诚实-谦逊性和人际亲密性对公平规范执行的影响

心理与行为研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 419-425.

诚实-谦逊性和人际亲密性对公平规范执行的影响

齐春辉, 张振

河南师范大学教育学部，新乡 453007

收稿日期:2019-10-12 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-07-17
通讯作者: 张振，E-mail：2018128@htu.edu.cn
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目（20YJC190030）；河南省哲学社会科学规划项目（2019CJY030）；河南省软科学研究计划项目（192400410021）；河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目（2020-ZDJH-152）；河南师范大学博士科研启动基金（QD18043）；河南师范大学青年科学基金（2019QK31）

The Effect of Honesty-Humility and Interpersonal Closeness on Fairness Norm Enforcement

QI Chunhui, ZHANG Zhen

Faculty of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007

Received:2019-10-12 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-07-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用2（诚实-谦逊性：高分组、低分组）×3（人际亲密性：家人、朋友、路人）×2（提议不公性：高不公提议、低不公提议）的混合实验设计，考察人际冲突情境下诚实-谦逊性与公平规范执行中人情效应的关系。研究结果发现，随着人际亲密性的增强，人们对互动同伴的互惠预期越高，更倾向于接受不公提议；高、低诚实-谦逊者付诸公平规范执行时均会考量双方彼此的人际亲密性，但高诚实-谦逊者存在更强的人情效应。结果表明，高诚实-谦逊者更在意维持有价值的人际关系，愿意宽容重要他人的违规行为。

关键词: 诚实-谦逊性, 人际亲密性, 公平规范执行, 最后通牒博弈

Abstract: The present study explored whether individuals’ prosociality and interpersonal closeness have an interactive impact on fairness norm enforcement. A mixed design of a 2 (prosociality: high/low honesty-humility)×3 (interpersonal closeness: family/friend/stranger)×2 (unfairness: high/low unfair offer) was used. Forty-three high honesty-humility students and forty-three low honesty-humility students participated as responders with family, friend, or stranger in the two-party ultimatum game. As the interpersonal closeness increasing, individuals’ expectation became higher, and more likely to accept unfair offers. All participants’ fairness norm enforcement was influenced by prosociality and interpersonal closeness, but those with high levels of honesty-humility showed a more significant effect of interpersonal closeness. In conclusion, prosocial individuals are more concerned about maintaining valuable relationships even after a conflict and are willing to forgive norm violation from significant others.

Key words: honesty-humility, interpersonal closeness, fairness norm enforcement, ultimatum game

中图分类号:

B844.2

齐春辉, 张振. 诚实-谦逊性和人际亲密性对公平规范执行的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 419-425.

QI Chunhui, ZHANG Zhen. The Effect of Honesty-Humility and Interpersonal Closeness on Fairness Norm Enforcement[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 419-425.

