连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 145-152.

• 基础心理学 • 下一篇

连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制

白学军¹, 张琪涵¹, 赵光², 孙弘进³, 陈怡馨¹, 孙世南¹, 章鹏¹, 宋璐¹, 杨宇¹, 原胜¹

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074;
2. 辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心, 大连 116029;
3. 麦克马斯特大学心理神经科学与行为系, 加拿大 0NL8S4L8

收稿日期:2018-12-02 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-04-19
通讯作者: 白学军,E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（18JJD190001）和“长江学者奖励计划”特聘教授项目（T2017120）资助

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Obstacle Affecting Individual Motion in Continuous Reach Motion

BAI Xuejun¹, ZHANG Qihan¹, ZHAO Guang², SUN Hongjin³, CHEN Yixin¹, SUN Shinan¹, ZHANG Peng¹, SONG Lu¹, YANG Yu¹, YUAN Sheng¹

1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University,Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300074, China;
2. Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;
3. Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Canada ONL8S4L8

Received:2018-12-02 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-04-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究连续触点运动中障碍物对个体运动轨迹的影响，采用运动捕捉系统及近红外光谱脑成像技术（fNIRS），监测并分析了20名普通大学生在有、无障碍物情境下完成连续触点运动时的运动轨迹及大脑皮层活动。结果发现：相比于无障碍物条件，当连续运动中有障碍物时，周围运动区间的平均运动高度更高；障碍物对后面区间内的运动高度的影响程度显著高于前面的区间。另外，个体在有障碍物条件下双侧背外侧前额叶及双侧布罗卡区岛盖部的激活强度显著低于无障碍物条件，且障碍物对个体平均运动高度的影响越大，右侧这两个区域的激活水平越低。这说明障碍物对其前后运动区间内的运动轨迹都产生了影响，支持了物体可供性及计划再利用的观点，背外侧前额叶及布罗卡区岛盖部可能参与了这一加工。

关键词: 运动计划, 触点运动, 背外侧前额叶, 功能性近红外光谱脑成像技术（fNIRS）

Abstract: To study the influence of obstacles on individual movement track in continuous reach motion, in this study, we collected and analyzed the movement track and cerebral cortex activity data of 20 undergraduate who completed the continuous reach motion in the presence or absence of obstacles, with motion capture system and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The results show that when there are obstacles in the process of continuous motion, the average motion height of the individual in the peripheral motion interval is higher, compared to the absence of obstacles; specifically the effect of obstacles on the height of motion in the back interval is significantly higher than that in the preceding interval. Additionally, the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal and bilateral pars opercularis of Broca's area show significant decrease in activation in the presence of obstacles, compared to the absence of obstacles, and there is a significant negative correlation between the effect of obstacle on the average motor height and the activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal and right pars opercularis of Broca's area. These findings imply that the obstacle affects the individual's motion track in the forward and back movement interval, and the brain regions including dorsolateral prefrontal and pars opercularis of Broca's area are involved in this process. These findings support the view that Object Affordance and Reuse of Previous Movement Plans.

Key words: motor planning, reach motion, dorsolateral prefrontal, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)

中图分类号:

B842.9

白学军, 张琪涵, 赵光, 孙弘进, 陈怡馨, 孙世南, 章鹏, 宋璐, 杨宇, 原胜. 连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 145-152.

BAI Xuejun, ZHANG Qihan, ZHAO Guang, SUN Hongjin, CHEN Yixin, SUN Shinan, ZHANG Peng, SONG Lu, YANG Yu, YUAN Sheng. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Obstacle Affecting Individual Motion in Continuous Reach Motion[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(2): 145-152.

