重要他人情境对青少年意图判断诺布效应的影响*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (4): 471-478.

重要他人情境对青少年意图判断诺布效应的影响*

陈友庆, 陶君

河海大学公共管理学院应用心理学研究所，南京 210098南京财经学校学生工作部，南京 210001

收稿日期:2015-02-25 出版日期:2016-07-20 发布日期:2016-07-25
通讯作者: 陈友庆，E-mailclhcyq@126.com。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（12JJD190003）。

The Influences of the Significant Others in Adolescents′ Knobe Effect about Intentional Judgment

Chen Youqing, Tao Jun

Institute of Applied Psychology, Hehai University, Nanjing 210098;
Department of Student Affairs, Nanjing Finance and Economics School, Nanjing 210001

Received:2015-02-25 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 设置了母亲、朋友、老师三类重要他人，副作用结果为积极和消极两种性质的实验故事共六个，选取311名中学生阅读故事并回答问题，以此探讨青少年诺布效应的特点及其与心理状态理解的关系。结果表明：（1）青少年在对不同重要他人的积极副作用情境进行意图判断时，表现出典型的诺布效应，但在对不同重要他人的消极副作用情境进行意图判断时，没有表现出诺布效应；（2）母亲、朋友和老师这三类重要他人对于青少年意图判断的影响没有显著差异；（3）初中生和高中生、男生和女生的意图判断没有显著差异；（4）青少年认为，由消极副作用引起的被行为者的情绪以负性情绪为主，而行为者的情绪则以正性情绪为主。本研究的结论是：青少年在进行意图判断时仅出现了不完全的诺布效应。

关键词: 诺布效应, 重要他人, 意图判断, 心理理论。

Abstract: To probe into the relationship between the features of teenagers' Knobe effect and their mental state, the author selected 311 middle-school students to carry out the six-story experiment, the side-effect of which was designed as either positive or negative. The significant others are divided into 3 groups: Mother, Friend and Teacher. The outcome of this experiment indicates that: 1)typical Knobe effect is obvious when adolescent subjects pass intentional judgment on the positive side-effect situation of different significant others, whereas it cannot be observed when they make intentional judgment on the negative one; 2)there is no substantial difference in the intentional judgment among 3 groups of significant others on teenagers; 3)there is no substantial difference in the intentional judgment between middle-school students and high-school students, as well as between male and female; 4)teenagers think that the moods prompted by negative side-effect of behavioral objects are mainly negative, and those of behavioral subjects are positive mostly. The conclusion of the research is that teenagers present incomplete Knobe effect when making intentional judgment.

Key words: knobe effect, significant others, intention reasoning, theory of mind.

中图分类号:

B844.2

陈友庆, 陶君. 重要他人情境对青少年意图判断诺布效应的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(4): 471-478.

Chen Youqing, Tao Jun. The Influences of the Significant Others in Adolescents′ Knobe Effect about Intentional Judgment[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(4): 471-478.

参考文献

[1] 陈友庆, 耿海燕.(2013). 中学生心理理论在道义情境中的发展. 心理与行为研究, 11(4), 483-489.
[2] 莫雷, 张卫.(1999). 青少年发展与教育心理学. 广州: 暨南大学出版社.
[3] 张庆鹏, 刘静丽, 黄慧, 黎洁, 寇彧.(2012). 冲突情境中青少年的亲社会意图: 预期重要他人观点的影响. 心理发展与教育，28(4), 368-375.
[4] Bergin, C., Talley, S., & Hamer, L.(2003). Prosocial behaviors of young adolescents: A focus group study. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 13-32.
[5] Berndt, T. J.(1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15(6), 608-616.
[6] Feltz, A.(2007). The knobe effect: A brief overview. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 28(3-4), 265-278.
[7] Harris, J. R.(1995). Where is the child′s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458-489.
[8] Hayashi, H.(2007). Children′s moral judgments of commission and omission based on their understanding of second order mental states. Japanese Psychological Research, 49(4), 261-274.
[9] Knobe, J.(2003). Intentional action and side-effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63(279), 190-194.
[10] Knobe, J.(2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130(2), 203-231.
[11] Knobe, J., & Mendlow, G.(2004). The good, the bad and the blame worthy: Understanding the role of evaluative reasoning in folk psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 252-258.
[12] Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M.(2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment． Journal of Youth and Adolescence，29(1), 45-59.
[13] Laurent, S. M., Clark, B A. M., & Schweitzer, K A.(2015). Why side-effect outcomes do not affect intuitions about intentional actions: Properly shifting the focus from intentional outcomes back to intentional actions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 18-36.
[14] Leslie, A., Knobe, J., & Cohen, A.(2006). Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: Theory of mind and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(5), 421-427.
[15] Nadelhoffer, T.(2005). Skill, luck, control, and intentional action. Philosophical Studies, 18(3), 341-352.
[16] Shah, J.(2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 661-681.
[17] Smeesters, D., Wheeler, S. C., & Kay, A. C.(2009). The role of interpersonal perceptions in the prime-to-behavior pathway. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 395-414.
[18] Takahashi, K., & Sakamoto, K.(2000). Assessing social relationships in adolescents and adults: Constructing and validating the affective relationships scale. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(4), 451-463.
[19] Uttich, K., & Lombrozo, T.(2010). Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect. Cognition, 116(1), 87-100.