书写习惯对数字空间表征SNARC效应的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5): 618-623.

书写习惯对数字空间表征SNARC效应的影响

李雅君^1,2, 刘阳^1,2, 闻素霞^1,2

1. 新疆师范大学心智发展与学习科学重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017;
2. 新疆师范大学教育科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830017

收稿日期:2018-01-15 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-09-19
通讯作者: 闻素霞,E-mail:wsx@xjnu.edu.com
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划重点项目（AMA170012）和新疆师范大学2016年研究生科研创新项目（XSY201601002）

The Influence of Writing Habit on SNARC Effect in Numbers Spatial Representation

LI Yajun^1,2, LIU Yang^1,2, WEN Suxia^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Mental Development and Learning Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumchi 830017, China;
2. Xinjiang Normal University-College of Educational Science, Urumchi 830017, China

Received:2018-01-15 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文设计两个实验，采用大小判断任务，选取读写习惯相反的维、汉大学生为研究对象，探讨两类被试对阿拉伯数字和母语数字空间表征的一致性与差异性。结果发现：（1）维、汉被试均表现出对阿拉伯小数反应左手快于右手，对大数反应右手快于左手，即出现正向SNARC效应；（2）维吾尔族被试表现出对母语小数反应右手快于左手，对大数反应左手快于右手，即对母语数字出现反向SNARC效应；汉族被试表现出对母语小数反应左手快于右手，对大数反应右手快于左手，即对母语数字出现正向SNARC效应。结论：（1）维、汉被试对于阿拉伯数字的SNARC效应存在一致性；（2）维、汉被试母语数字的SNARC效应存在差异性；（3）数字空间对应性与书写习惯是导致结果的重要因素。

关键词: SNARC效应, 心理数字线, 一致性, 差异性

Abstract: This paper designs two experiments, uses "magnitude judgment" paradigm, selects the Uygur and Han college students to explore the consistency and difference of the SNARC effect between Arabia digital number and their mother tongue numeral. The results showed that:1) To the Arabic numerals, the Uygur and Han subjects showed larger numbers are faster responded to with the right hand while smaller numbers are faster responded to with the left, indicating a SNARC effect; 2) The Uygur subjects to their native-language numbers showed smaller numbers are slower responded than larger numbers with the left hand while faster with the right hand, indicating a reversal SNARC effect; The Han subjects to their native-language numbers showed smaller numbers are faster responded than larger numbers with the left hand while slower with the right hand, indicating a SNARC effect. Conclusions:1) Uygur and Han subjects are consistent for the SNARC effect of Arabia numbers. 2) Uygur and Han subjects are different for the SNARC effect of native-numbers. 3) Numbers spatial correspondence and writing habits are important factors leading to the results.

Key words: SNARC, mental number line, consistent, different

中图分类号:

B842.1

李雅君, 刘阳, 闻素霞. 书写习惯对数字空间表征SNARC效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 618-623.

LI Yajun, LIU Yang, WEN Suxia. The Influence of Writing Habit on SNARC Effect in Numbers Spatial Representation[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(5): 618-623.

参考文献

定险峰, 靖桂芳, 徐成. (2010). SNARC效应起源的实验研究. 心理科学, 33(5), 1258-1261
顾艳艳, 张志杰. (2012). 汉语背景下左右走向的心理时间线. 心理科学, 35(4), 51-56
刘超, 买晓琴, 傅小兰. (2004). 不同注意条件下的空间-数字反应编码联合效应. 心理学报, 36(6), 671-680
乔福强, 张恩涛, 陈功香. (2016). 情境对序数的空间表征之影响. 心理科学, 39(3), 566-572
沈模卫, 田瑛, 丁海杰. (2006). 一位阿拉伯数字的空间表征. 心理科学, 29(2), 258-262
王强强. (2015). SNARC效应的起因探究-大小还是顺序信息引起? (硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学.
张丽, 陈雪梅, 王琦, 李红. (2012). 身体形式和社会环境对SNARC效应的影响:基于具身认知观的理解. 心理学报, 44(10), 1309-1317
张宇, 游旭群. (2012). 负数的空间表征引起的空间注意转移. 心理学报, 44(3), 285-294
Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36(8), 731-735.
Bull, R., Marschark, M., & Blatto-Vallee, G. (2005). SNARC hunting:Examining number representation in deaf students. Learning & Individual Differences, 15(3), 223-236.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 122(3), 371-396.
Dodd, M. D. (2011). Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 75(1), 2-9.
Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., & Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 415-423.
Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87(3), B87-B95.
Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers:Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 662-673.
Jonas, C. N., Taylor, A. J. G., Hutton, S., Weiss, P. H., & Ward, J. (2011). Visuo-spatial representations of the alphabet in synaesthetes and non-synaesthetes. Journal of Neuropsychology, 5(2), 302-322.
Keus, I. M., Jenks, K. M., & Schwarz, W. (2005). Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 48-56.
Nuerk, H. C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82(1), B25-B33.
Rubinsten, O., Henik, A., Berger, A., & Shahar-Shalev, S. (2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(1), 74-92.
Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line:Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 651-664.
Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 328-331.
Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing:The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 5(1), 165-190.

[1]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[2]	潘运, 赵竹君, 戴隆农. 言语与空间任务指令对数字-空间联结编码的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 734-740.
[3]	潘运, 杨阳, 邹昌浪, 陈衍, 龙女. 基于主体和客体的空间参照框架对数字-空间联结的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 613-619.
[4]	郝海平, 范宁. 反应模式对时间空间一致性效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 178-184.
[5]	李芳. 情绪一致性编码与情绪一致性提取的非对称性研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 440-448.
[6]	金桂春, 王有智, 王丽. Simon效应对空间-数字反应编码联合效应的抑制作用^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 489-494.
[7]	皇甫刚,吕峰,孙道军,肖春锦,司莙鹏. 雇主品牌结构与求职倾向关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 647-656.
[8]	俞晨怡,张啸,王芳,左世江. 自我概念与商品形象的一致性和仿制商品消费及使用的关系: 作用与反作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 685-690.
[9]	金桂春,王强强,王有智,吴彦文. 数字SNARC效应中大小和顺序信息的分离^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 228-233.
[10]	王建峰,皇甫桦彦. 基于自我决定视角的动机结构与主观幸福感的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(2): 234-240.
[11]	周爱保, 刘沛汝, 张彦驰, 尹玉龙, 张奋. 自我情绪一致性效应及其可逆性：探究负荷理论[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 433-440.
[12]	李芳, 张海燕, 田锐, 丁亮. 前瞻记忆的情绪一致性反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 198-204.
[13]	赵杨,王林,时勘. 微博网民情绪敏感度、行为意向与执行意向的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 99-105.
[14]	齐佳凝，任桂琴，任延涛，蒙雪. 图-图干扰范式中语义效应的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 188-192.
[15]	吴彦文, 杨龙. 计数单位的空间联合编码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 440-443.