与恐惧相关的简化刺激在不同知觉负载条件下的注意捕获效应*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 62-68.

与恐惧相关的简化刺激在不同知觉负载条件下的注意捕获效应*

安蓉, 孟繁莹

天津大学教育学院,天津 300300
上海体育学院运动科学学院,上海 200438

收稿日期:2015-04-06 出版日期:2017-01-20 发布日期:2017-03-02
通讯作者: 孟繁莹,E-mail: mengfanying_tjupsy@126.com。
基金资助:
* 天津市哲学社会科学规划项目（TJJX12-O33）

The Simplified Images of Fear-relevant Stimuli Are Processed Automatically

An Rong, Meng Fanying

School of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072; School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sports, Shanghai 200438

Received:2015-04-06 Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究选用视觉搜索范式,探讨了与恐惧相关的简化刺激在不同知觉负载条件下的注意捕获效应。结果发现：在分心物刺激为清晰的条件下,与恐惧相关的分心物刺激能够优先捕获被试注意,即使分心物刺激在一定程度上被简化,与恐惧相关的简化分心物刺激依然具有加工优先权,并且与恐惧相关的简化刺激在低知觉负载条件下和高知觉负载条件下的注意捕获量并没有显著差异,这一结果表明,与恐惧相关的简化刺激不受知觉负载的限制,能够自动化加工。

关键词: 与恐惧相关, 简化刺激, 知觉负载, 注意捕获

Abstract: The study used the visual search paradigm, examining the attention capture effect of the simplified images of fear-relevant stimuli at different perceptual load conditions. The conclusion of this study are: under the clear stimuli condition, the fear-relevant stimuli can capture participants' attention preferentially. To some extent, even though distractors are simplified, the fear-relevant stimuli initiate preferential processing. The amount of attentional capture of the simplified images of fear-relevant stimuli at different perceptual load conditions are not significantly different. The results indicated that the simplified images of fear-relevant stimuli are not restricted by perceptual load, and can be processed automatically.

Key words: simplified stimuli, perceptual load, attention capture

中图分类号:

B842.1

安蓉, 孟繁莹. 与恐惧相关的简化刺激在不同知觉负载条件下的注意捕获效应*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 62-68.

An Rong, Meng Fanying. The Simplified Images of Fear-relevant Stimuli Are Processed Automatically[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(1): 62-68.

参考文献

1 邓晓红, 张德玄, 黄诗雪, 袁雯, 周晓琳.(2010). 阈上和阈下不同情绪线索对返回抑制的影响. 心理学报, 42(3), 325-333.
2 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉.(2009). 负性情绪刺激是否总是优先得到加工: ERP研究. 心理学报, 41(9), 822-831.
3 何媛媛, 袁加锦, 伍泽莲, 李红.(2008). 正性情绪刺激效价强度的变化对外倾个体注意的调制作用. 心理学报, 40(11), 1158-1164.
4 李静华, 郑涌.(2014). 内隐/外显不同水平攻击者的注意偏向: 行为和ERP证据. 心理科学, 37(1), 40-47.
5 孟昭兰.(2005). 情绪心理学. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
6 王敬欣, 贾丽萍, 白学军, 罗跃嘉.(2013). 返回抑制过程中情绪面孔加工优先: ERPs研究. 心理学报, 45(1), 1-10.
7 王敬欣, 田静, 贾丽萍, 李永鑫.(2012). 负性信息自动捕获注意: 来自返回抑制的证据. 中国特殊教育, 142(4), 93-96.
8 杨小东, 罗跃嘉.(2004). 注意受情绪信息影响的实验范式. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 833-841.
9 杨昭宁, 苏金龙.(2012). 恐惧产生机制的进化视角: 恐惧模块说. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 30(4), 51-57.
10 张庆, 张杰栋, 胡思源, 刘嘉.(2011). 不受知觉负载调节的注意捕获效应: 生态信息的作用. 心理学报, 43(11), 1229-1238.
11 朱诗敏, 郑希付.(2009). 短影片启动情绪对注意偏向的影响. 心理科学, 32(2), 327-330.
12 Anderson, A. K.(2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 258-281.
13 Barratt, D., & Bundesen, C.(2012). Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings. Cognition and Emotion, 26(7), 1223-1237.
14 Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M.(2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(6), 1004-1013.
15 Forbes, S. J., Purkis, H. M., & Lipp, O. V.(2011). Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 794-804.
16 Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R. D.(1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 917-924.
17 Ikeda, K., Sugiura, A., & Hasegawa, T.(2013). Fearful faces grab attention in the absence of late affective cortical responses. Psychophysiology, 50, 60-69.
18 Keil, A., & Ihssen, N.(2004). Identification facilitation for emotionally arousing verbs during the attentional blink. Emotion, 4(1), 2-35.
19 Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y.(1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception Psychophysics, 56(2), 183-197.
20 Lipp, O. V.(2006). Of snakes and flowers: Does preferential detection of pictures of fear-relevant animals in visual search reflect on fear-relevance?. Emotion, 6(2), 296-308.
21 Lipp, O. V., & Waters, A. M.(2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192-200.
22 Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C.(1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behavior Research and Therapy, 23, 563-569.
23 Ö hman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F.(2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466-478.
24 Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F.(2011). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396.
25 Öhman, A., & Mineka, S.(2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483-522.
26 Purkis, H. M., & Lipp, O. V.(2007). Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: Preferential attention without implicit valence. Emotion, 7, 314-323.
27 Shiho, M., & Syoichi, I.(2009). Effect of negative emotion on visual attention：Automatic capture by fear-related stimuli. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(1), 13-23.
28 Soares, S. C., Esteves, F., Lundqvist, D., &Öhman, A.(2009). Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(12), 1032-1042.
29 Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G.(1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
30 Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C.(1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37 , 25-43.
31 Yantis, S., & Jonides, J.(1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 121-134.
32 Yorzinski, J. L., Penkunas, M. J., Platt, M. L., & Coss. R. G.(2014). Dangerous animals capture and maintain attention in Humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 534-548.

[1]	刘丽, 李士一, 岳俊冰, 白学军. 位置-价值联结引发的注意捕获及其机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 289-295.
[2]	杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.
[3]	张嘉卉, 梁丽美, 刘强, 李永芬, 张忠炉, 贾江晓, 张文海, 李红. 自上而下任务定势影响基于关系的注意捕获[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 727-733.
[4]	王庭照,杨鹃. 不同工作记忆负荷下聋人与听力正常人注意捕获的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(5): 601-606.