心理距离对后悔的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 671-674.

心理距离对后悔的影响^*

段锦云，王雪鹏，古晓花

苏州大学教育学院心理系,苏州 215123

收稿日期:2013-12-24 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-12-19
作者简介:段锦云,男,苏州大学心理学系教授。E-mail:mgjyduan@hotmail.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71372180),教育部人文社科项目(09YJCZH087),江苏省青蓝工程优秀青年骨干教师项目。

The Influence of Psychological Distance on Regret

Duan Jinyun, Wang Xuepeng, Gu Xiaohua

Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123

Received:2013-12-24 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于解释水平理论,考察了心理距离的不同维度对后悔程度的影响。本研究从心理距离的四个维度展开,时间距离采用组内设计,空间距离、社会距离和概率维度采用单因素完全随机设计,312名被试随机分配至各个维度参与实验处理,检验不同心理距离是否调节着后悔程度,其中有效数据275份。结果表明:在时间距离、空间距离、社会距离、概率和假设性条件下,均出现决策时心理距离越近,对决策事件或客体的解释水平越低,随后在获得负性结果反馈时体验到的后悔就越强烈。由此可见,决策事件的心理距离越近,后悔程度越大。

关键词: 解释水平, 心理距离, 后悔

Abstract: Regret is a kind of cognitive emotion which occurs when the outcome will be better than it was if one made a different choice. Individuals interpretation to the situation affects judgment and decision making, sequentially affects the intensity of regret. Construal Level Theory (CLT) is a social cognitive theory which assumes that the psychological distance perceived from the objects or events can make people product different construal levels, and then influence judgment and decision making. The research based on the CLT explored how psychological distance influences individuals regret intensity. This study was operated from four dimensions of psychological distance (temporal, spatial and social distance, probability), and we surveyed 302 students from Soochow University and picked up 275 valid data. Every participant should finish one of the situational questionnaires randomly. The results showed that Individuals experience more regret under the near temporal, spatial, social distance and high possibility condition. Future study should confirm these findings by other methods of experiment and explore the other factors affecting the regret.

Key words: construal level theory, psychological distance, regret

中图分类号:

B849:C934

段锦云，王雪鹏，古晓花. 心理距离对后悔的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 671-674.

Duan Jinyun, Wang Xuepeng, Gu Xiaohua. The Influence of Psychological Distance on Regret[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 671-674.

参考文献

段锦云,朱月龙,陈婧.(2013).心理距离对风险决策框架效应的影响.心理科学,36(6),1404-1407.
钟毅平,陈海洪.(2013).心理距离对道德行为判断的影响.心理学探新, 33(1), 43-46.
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 11(6), 212-216.
Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.
Fiedler, K. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 101-106.
Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282.
Henderson, M. D., Trope, Y., & Carnevale, P. J. (2006). Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 712-729.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preference. Scientific American , 246(1), 136-142.
Kray, L. J. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143-149.
Morrison, M., & Roese, N. J. (2011). Regrets of the typical American: Findings from a nationally representative survey. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 576-583.
Shani, Y., Igou, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). Different ways of looking at unpleasant truths: How construal levels influence information search. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 36-44.
Shani, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). When and why do we want to know? How experienced regret promotes post-decision information search. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 207-222.
Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473-482.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 641-653.
Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93-106.

[1]	李开云, 王思杰, 杨蕙菁, 毕艳, 张文君, 林丰勋. “己之所欲”还是“成人之美”？解释水平视角下个体赠送-接受礼物的偏好不对称性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 136-144.
[2]	吴三美, 王敬欣, 何先友, 田良苏, 赵雪汝, 陈广耀. 心理距离概念水平上的趋利避害相容效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 488-495.
[3]	任玉冰, 杜秀芳. 心理距离与后果严重性对人身安全决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 327-334.
[4]	张克, 杜秀敏, 董晓飞. 社会动机与“自我-他人”对创造性表现的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 414-420.
[5]	王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.
[6]	王阳, 牟兵兵, 宛小昂. 空间距离与产品属性对消费者选择偏好的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 534-540.
[7]	王阳, 牟兵兵, 宛小昂. 空间距离与产品属性对消费者选择偏好的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 840-846.
[8]	张凤华；杨清；胡竹菁；罗嗣明；张庆林4. 自尊与模糊决策中的决策偏好[J]. , 2012, 10(6): 459-463.