执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 53-59.

执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制

干加裙¹, 张曼曼¹, 胡锦慧¹, 郭云飞^1,2, 陈幼贞¹

1. 福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350108;
2. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715

收稿日期:2018-01-08 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-04-07
通讯作者: 陈幼贞,E-mail:chenyouzhen08@163.com
基金资助:
全国教育科学“十三五”规划国家一般项目（BBA180082）

The Underlying Mechanism of Implementation Intention on Event-Based Prospective Memory

GAN Jiaqun¹, ZHANG Manman¹, HU Jinhui¹, GUO Yunfei^1,2, CHEN Youzhen¹

1. School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350108;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received:2018-01-08 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在探究不同执行意向编码形式对前瞻记忆加工机制的影响是否存在差异。结果显示在低认知负荷下，混合编码效果最好，仅执行意向编码次之，标准编码效果最差，而在高认知负荷下三种编码效果无差异。眼动指标显示在低认知负荷下混合编码的注视点数量最多，总注视时间最长；在混合编码条件下进行中任务和前瞻记忆任务的总注视时间均长于仅执行意向编码和标准编码。结果说明，执行意向编码容易受认知负荷的影响；在低认知负荷下混合编码的被试对任务刺激进行更多的监控和加工，而仅执行意向编码促进前瞻记忆任务的自动化加工。

关键词: 前瞻记忆, 执行意向, 想象, 认知负荷

Abstract: The present study adopted eye tracking technique to explore how the processing mechanism of event-based prospective memory varies under different encoding strategies by using a dual task paradigm which combining ongoing task and prospective memory task. In ongoing task, which was a visual search task, a target cue was presented firstly and then was followed by a letter string; participants were required to judge whether or not the letter string contains the previously presented target cue. In the prospective memory task, participants were asked to press a certain key upon the presentation of a specific target letter. The results showed that the effect of different encoding strategies on the prospective memory was moderated by the cognitive load. Under low cognitive load, the prospective memory performance was significantly improved in the condition of mixed encoding compared to the other ways of encoding; while implementation intention encoding was better than the standard condition. However, no significant difference was found under high cognitive load. Meanwhile, the number of fixation count and the total fixation time under the mixed encoding condition were the largest under low cognitive load. These results suggest that mixed encoding may facilitate the monitoring and searching of prospective memory under low cognitive load, while implementation intention encoding facilitates the automatic processing.

Key words: prospective memory, implementation intention, imagery, cognitive loading

中图分类号:

B842.3

干加裙, 张曼曼, 胡锦慧, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 执行意向影响事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.

GAN Jiaqun, ZHANG Manman, HU Jinhui, GUO Yunfei, CHEN Youzhen. The Underlying Mechanism of Implementation Intention on Event-Based Prospective Memory[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(1): 53-59.

参考文献

陈思佚, 周仁来. (2010). 前瞻记忆需要经过策略加工: 来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 42(12), 1128-1136
郭云飞, 干加裙, 张哲, 黄婷红, 陈幼贞. (2016). 编码方式、认知负荷和线索数量对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理科学, 39(5), 1058-1063
郭云飞, 辛聪, 干加裙, 陈幼贞. (2017). 任务规律性对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理科学, 40(6), 1309-1315
沈德立, 白学军, 臧传丽, 闫国利, 冯本才, 范晓红. (2010). 词切分对初学者句子阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 42(2), 159-172
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605
Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 946-960, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.946.
Brewer, G. A., Knight, J., Meeks, J. T., & Marsh, R. L. (2011). On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 901-907, doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.015.
Bugg, J. M., Scullin, M. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 522-527.
Burkard, C., Rochat, L., van der Linden, A. C. J., Gold, G., & van der Linden, M. (2014). Is working memory necessary for implementation intentions to enhance prospective memory in older adults with cognitive problems? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(1), 37-43, doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.01.004.
Chen, X. J., Wang, Y., Liu, L. L., Cui, J. F., Gan, M. Y., Shum, D. H. K., & Chan, R. C. K. (2015). The effect of implementation intention on prospective memory: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychiatry Research, 226(1), 14-22, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.011.
Cohen, A. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives (pp. 367-390). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2013). Implementation intentions. In M. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicin (pp. 1043-1048). New York: Springer.
McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 716-724.
McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. (2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38(2), 221-232.
McFarland, C., & Glisky, E. (2012). Implementation intentions and imagery: Individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults. Memory & Cognition, 40(1), 62-69.
Meeks, J. T., & Marsh, R. L. (2010). Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks. Psychological Research, 74(1), 82-89, doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0223-x.
Smith, R. E., Rogers, M. D. M., McVay, J. C., Lopez, J. A., & Loft, S. (2014). Investigating how implementation intentions improve non-focal prospective memory tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 213-230, doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.003.

[1]	杨玲, 杨晓惠, 张莉媛, 李赟, 曹华, 张建勋. 未来情景想象对海洛因戒断者跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 535-541.
[2]	江黛苔, 段亚杰, 严帅, 付思文, 刘伟. 事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 312-318.
[3]	赵婷婷, 杨晓梦, 张洋, 王燕青, 谢和平, 王福兴. 多媒体学习中线索原则是否存在经验逆转效应？——来自两项元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 22-29.
[4]	刘红, 褚铮, 李缓缓, 赵笑梅. 自我损耗对基于时间前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 446-451,459.
[5]	孙崇勇, 刘丽丽, 高春阳. 翻转教学法对高中生认知负荷及学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 369-375.
[6]	龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王祯, 徐升, 刘小先. 基于计算机的反馈复杂性和先前知识对学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 765-772.
[7]	张冬梅, 路海东. 文本学习中运用先行组织者策略的知识反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 83-90.
[8]	张锦坤, 刘晓倩, 杨丽娴. 背景图相关度与知觉流畅性对意义材料学习的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 757-762.
[9]	胡炜宇, 齐冰. 提示促进时间性前瞻记忆：内、外部控制的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 188-194.
[10]	干加裙, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 张哲, 陈幼贞. 执行意向在不同认知负荷下对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 743-749.
[11]	龚少英, 张盼盼, 上官晨雨. 学习者控制和任务难度对多媒体学习的影响^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 335-342.
[12]	郭丰波, 韦义平, 高宇, 王益文,. 背景任务对前瞻记忆策略加工的影响：一项ERPs研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 75-82.
[13]	孙崇勇. 英语多媒体学习中言语关联手势对认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 633-639.
[14]	李芳, 张海燕, 田锐, 丁亮. 前瞻记忆的情绪一致性反转效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 198-204.
[15]	赵杨,王林,时勘. 微博网民情绪敏感度、行为意向与执行意向的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(1): 99-105.