京森林警察学院讲师。
基金资助:
本文系教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJA840019)。

Nonconscious Priming of Feelings of Power: An Study on Methods

Yun Xiang¹,Li Xiaoping²

1 Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210046;
2 School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097

Received:2013-09-22 Online:2014-05-20 Published:2014-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情境性启动法是对权力感进行内隐社会认知研究的重要方法。本研究首先对权力情境性启动的两种启动方法(概念启动和定势启动)进行介绍，接着通过两个实验对两种启动方法在中文背景下的适用性和有效性进行了验证，认为中文材料的概念启动和定势启动是适用和有效的，可以作为国内权力社会认知研究中启动权力的方法。最后对权力概念启动和定势启动的研究范式、方法差异和内在机制进行了讨论。

关键词: 权力, 无意识启动, 情境性启动, 概念启动, 定势启动, 内隐社会认知

Abstract: Contextual priming is an important method in power researching from the perspective of implicit social cognitive. This article first describes the research techniques of two methods (contextual priming and mindset priming) of contextual priming, and then checks the applicability and validity of two methods in Chinese background by two experiments, and come to a conclusion that these two methods are applicable and valid , are possible to applied in power priming study in China. Finally, the paradigm, methods differences and mechanism of power conceptual priming and power mindset priming are discussed.

Key words: power, nonconscious priming, contextual priming, conceptual priming, mindset priming, implicit social cognitive

中图分类号:

B842.7

云祥，李小平. 权力感的无意识启动:方法研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 315-320.

Yun Xiang,Li Xiaoping. Nonconscious Priming of Feelings of Power: An Study on Methods[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(3): 315-320.

参考文献

李彦章, 张燕, 姜英, 李航, 米沙, 易光杰, 古洪勇, 姜原.(2008). 行为抑制/激活系统量表中文版的信效度分析.中国心理卫生杂志,22(8),613-616.
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D.(2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H.T. Reis and C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., & Barndollar, K.( 2001).The automated will: Nonconsicous activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
Bargh, J. A.(2007) Social psychological approaches to consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (eds), Then Cambridge companion ofconscience,(pp555-569).Cambridge University Pressed, Cambridge.
Bargh, J. A., & Morsella, E. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 73-79.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80,183-187.
Fiske, S. T. (1993).Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist,48, 621-628.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003).From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., &Gruenfeld, D.H.(2006).Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
Higgins, E.T., & Bargh, J.A. (1987). Social perception and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369-425.
Keltner, D. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C.(2003). Power, approach, andinhibition. Psychological Review, 110,265-284.
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558-564.
Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289.
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A. & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5),737-744.
Lee,F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Is it lonely at the top? The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23,43-91.
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision-making? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451-462.
Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W.(2010) Power, testosterone and risk-taking: The moderating influence of testosterone and executive functions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439-526.
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006).You focus on the forest when youre in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90,578-596.
Srull, T. K., & Jr. Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., Van der Lwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315-1322.
Wang, X. T.(1996). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60, 31-63.
Zhong, C. B., Magee, J., Maddux, W., & Galinsky, A.,(2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western Society, In Y. Chen (Ed.), (Research on Managing Groups and Teams:National Culture and Groups (Vol.9, pp. 53-73). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science Press.

[1]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[2]	贾磊, 陆家豪, 王逸, 张常洁. 权力概念隐喻映射中的冲突控制：特征与过程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 417-423.
[3]	云祥. 权力感对道德困境判断的影响：基于CNI模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 544-551.
[4]	赵申苒, 康萌萌, 王明辉, 彭翠. 仁慈领导对员工亲环境行为的影响：上下属关系与权力距离的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 819-826.
[5]	李宗波, 王明辉. 威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 713-719.
[6]	孙冬青, 傅鑫媛, 辛自强. 信任者权力对其人际信任的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 139-144.
[7]	徐悦, 段锦云, 李成艳. 仁慈领导对员工建言的影响：自我预防和自我提升的双重路径[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 839-845.
[8]	云祥, 李小平. 权力、任务框架对自我和为他人决策时风险偏好的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 417-423.
[9]	徐梦,李小平. 组织不公平与反生产行为的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 282-288.
[10]	李亚强,陈朝阳,苏永强,杨琳琳,杨勇. 权力对观点采择的影响：权力动机的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 399-405.
[11]	王垚, 李小平. 不同人际关系取向下的权力对利他行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 516-520.
[12]	李艾丽莎,；胡竹菁；张庆林4. 决策权力和社会角色对混合动机冲突决策的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 115-119.
[13]	焦璨, 张敏强, 吴利, 纪薇. 多元动机网格测验（MMG-S）中文版的修订报告[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(1): 49-53.