工作记忆和风险取向类型对情感决策的影响*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用爱荷华赌博任务（Iowa Gambling Task, IGT）范式,探究工作记忆在情感决策过程中的作用,以及风险取向类型与工作记忆的作用机制。以88名大学生为被试,采用自变量2（风险取向类型: 风险偏好/风险规避）×2（工作记忆负荷: 无负荷/有负荷）的混合实验设计。结果发现,高工作记忆负荷会降低被试的IGT成绩;工作记忆负荷和风险取向类型存在交互作用,即对于风险偏好型被试,工作记忆负荷对IGT损失敏感性的干扰并不明显,但对于风险规避型被试,高工作记忆负荷时的IGT损失敏感性比低工作记忆负荷时的更差。这些结果表明工作记忆和风险取向均会影响个体的情感决策。

关键词: 工作记忆, 风险取向类型, 爱荷华博弈任务, 情感决策

Abstract: The purpose of the present study is to see the influence of working memory on affective decision-making performance, and to reveal the mechanism behind the effects of working memory and types of risk-taking. This research took a 2(Types of risk-taking: risk preference/risk aversion)×2(Working memory load: load/non-load)mixed experimental design. The dependent variable was participants' grades of Iowa Gambling Task(IGT), which is the classic paradigm of affective decision-making in a laboratory environment. The participants are 88 university students. The results showed that high working memory load significantly declined the performance of IGT; working memory and the types of risk-taking had an interaction effect. Therefore, for participants of risk preference type, the interference of working memory on sensibility to the loss in IGT was not significant; while for the risk aversion type, when the working memory was occupied, the grades were worse. Overall, findings suggested that, both working memory and the types of risk-taking have influence on individuals' affective decision-making.

Key words: working memory, types of risk-taking, Iowa Gambling Task, affective decision-making

中图分类号:

B842.6

周灿灿, 游旭群, 漆振邦, 宁红, 袁双双, 甘萍. 工作记忆和风险取向类型对情感决策的影响*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 128-135.

Zhou Cancan, You Xuqun, Qi Zhenbang, Ning Hong, Yuan Shuangshuang, Gan Ping. The Influence of Working Memory and Types of Risk-Taking on Affective Decision-Making[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(1): 128-135.

参考文献

1 蔡厚德, 张权, 蔡琦, 陈庆荣.(2012). 爱荷华博弈任务(IGT)与决策的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展,(9), 1401-1410.
2 李小晶, 李红, 张婷, 廖渝.(2010). 奖惩频率对3-5岁幼儿完成博弈任务的影响. 心理学报, 42(3), 395-405.
3 李秀丽, 李红.(2012). 风险取向类型对爱荷华赌博成绩的影响. 心理科学, 35(1), 105-110
4 梁三才, 游旭群.(2010). 网络成瘾者情感决策能力的对照研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18, 597-599.
5 罗禹, 冯廷勇, 唐向东, 黄好, 李红.(2011). 不同类型罪犯在爱荷华赌博任务中的决策功能缺陷. 心理学报, 43(1), 30-41
6 苏倩倩, 钱白云, 郑全全.(2011). 成就目标启动对风险偏好的调节作用. 应用心理学,(1), 77-82.
7 Atkinson, J. W.(1958). Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study.
8 Baumeister, R. F., Sparks, E. A., Stillman, T. F., & Vohs, K. D.(2008). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 4-13.
9 Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P.(1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481.
10 Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W.(1998). Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 18(1), 428-437.
11 Boyer, T. W.(2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26(3), 291-345.
12 Brand, M., & Altstötter-Gleich, C.(2008). Personality and decision-making in laboratory gambling tasks-Evidence for a relationship between deciding advantageously under risk conditions and perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 226-231.
13 Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Shafir, W. D.(1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3): 367-383
14 Dretsch, M. N., & Tipples, J.(2008).Working memory involved in predicting future outcomes based on past experiences. Brain and Cognition, 66(1): 83-90.
15 Garon N, & Moore C.(2007). Awareness and symbol use improves future-oriented decision making in preschoolers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 31, 39-59
16 Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R.(2013). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
17 Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P.(1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. K. A. Gopher(Ed.), Attention and Performance. Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, 17, 653-675.
18 Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P.(2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 341-353.
19 Kerr, A., & Zelazo, P. D.(2004). Development of‘hot’executive function: The children′s gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 148-157.
20 Lejuez, C., W., Aklin, W., Jones, H., Richards, J., Strong, D., & Kahler, C.(2003). The balloon analogue risk task differentiates smokers and non-smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 26-33.
21 Lejuez, C., Aklin, W., Zvolensky, M., & Pedulla, C.(2003). Evaluation of the balloon analogue risk task(BART)as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of adolescence, 26, 475-479.
22 Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., et al.(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue task(BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84.
23 Lejuez, C. W., Simmons, B. L., Aklin, W. M., Daughters, S. B., & Dvir, S.(2004). Risk-taking propensity and risk sexual behavior of individuals in residential substance use treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1643-1647.
24 Nigg, J. T.(2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and persolnality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220-246.
25 Overman, W. H., Frassrand, K., Ansel, S., Trawalter, S., Bies, B., ＆ Redmond, A.(2004). Performance on the IOWA card task by adolescents and adults. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1838-1851.
26 Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R.(1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.
27 Séguin, J. R., Arseneault, L., & Tremblay, R. E.(2007). The contribution of“cool”and“hot”components of decision-making in adolescence: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Cognitive Development, 22(4), 530-543.
28 Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E.(2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical psychology review, 30(5), 562-581.

[1]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[2]	王家慰, 冼美君, 邢强. 任务数量与工作记忆容量对交错学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 15-21.
[3]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[4]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.
[5]	车晓玮, 王凯旋, 上官梦麒, 李寿欣. 视觉工作记忆中注意模板的表征—来自EROS的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 297-303.
[6]	唐丹丹, 傅瑜, 吴燕京, 朱海. 视觉空间工作记忆组间差异的神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 176-184.
[7]	吴国来, 张婧婧, 任方圆, 杨晶晶, 酒艳红. 工作记忆容量与走神频率关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 461-471.
[8]	张心, 宋锦涛, 应荣华, 周仁来. 工作记忆训练效果是安慰剂作用的结果吗？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 170-177.
[9]	杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.
[10]	宗正, 李红霞, 司继伟. 心算形式对不同近似数量系统敏锐度儿童心算表现的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 505-511.
[11]	谭珂, 马杰, 连坤予, 郭志英, 白学军. 双重缺陷汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的言语工作记忆和阅读能力研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 308-314,354.
[12]	刘含君兰, 赵守盈, 郭海辉. 篮球运动员视觉工作记忆对注意控制的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 315-320.
[13]	孔海燕, 孙雨, 宋广文. 心智游移、工作记忆对初中生阅读理解的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 362-370,377.
[14]	侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 方晓义. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393.
[15]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和, 陈艺萍, 白学军. 工作记忆和类比推理与初一年级学生数学成绩的关系：有调节的中介效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 495-499.