人际关系感知影响记忆从众

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用记忆再认范式,通过词组再认任务（实验一）和图形偏好选择任务（实验二）操纵同伴赞同率,诱发对不同赞同率下人际关系的感知,探索感知到的人际关系对个体记忆从众的影响。两个实验一致发现,被试对高赞同率的同伴更为信任、与他们的关系也更为亲密;更重要的是,被试的回忆也与高赞同率同伴的记忆更为一致（即回忆更为从众）,具体表现为,同伴判断正确时,被试的词组再认正确率更高,同伴判断错误时,被试的词组再认正确率更低。实验二还发现,被试与同伴一起回忆时的正确率要低于被试单独回忆的正确率,从众倾向降低了被试的记忆准确度。本研究表明,情境诱发的短期人际关系的变化会影响记忆从众;回忆不单纯是一个基本认知过程,它可以受到社会关系、社会认知的调节。

关键词: 记忆从众, 人际关系, 社会互动, 赞同率, 社会规范

Abstract: Using the memory recognition judgment paradigm, we manipulated to what extent the confederate's judgment or choice was similar to the participant's the approval rate in a recognition test(Study 1)or preference choice task(Study 2)to explore the influence of perception of interpersonal relationship induced by different levels of approval rates on memory conformity. The results in both of the studies showed that the participant felt the confederate was more trustworthy and the relationship between them was closer when the approval rate was high. More importantly, the participants conformed more when the approval rate was high than when it was low. Moreover, the participant's accuracy rate in the recognition judgment was higher when the confederate's judgment was correct, and the participant's error rate was higher when the confederate's judgment was incorrect. We also found that the accuracy rate in the recognition test was higher when the participant made the judgment freely than when he/she responded following the partner's choices. Overall, the present results indicated that the newly formed short-term relationship triggered by the approval rate in the recognition judgment or preference choice affects memory conformity and that memory can be modulated not only by basic cognitive processes but also by interpersonal relationship and social processes.

Key words: memory conformity, interpersonal relationship, social interaction, approval rate, normative influence

中图分类号:

B842.3

赵春黎, 黄禄华, 周晓林. 人际关系感知影响记忆从众[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 101-107.

Zhao Chunli, , Huang Luhua, Zhou Xiaolin. The Influence of Interpersonal Relationship on Memory Conformity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(1): 101-107.

参考文献

1 Allan, K., & Gabbert, F.(2008). I still think it was a banana: Memorable“lies”and forgettable“truths.”Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 299-308.
2 Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D.(1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
3 Axmacher, N., Gossen, A., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J.(2010). Graded effects of social conformity on recognition memory. PLoS ONE, 5(2), e9270.
4 Brown, C., & Schaefer, A.(2010). The effects of conformity on recognition judgements for emotional stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 38-44.
5 Burger, J. M., Messian, N., Patel, S., Prado, A. del, & Anderson, C.(2004). What a Coincidence?! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 35-43.
6 Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M.(2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729.
7 Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J.(1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 457-468.
8 Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J.(2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591-621.
9 Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W.(2005). Social Postwarnings of Misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 770-782.
10 French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K.(2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory, 16(3), 262-273.
11 French, L., Garry, M., & Mori, K.(2011). Relative-not absolute-judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion. Acta Psychologica, 136(1), 119-128.
12 Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K.(2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other′s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533-543.
13 Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B.(2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215-227.
14 Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B.(2007). I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity. Acta Psychologica, 124(3), 319-331.
15 Hope, L., Ost, J., Gabbert, F., Healey, S., & Lenton, E.(2008). “With a little help from my friends...”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 476-484.
16 Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L.(2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 995-1009.
17 Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R.(2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1-19.
18 Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I.(2006a). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1083-1099.
19 Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I.(2006b). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(2), 181-191.
20 Peker, M., & Tekcan, A. I.(2009). The Role of Familiarity Among Group Members in Collaborative Inhibition and Social Contagion. Social Psychology, 40(3), 111-118.
21 Pratkanis, A.(2007). The science of social influence: Advances and future progress. New York: Psychology Press.
22 Reysen, M.(2005). The effects of conformity on recognition judgements. Memory, 13(1), 87-94.
23 Trautmann-Lengsfeld, S. A., & Herrmann, C. S.(2012). EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 75-89.
24 Wright, D. B., London, K., & Waechter, M.(2010). Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(7), 1034-1045.
25 Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C.(2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 189-202.

[1]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[2]	杨冠宇, 李淑敏. 环境自我认同对大学生低碳行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 410-416.
[3]	姜媛, 田丽, 薛璐璐. 中学生自我调节学习与心理健康：学业控制感和人际关系的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 798-804.
[4]	张野, 韩雪, 李俊雅, 张珊珊. 学校人际关系对初中生乐观倾向的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 662-667.
[5]	解晓娜, 李小平. 主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 563-569.
[6]	陈琳, 乐国林, 王利敏. 依恋理论在组织研究中的应用与启示[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 853-860.
[7]	王垚, 李小平. 不同人际关系取向下的权力对利他行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 516-520.
[8]	封周奇, 白学军, 陈叶梓. 人际关系对青少年道德思维方式的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(6): 800-805.
[9]	戴斌荣,阴国恩. 农村重点高中学生学校人际关系状况的调查研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2004, 2(4): 622-625.