汉语阅读中的眼跳目标选择：词汇信息与视觉复杂性的作用

心理与行为研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 496-503.

汉语阅读中的眼跳目标选择：词汇信息与视觉复杂性的作用

李馨^1,2,3, 刘璟尧^1,2,3, 于慧婧^1,2,3, 姜心荷^1,2,3, 梁菲菲⁴, 王永胜^1,2,3, 白学军^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
3. 国民心理健康评估与促进协同创新中心, 天津 300387;
4. 天津师范大学教育学部, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-03-10 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-08-08
通讯作者: 李馨, 白学军
基金资助:
天津市教委科研计划项目成果“手写文本阅读的眼动控制”（2018SK045）

The Decision of Saccadic Target Selection in Chinese Reading: The Interactive Way of Visual and Lexical Information

LI Xin^1,2,3, LIU Jingyao^1,2,3, YU Huijing^1,2,3, JIANG Xinhe^1,2,3, LIANG Feifei⁴, WANG Yongsheng^1,2,3, BAI Xuejun^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, Tianjin 300387;
4. Faculty of Education, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387

Received:2019-03-10 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用Landolt范式，要求被试分别阅读由汉字和改编后的韩语符号组成的句子，探讨汉字的笔画数对眼跳目标选择的影响是由视觉复杂性引起，还是由视觉复杂性导致的认知加工复杂性引起。结果发现：是否存在词汇信息不仅影响跳读率和平均向前眼跳幅度，还会对首次注视和单次注视中的平均注视位置产生影响。结果表明，汉字的笔画数对眼跳目标选择的影响，既与视觉复杂性有关，也与认知加工复杂性有关，即与词汇信息有关。研究结果支持“战略-战术”模型。

关键词: 视觉复杂性, 注视位置, Landolt范式

Abstract: The present study was aimed at investigating the role of visual complexity of characters on saccadic targeting while the influence of lexical properties was well controlled. The Landolt paradigm was used while participants were instructed to read sentences that were consisted of normal Chinese characters, or were consisted of the artificial characters that were constructed based on the Korean characters. The visual complexity of each character in two types of sentences were strictly matched. The results showed that participants exhibited longer forward saccade lengths, and more refixations on words when reading normal sentences with both lexical and visual information compared to that only with visual information, suggesting that both visual and lexical information influence the decision of where to move the eyes. The present study provide evidence for the "strategy-tactics" theory.

Key words: visual complexity, landing position, Landolt paradigm

中图分类号:

B842

李馨, 刘璟尧, 于慧婧, 姜心荷, 梁菲菲, 王永胜, 白学军. 汉语阅读中的眼跳目标选择：词汇信息与视觉复杂性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 496-503.

LI Xin, LIU Jingyao, YU Huijing, JIANG Xinhe, LIANG Feifei, WANG Yongsheng, BAI Xuejun. The Decision of Saccadic Target Selection in Chinese Reading: The Interactive Way of Visual and Lexical Information[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(4): 496-503.

参考文献

白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 85-91
白学军, 孟红霞, 王敬欣, 田静, 臧传丽, 闫国利. (2011). 阅读障碍儿童与其年龄和能力匹配儿童阅读空格文本的注视位置效应. 心理学报, 43(8), 851-862
李馨. (2018). 双语阅读中的眼动研究. 天津:天津社会科学院出版社.
李玉刚, 黄忍, 滑慧敏, 李兴珊. (2017). 阅读中的眼跳目标选择问题. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 404-412
梁菲菲, 王永胜, 杨文, 白学军. (2017). 阅读水平调节儿童阅读眼动注视模式的发展:基于9-11岁儿童的证据. 心理学报, 49(4), 450-459
孟红霞, 白学军, 闫国利, 姚海娟. (2014). 汉字笔画数对注视位置效应的影响. 心理科学, 37(4), 809-815
王永胜, 赵冰洁, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理学报, 50(12), 1336-1345
臧传丽, 孟红霞, 白学军, 闫国利. (2013). 阅读过程中的注视位置效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 770-775
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4:Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42.
Clifton, C. J., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., & Schotter, E. R. (2016). Eye movements in reading and information processing:Keith Rayner's 40 years legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1-19, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.004.
Hillen, R., Günther, T., Kohlen, C., Eckers, C., van Ermingen-Marbach, M., Sass, K., & Heim, S. (2013). Identifying brain systems for gaze orienting during reading:fMRI investigation of the Landolt paradigm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 384.
Joseph, H. S. S. L., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 49(16), 2078-2086, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.015.
Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems:A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(2), 895-913, doi:10.1037/a0033580.
Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading:Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51(10), 1146-1156, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.004.
Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Huang, R. (2015). Eye-movement control during the reading of Chinese:An analysis using the Landolt-C paradigm. arXiv:1503.07610.
Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41(4), 1229-1236.
Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 42(7), 1008-1025.
Ma, G. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 747-761, doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9548-1.
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2004). The potential contribution of preplanned refixations to the preferred viewing location. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(6), 1033-1044.
O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition:A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 185-197, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.185.
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49(15), 1994-2000, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009.
R Development Core Team. (2014). R:A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria:The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL:http://www.R-project.org/
Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading:Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 3-26.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506, doi:10.1080/17470210902816461.
Richter, E. M., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2006). Current advances in SWIFT. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1), 23-33, doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.003.
Wei, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80, 1-6, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.015.
Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Searching for an O in an array of Cs:Eye movements track moment-to-moment processing in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(3), 372-381.
Williams, C. C., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2014). Examining eye movements in visual search through clusters of objects in a circular array. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 1-14, doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.865630.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725, doi:10.1080/17470210903114858.
Zang, C. L., Liang, F. F., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 39(3), 720-734.

[1]	郭志英, 谭珂, 宋星, 彭国慧, 白学军. 视觉复杂性和字间距调节汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉拥挤效应:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 603-611.
[2]	吴捷；刘志方；刘妮娜. 词频、可预测性及合理性对目标词首次注视位置的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 140-146.