特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 577-582.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*

陈琳^1，，钟罗金³，李悠²，莫雷^2，

1 中山大学国际汉语学院,广州 510275
2 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631
3 华南师范大学基础教育培训与研究院,广州 510631

收稿日期:2013-08-02 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-12-19
通讯作者: 莫雷,男,华南师范大学心理应用研究中心教授,博士生导师。E-mail:molei@scnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:陈琳,女,中山大学国际汉语学院讲师,心理学博士。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC190005)和2011年广东高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划项目(wym11006)资助。

Feature Presentation on Category Perceptual Representation

Chen Lin¹, Zhong Luojin³, Li You³, Mo Lei²

1 School of Chinese as a Second Language, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China;
3 School of Professronal Development and Research on Primary and Secondary Educction, South China Normal Uniuersity, Guangzhou 510631, China

Received:2013-08-02 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 两个实验采用阻碍效应范式探讨了特征的呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响。研究结果发现在阻碍效应范式中,改变特征的呈现方式引发了不同的类别知觉表征方式；当固定样例特征的呈现位置时,引发了基于样例整体相似性的表征；而随机样例特征的呈现位置时,引发了基于样例特征的解析表征。该结果支持了类别学习的多系统理论。

关键词: 特征呈现, 知觉表征, 类别学习, 阻碍效应

Abstract: The effect of feature presentation on category perceptual representation was investigated in a blocking paradigm in which one defining dimension could perfectly classify all exemplars into two categories. In experiment 1, participants were assigned to learn two categories with features presented sequentially or randomly, which may require different working memory. However, the results showed that some nondefining features were learned regardless of the feature presentation. Experiment 2 fixed the defining feature on the top of each exemplar. A strong blocking was found in the sequential condition and none nondefining feature was learned. It indicated that sequential feature presentation induced overall similarity processing, whereas random feature presentation promoted analytic processing.

Key words: feature presentation, perceptual representation, category learning, blocking

中图分类号:

B842.2

陈琳，钟罗金，李悠，莫雷. 特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 577-582.

Chen Lin, Zhong Luojin, Li You, Mo Lei. Feature Presentation on Category Perceptual Representation[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 577-582.

参考文献

陈琳, 莫雷, 黄平, 郑允佳. (2012). 阻碍效应范式中主题知识对类别学习的影响. 心理科学, 35, 868-874.
陈琳, 莫雷, 徐贵平, 郑允佳. (2011). 阻碍效应的理论研究述评. 华东师范大学学报, 29, 39-46.
陈琳, 莫雷, 郑允佳. (2012). 类别感知对类别学习中额外特征学习的影响. 华南师范大学学报, 196, 57-62.
陈琳, 莫雷, 郑允佳, 王雨函. (2013). 类别学习的阻碍效应与双机制理论. 心理科学, 36, 356-363.
陈琳, 莫雷, 郑允佳, 钟罗金. (2013). 类别学习中的认知学习机制. 心理与行为研究, 11, 305-311.
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
Ashby, F. G., Ennis, J. M., & Spiering, B. J. (2007). A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychological Review, 114, 632-656. .
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2011). Human category learning 2.0. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1224, 147-161.
Ashby, F. G., & OBrien, J. B. (2005). Category learning and multiple memory systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 83-89.
Ashby, F. G., & Waldron, E. M. (2000). The neuropsychological bases of category learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 10-14.
Bott, L., Hoffman, A. B., & Murphy, G. L. (2007). Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 685-699.
Filoteo, J. V., Lauritzen, S., & Maddox, W. T. (2010). Removing the Frontal Lobes the Effects of Engaging Executive Functions on Perceptual Category Learning. Psychological Science, 21, 415-423.
Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
Grau, J. W., & Nelson, D. K. (1988). The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: Evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 347-370.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In R. M. Church, & B. A. Campbell (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1993). Processing integral dimensions: The whole view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1105-1113.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
Maddox, W. T., Love, B. C., Glass, B. D., & Filoteo, J. V. (2008). When more is less: Feedback effects in perceptual category learning. Cognition, 108, 578-589.
Milton, F. N., Wills, A. J., & Hodgson, T. L. (2009). The neural basis of overall similarity and single-dimension sorting. Neuroimage, 46, 319-326.
Seger, C. A. (2008). How do the basal ganglia contribute to categorization? Their role in generalization, response selection, and learning via feedback. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 265-278.
Seger, C. A., & Miller, E. K. (2010). Category learning in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 203-219.
Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., & Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition, 65, 167-196.
Ward, T. B. (1983). Response tempo and separable-integral responding: Evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 103-112.
Zeithamova, D., & Maddox, W. T. (2006). Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning. Memory & Cognition, 34, 387-398.

[1]	王家慰, 邓泳珊, 邢强. 学习顺序和材料相似性对听觉类别学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 750-755.
[2]	邢强, 孙海龙, 车敬上. 反馈效价影响家族相似性类别学习的ERPs研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 300-307.
[3]	孙红梅, 阴国恩, 陈雪莹. 不同类别学习策略下的中医诊断学习:以舌诊学习为例[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 728-731.
[4]	陈琳, 钟罗金, 郑允佳, 莫雷. 类别学习中的认知学习机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(3): 305-311.
[5]	刘亚军阴国恩杨会会. 观察式学习条件下类别维度与家族相似性类别学习[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 38-41.
[6]	宋娟吕勇. 类别表征与策略的脑科学研究及对思维教学的启示[J]. , 2008, 6(1): 75-80.

特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响^*

Feature Presentation on Category Perceptual Representation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价