参考文献

董军, 付淑英, 王洋, 李曌宇, 杨绍峰, 齐春辉. (2018). 自我控制对大学生人际信任的影响: 多重中介效应分析. 心理与行为研究, 16(2), 225-230
赖晓璐, 刘学兰, 黎莉. (2018). 亲密关系中的自我扩张. 心理科学进展, 26(12), 2170-2179
王珍珍, 蒋文明. (2016). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自行为的证据. 心理与行为研究, 14(5), 600-604, 646
徐杰, 孙向超, 董悦, 汪祚军, 李伟强, 袁博. (2017). 人情与公正的抉择: 社会距离对第三方干预的影响. 心理科学, 40(5), 1175-1181
杨邵峰, 齐春辉, 张志超, 张振. (2018). 价值取向对自我他人决策时公平规范执行的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(6), 834-840
袁博, 张振, 沈英伦, 黄亮, 李颖, 王益文. (2014). 价值取向与社会距离影响经济决策的合作与冲突行为: Chicken Game的证据. 心理科学, 37(4), 962-967
张振, 齐春辉, 王洋, 赵辉, 王小新, 高晓雷. (2020). 内群体偏爱或黑羊效应? 经济博弈中公平规范执行的群体偏见. 心理科学进展, 28(2), 329-339
张振, 齐春辉, 杨邵峰, 赵智军, 高晓雷, 熊建萍. (2019). 价值取向对大一新生普遍信任的影响: 多重中介效应分析. 心理与行为研究, 17(1), 63-67, 90
张振, 张帆, 黄亮, 袁博, 王益文. (2014). 决策中社会价值取向的理论与测评方法. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 48-56
张振, 张帆, 原胜, 郭丰波, 王益文. (2015). 社会价值取向滑块测验中文版的测量学分析. 心理与行为研究, 13(3), 404-409
Aaldering, H., Greer, L. L., van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2013). Interest (mis) alignments in representative negotiations: Do pro-social agents fuel or reduce inter-group conflict? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 240-250, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.001.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340-345, doi: 10.1080/00223890902935878.
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & De Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139-152, doi: 10.1177/1088868314523838.
Campanhã, C., Minati, L., Fregni, F., & Boggio, P. S. (2011). Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: Neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(43), 15569-15574, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1253-11.2011.
Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 15.
Fatfouta, R., Meshi, D., Merkl, A., & Heekeren, H. R. (2018). Accepting unfairness by a significant other is associated with reduced connectivity between medial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Social Neuroscience, 13(1), 61-73, doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1252795.
Haselhuhn, M. P., & Mellers, B. A. (2005). Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(1), 24-33, doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.005.
Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Wührl, J., & Zettler, I. (2015). From honesty-humility to fair behavior-benevolence or a (blind) fairness norm? Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 91-95, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.017.
Karagonlar, G., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2013). The role of social value orientation in response to an unfair offer in the ultimatum game. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 228-239, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.006.
Liu, T., & Pelowski, M. (2014). Clarifying the interaction types in two-person neuroscience research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 276.
McAuliffe, K., & Dunham, Y. (2016). Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686), 20150073, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0073.
McAuliffe, K., & Dunham, Y. (2017). Fairness overrides group bias in children’s second-party punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 485-494, doi: 10.1037/xge0000244.
McAuliffe, K., Blake, P. R., Steinbeis, N., & Warneken, F. (2017). The developmental foundations of human fairness. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(2), 42, doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0042.
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 1-15, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160.
Pletzer, J. L., Balliet, D., Joireman, J., Kuhlman, D. M., Voelpel, S. C., & van Lange, P. A. (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 62-83, doi: 10.1002/per.2139.
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413-425, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003.
Ruci, L., van Allen, Z. M., & Zelenski, J. M. (2018). Pro-social personality traits, helping behavior, and ego-depletion: Is helping really easier for the dispositionally pro-social? Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 32-39, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.013.
Rusch, H. (2014). The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: A review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1794), 20141539, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1539.
Thielmann, I., & Böhm, R. (2016). Who does (not) participate in intergroup conflict? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 778-787, doi: 10.1177/1948550616660160.
Wu, Y., Zhang, M. Y., Zhang, C., & Tian, X. H. (2015). Fairness-related behaviour modulation by friendship is moderated by American primes in Chinese participants. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 299-310, doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12111.

[1]	张振, 齐春辉, 付淑英, 王青春, 熊建萍. 社会距离和性别对公平关注的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 100-106.
[2]	杨邵峰, 齐春辉, 张志超, 张振. 价值取向对自我他人决策时公平规范执行的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 834-840.
[3]	陈晓燕, 莫秀锋, 张玲玲. 同伴接纳对儿童公平分配行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 774-780.
[4]	王珍珍,蒋文明. 公平加工的情境依赖性：来自行为的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 600-604.
[5]	董圣鸿,郑海林,王燕,余巧玲. 4-6岁儿童公平意图的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(3): 325-330.
[6]	王芹, 白学军, 李士一. 情绪背景和社会预期对社会经济决策行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(2): 191-197.