参考文献

白学军, 张琪涵, 章鹏, 周菘, 刘颖, 宋星, 彭国慧. (2016). 基于fNIRS的运动执行与运动想象脑激活模式比较. 心理学报, 48(5), 495-508, doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00495
Aflalo, T., Kellis, S., Klaes, C., Lee, B., Shi, Y., Pejsa, K., … Andersen, R. A. (2015). Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science, 348(6237), 906-910, doi:10.1126/science.aaa5417.
Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 20(1), 303-330, doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.303.
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London:Pergamon.
Cisek, P. (2005). Neural representations of motor plans, desired trajectories, and controlled objects. Cognitive Processing, 6(1), 15-24, doi:10.1007/s10339-004-0046-7.
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements:An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(7), 1688-1703, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-07-01688.1985.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
Heinrichs-Graham, E., & Wilson, T. W. (2015). Coding complexity in the human motor circuit. Human Brain Mapping, 36(12), 5155-5167, doi:10.1002/hbm.23000.
Hoshi, Y., Kobayashi, N., & Tamura, M. (2001). Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals:A study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. Journal of Applied Physiology, 90(5), 1657-1662, doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1657.
Jang, K. E., Tak, S., Jung, J., Jang, J., Jeong, Y., & Ye, J. C. (2009). Wavelet minimum description length detrending for near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 14(3), 034004, doi:10.1117/1.3127204.
Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance:Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 33(2), 425-441, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425.
Jax, S. A., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Vaughan, J. (2007). Extending Fitts' law to manual obstacle avoidance. Experimental Brain Research, 180(4), 775-779, doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0996-y.
Jax, S. A., Rosenbaum, D. A., Vanghan, J., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2003). Computational motor control and human factors:Modeling movements in real and possible environments. Human Factors, 45(1), 5-27, doi:10.1518/hfes.45.1.5.27226.
Kaller, C. P., Heinze, K., Frenkel, A., Läppchen, C. H., Unterrainer, J. M., Weiller, C., … Rahm, B. (2013). Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning. Human Brain Mapping, 34(1), 36-51, doi:10.1002/hbm.v34.1.
Kashima, T., & Isurugi, Y. (1998). Trajectory formation based on physiological characteristics of skeletal muscles. Biological Cybernetics, 78(6), 413-422, doi:10.1007/s004220050445.
Kilner, J. M. (2011). More than one pathway to action understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 352-357, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.005.
Kourtis, D., Vandemaele, P., & Vingerhoets, G. (2018). Concurrent cortical representations of function-and size-related object affordances:An fMRI study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1221-1232.
Lashley, K. S. (1930). Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Psychological Review, 37(1), 1-24, doi:10.1037/h0074134.
Maidan, I., Shustak, S., Sharon, T., Bernad-Elazari, H., Geffen, N., Giladi, N., … Mirelman, A. (2018). Prefrontal cortex activation during obstacle negotiation:What's the effect size and timing? Brain and Cognition, 122, 45-51, doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.006.
Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Breuer, A. T. (2011). Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1470-1484, doi:10.1037/a0023509.
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., & Nitsche, M. A. (2018). Interaction of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) and right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in hot and cold executive functions:Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroscience, 369, 109-123, doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.10.042.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness:The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113, doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
Pilacinski, A., & Lindner, A. (2019). Distinct contributions of human posterior parietal and dorsal premotor cortex to reach trajectory planning. Scientific Reports, 9, 1962, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39188-0.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning:Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108(4), 709-734, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.709.
Shenoy, K. V., Sahani, M., & Churchland, M. M. (2013). Cortical control of arm movements:A dynamical systems perspective. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36(1), 337-359, doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150509.
Svoboda, K., & Li, N. (2018). Neural mechanisms of movement planning:Motor cortex and beyond. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 49, 33-41, doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.023.
van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Fleckenstein, R. M., Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance:Evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1117-1126, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1117.
Vaughan, J., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Meulenbroek, R. G. J. (2001). Planning reaching and grasping movements:The problem of obstacle avoidance. Motor Control, 5(2), 116-135, doi:10.1123/mcj.5.2.116.
Wong, A. L., Haith, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. (2015). Motor planning. The Neuroscientist, 21(4), 385-398, doi:10.1177/1073858414541484.
Ye, J. C., Tak, S., Jang, K. E., Jung, J., & Jang, J. (2009). NIRS-SPM:Statistical parametric mapping for near-infrared spectroscopy. NeuroImage, 44(2), 428-447, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.036.

[1]	凌晓丽, 孙鹏. 损失情境下社会困境中的合作行为[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 377-383.
[2]	王兴超, 杨继平, 高玲. 公民道德推脱问卷的中文版修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(6): 838-842.
[3]	宋广文；郭永香；赵平平3. 高低行为激活系统个体在赌博任务下的决策模[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 88-92.
[4]	许锦民,郑希付,宫火良. 数学不良儿童的书写运动控制特征[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2008, 6(2): 94-97.

连续触点运动中障碍物影响个体运动的认知神经机制

The Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Obstacle Affecting Individual Motion in Continuous Reach Motion

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价