汉字亚词汇部件语音加工的P200效应

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 亚词汇加工是词汇识别研究中的一个重要领域，本研究考察了早期ERP成分P200如何受到汉字亚词汇部件语音信息的影响。在ERP实验中，被试对顺序呈现的启动字和目标字对进行语义判断。实验中“启动字-目标字”字对共享一个共同的可发音或不可发音的部件（如“吹-砍”、“扬-场”）。对目标字的P200效应分析显示：与部件不发音的目标字相比，部件可发音的目标字所诱发的P200显著增强。这种增强的ERP效应表明P200对汉字识别中亚词汇部件的语音加工非常敏感，其效应变化受到亚词汇语音的单独调节，同时也表明在汉字识别的早期阶段亚词汇部件语音信息就已被激活并在汉字加工中起重要作用。

关键词: P200, 部件, 语音, 亚词汇, 汉字识别

Abstract: Sub-lexical processing is an important topic in word recognition. The present study examined whether or not P200 is modulated by sub-lexical phonological processing in Chinese word recognition. Participants performed a semantic judgment task on prime-target pairs of words matched in frequency, strokes, and consistency. The critical pairs shared a phonetic radical which was either pronounceable or unpronounceable. P200 elicited by the target was significantly larger in the pronounceable condition than the unpronounceable one. Combined with previous findings, the results present clearly evidence that P200 is an ERP marker for sub-lexical phonological processing in Chinese word reading.

Key words: P200, radical, phonology, sub-lexical, Chinese word recognition

中图分类号:

B842.1

孔令跃, 张豹. 汉字亚词汇部件语音加工的P200效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 304-310.

KONG Lingyue, ZHANG Bao. The Effect of Sub-Lexical Phonology on P200 in Chinese Word Recognition[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 304-310.

参考文献

北京语言学院语言教学研究所(编). (1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社.
毕鸿燕, 胡伟, 翁旭初. (2006). 汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响. 心理学报, 38(6), 791-797
陈新葵, 张积家. (2012). 义符熟悉性对低频形声字词汇通达的影响. 心理学报, 44(7), 882-895
陈原 (编). (1993). 现代汉语用字信息分析. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
韩布新. (1998). 汉字识别中部件的频率效应. 心理科学, 21(3), 193-195
李燕, 康加深. (1993). 现代汉语形声字声符研究. 见陈原(编). 现代汉语用字信息分析(pp. 68-98). 上海: 上海教育出版社.
谢敏, 杨青青, 王权红. (2016). 词汇加工研究中的P200成分. 心理学进展, 6(2), 114-120
Barnea, A., & Breznitz, Z. (1998). Phonological and orthographic processing of Hebrew words: Electrophysiological aspects. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159(4), 492-504, doi: 10.1080/00221329809596166.
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(3), 235-260, doi: 10.1162/089892999563373.
Carreiras, M., Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(2), 275-288, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21023.
Dien, J. (2009). The neurocognitive basis of reading single words as seen through early latency ERPs: A model of converging pathways. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 10-22, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.013.
Ding, G. S., Peng, D. L., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530-539, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.530.
Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: Effects of positional letter frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 951-964.
Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive and Neuroscience, 18(10), 1631-1643, doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1631.
Hsu, C. H., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2009). Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: An event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 108(1), 56-66, doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.002.
Kong, L. Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., & Kang, C. P. (2012). P200 can be modulated by orthography alone in reading Chinese words. Neuroscience Letters, 529(2), 161-165, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.028.
Kong, L. Y., Zhang, J. X., Kang, C. P., Du, Y. C., Zhang, B., & Wang, S. P. (2010). P200 and phonological processing in Chinese word recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 473(1), 37-41, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.02.014.
Kramer, A. F., & Donchin, E. (1987). Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13(1), 76-86, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.76.
Kutas, M., & van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Chan, W. H., Hsu, C. H., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. (2007). Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: An event-related potentials study. Neuroreport, 18(2), 147-151, doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328010d4e4.
Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2003). ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1231-1247, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1231.
Misra, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Event-related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 115-130, doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00012.
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134-144, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134.
Rugg, M. D. (1987). Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Sections A, 39(1), 123-148, doi: 10.1080/02724988743000060.
Savill, N. J., & Thierry, G. (2012). Decoding ability makes waves in reading: Deficient interactions between attention and phonological analysis in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1553-1564, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.008.
Wu, Y., Mo, D. Y., Tsang, Y. K., & Chen, H. C. (2012). ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition. Neuroscience Letters, 514(2), 164-168, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.080.
Yum, Y. N., Law, S. P., Su, I. F., Lau, K. Y. D., & Mo, K. N. (2014). An ERP study of effects of regularity and consistency in delayed naming and lexicality judgment in a logographic writing system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 315.
Zhang, Q., Zhang, J. X., & Kong, L. Y. (2009). An ERP study on the time course of phonological and semantic activation in Chinese word recognition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73(3), 235-245, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.001.
Zhou, L., Fong, M. C. M., Minett, J. W., Peng, G., & Wang, W. S. Y. (2014). Pre-lexical phonological processing in reading Chinese characters: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 30, 14-26, doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.03.002.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1245-1265, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245.
Ziegler, J. C., Benraïss, A., & Besson, M. (1999). From print to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. Psychophysiology, 36(6), 775-785, doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3660775.

[1]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[2]	邓碧琳, 张积家. 汉字词错觉结合的层次和影响因素[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 289-296.
[3]	刘月月, 王瑞明, 李利, 吴礼沐. 非平衡中-英双语者言语产生中非目标语言的语音激活[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 39-44.
[4]	潘颖, 邓小平, 林正军, 刘岩. 中国学生英语语音意识与英语阅读成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 229-239.
[5]	章玉祉, 张积家. 形声字的语义透明度和结构类型对义符语音激活进程的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(5): 612-617.
[6]	张锋. 汉字识别的反启动效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 458-463.
[7]	伍秋萍, 郑佩芸, 刘相辉. 3-12岁儿童对汉语声、韵、调的意识与早期阅读的关系：基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 643-653.
[8]	陈琳,周小兵,王雨函. 拼音在中文学习中的作用及加工机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 715-720.
[9]	阮氏芳, 李虹, 伍新春, 孙鹏. 汉语作为第二语言的越南大学生汉字部件意识的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 20-26.
[10]	肖艳丽, 阴国恩, 杨文. 面孔部件相似性判断中不同部件的相互影响研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 729-736.
[11]	刘艳, 陶云, 王晓曦, 马谐, 陈睿, 李思齐2. 发展性阅读障碍与工作记忆损伤研究进展*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 846-852.
[12]	熊建萍，闫国利. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的主要亚类型分析^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 496-500.
[13]	伍秋萍，郑佩芸，邢滨钰，康洁，郭琎. 语音记忆和视觉记忆在儿童汉语识字能力中同样重要吗？一个元分析综述^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 501-507.
[14]	杨海波，张雪健，周菘，刘颖，白学军. 语音加工的功能性近红外脑成像研究进展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(4): 566-571.
[15]	俞林鑫. 语音在汉字语义通达中作用的研究述评[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 413-417.